Audio Technica ATR2500 vs Blue Yeti are budget-friendly USB microphones that are suitable for home recording, podcasting, and voice-over uses. They are available in a similar price range, with Audio Technica ATR2500 being slightly more affordable than Blue Yeti. So, which is better for you to choose? Continue reading below to see the differences and comparisons between these two microphones.
In this article, we will discuss about:
– The size, weight, and portability of each mic,
– The distinctive features of Audio Technica ATR2500 vs Blue Yeti,
– The comparison of their sound quality, and
– Which USB microphone that is more recommended in the end.
Size and Weight
If you need a portable USB mic that you can carry along in any trip or travel, Audio Technica ATR2500 is probably a better option. This microphone comes with a significantly slimmer, lighter body. It has a simple tubular shape, and it comes with a foldable stand that is lightweight and practical. You can easily put everything that you need to work with this mic into your bag. See also: Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti.
On the other hand, Blue Yeti is pretty portable – you can easily move it around in your studio room. However, it is not really suitable for a trip or travel. It is quite bigger and heavier. The integrated stand is particularly bulky, so it will take a lot of space if put in your bag. This mic is more suitable for usage in a studio room.
|Audio Technica ATR2500||Blue Yeti|
|- Element : Condenser||- Capsules : condenser, pressure gradient|
|- Polar Pattern : Cardioid||- Polar Patterns : cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo|
|- Frequency Response : 30-15,000 Hz||- Frequency Response : 20Hz - 20kHz|
|- Sample Rate : 44.1 kHz/48 kHz||- Sample Rate : 48kHz|
|- Bit Depth : 16 bit||- Bit Rate : 16bit|
Both Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti are side-address mics. In other words, you speak into the side of the mic, not to the top. However, there is a distinction with their polar patterns. Audio Technica ATR2500 only has a cardioid polar pattern – which is generally not a problem, as cardioid is the most commonly used for various purposes.
Blue Yeti has four selectable polar patterns, which include cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo. Hence, with Blue Yeti, you can adapt to different recording conditions. The bidirectional pattern is nice for interviews, and the stereo pattern is quite useful when you want to create a stereo track. However, cardioid is the one that you will mainly use in most cases. You can find out more about this mic from the manufacturer, Blue Microphones, here.
Each of these two microphones comes with a headphone port for zero-latency direct monitoring. Each has a dedicated headphone volume control, so you can adjust the volume for monitoring without altering the actual input that is being recorded.
However, Blue Yeti comes with two additional features that are not available on Audio Technica ATR2500. First, this mic has a mute button, which may come to be very handy for controlling the recording. You just need to hit the button to pause the recording instead of toying with the software, and hit it again when you are ready to continue. Second, this mic also has a gain control, which is nice for adjusting the input level.
Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti both record in 16-bit/48kHz. Generally, they both sound good. They can capture sound with very good accuracy, sharpness, and detail. Audio Technica ATR2500 does have a lower self-noise level, but Blue Yeti is not really worse. On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a wider frequency response range that can capture more high-end and low-end.
Audio Technica ATR2500 Vs Blue Yeti
Between these two mics, we recommend you to choose Blue Yeti. It is more versatile with multiple polar patterns. The mute button and gain control are very handy. The sound quality is about as good as Audio Technica ATR2500. It actually has a wider frequency response range, which means that it can capture more high-end and low-end.