Audio Technica ATR2100 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

You are currently looking for a USB microphone with good sound quality and features. You are now stuck between Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti. They are both good microphones, but they do come with very different features. Hence, choosing the best one depends on your needs and purposes.

In this article, you can read and find out more about:
– The two mics’ different mechanisms and polar patterns,
– The different features of Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti,
– The differences in their sound quality, and
– Which one is the best USB mic for the money.

Size and Weight
First of all, Audio Technica ATR2100 and Blue Yeti come with very different designs. If you prefer a typical handheld microphone, Audio Technica ATR2100 is more suitable. It has the usual shape of a mic. It measures approximately 51 mm wide and 183 mm tall, with a weight of about 268 grams. If you ever need to put it on a stand, don’t worry. A tripod desk stand and the clamp are included in the bundle.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is shorter yet a little bulkier due to having the desk stand integrated onto the mic. It measures 12 cm x 12.5 cm x 29.5 cm. One nice thing is that the mic’s position is easily adjustable. You can easily angle the mic as needed to perform. See also: Blue Spark vs Blue Yeti.

Different Polar Patterns
Audio Technica ATR2100 is specifically designed for music and field recording. As stated by Audio Technica, it comes with a cardioid polar pattern. This is a good choice for capturing sounds from a single direction (the front) while attenuating environmental noise coming from other directions.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti has four selectable polar patterns. It has cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, and omnidirectional polar patterns. Hence, it is very versatile. You can adjust the polar pattern to match the needs of different conditions, such as podcasting, field recording, and interviewing.

Technical Specs

Audio Technica ATR2100Blue Yeti
- Element: Dynamic- Capsules: condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Polar Patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response: 50-15,000 Hz- Frequency Response: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Power Requirements: USB Power (5V DC)- Max SPL: 120dB (THD: 0.5% 1kHz)
- Bit Depth: 16 bit- Bit Rate: 16bit
- Sample Rate: 44.1 kHz/48 kHz- Sample Rate: 48kHz

Connection Ports
Audio Technica ATR2100 is more versatile in terms of output capabilities. This model has two output options, USB and XLR. Thus, this mic is great if you need a mic that can perform well in a mobile setting as well as studio environment. This is also a great backup mic, as the dual connection options may prove to be handy in certain situations. By the way, there is a 3.5 mm headphone jack for direct monitoring. There is an on/off switch for easy control.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti only supports USB. It does have a 3.5 mm headphone jack with a dedicated volume control for direct monitoring. There is a mute button for controlling when to pause and continue the recording.

Sound Quality
Finally, note that these two mics use very different mechanisms. Audio Technica ATR2100 is a dynamic microphone. In general, it has a good ability to reject noise. It is also generally more durable. Hence, it is a great choice for field recording. The sound quality of Audio Technica ATR2100 is good. It is clear and accurate.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is a condenser microphone. It is very sensitive. Because of this, it usually requires a treated room with no environment noise. The overall sound quality is good; it is bright, crisp, and accurate.

Audio Technica ATR2100 Vs Blue Yeti

- Handheld dynamic microphone with USB digital output and XLR analog output
- USB output connects to your computer for digital recording, while the XLR output connects with your sound system conventional microphone input for use in live performance
- Smooth, extended frequency response ideally suited for podcasting, home studio recording, field recording, voiceover, and on-stage use
- Built-in headphone jack allows you to directly monitor your microphone output without audible delay
- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of unwanted sounds from the sides and rear
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
-Compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8 (including 8.1), Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP (Home and Professional), and Mac OS X (10.4.11 or higher), and requires a minimum of 64 MB of RAM(remove existing and upload)
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output. Dimensions (extended in stand) : 4.72 x 4.92 x 11.61 inches
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls

Conclusion
In general, Audio Technica ATR2100 is more recommended. This mic is more versatile, suitable for both field recording and studio recording. The dynamic mic and cardioid polar pattern offer a good ability to reject environmental noise. In addition, it has USB and XLR outputs.

Leave a Reply