Speaking about microphone, this small device become more popular and a lot of brands began to produce it. Among various brands and types, here we are going to narrow down for comparing two microphone. They are Blue Yeti and HyperX Quadcast.
If you find it difficult to pick one of them, hopefully this article will give you clear idea for it.
Blue Yeti vs HyperX Quadcast
Typically, this two mics seem to look alike each other. We can say this as they are almost the same in build quality, polar patterns, which are Cardioid, Omni, Stereo, and Bi-directional patterns. Even in the way of variant color.
Anyway, a shock mount with a stand mount mic might be the differences between them as only the Quadcast equipped with those two. Read also: Blue Yeti X VS Samson G Track Pro.
Blue Yeti USB Microphone.
As everyone knows, the Blue’s mics considered as a High end microphone with super high price as well. Thankfully, such opinion is revealed as they introduced the Blue Yeti. In fact, the Blue Yeti is one of best selling USB microphone recebtly in the market with a really friendly price.
The Blue Yeti designed to be used easily with the plug and play setting. This mic perfectly works on any device with Windows or Mac OS. You can connect this mic to your PC simply before you are ready to use it. No need any drivers to install before.
|Blue Yeti Nano||HyperX Quadcast|
|Product Dimensions||4.29 x 3.78 x 8.31 inches||9.84 x 5.08 x 4.06 inches
|Shipping Weight||1.39 pounds||1.32 pounds
|Best Offer||click here||click here|
Moreover, it also built with great quality material. The body is not flimsy and very durable.
The Blue Yeti is more versatile compare to other USB microphone which only feature cardioid pattern, thanks to multitude pickup patterns such as omnidirectional, cardioid, stereo and bidirectional.
For fulfilling your lifestyle, this mic comes with the following colors; Silver, Cool Grey, Blackout, and Whiteout.
As the Blue Yeti produces pretty good sound quality, this mic will be perfect for either podcaster or even for recording music. In this case, the mic will provide you better sound quality if we compare to most cardioid mics in the market because it is simply a stereo recording.
Additionally, you can also use omni setting available in the Blue Yeti if you own a cardioid microphone already. By doing this, you can do recording with both mics at the same time utilizing mid size technique. For your information, this rechnique is excellent in a way to create stereo recording.
However, there is one issue with this which is that using two USB microphones simultaneously isn’t that easy.
Considering its price, the Blue Yeti perform a very good sound quality, especially with the four patterns available in it. Besides, this mic is also made for the ease of use since you don’t need to have technical knowledge to configure it.
With all of these pickup patterns you can easily do all of this without any issues.
HyperX QuadCast USB Microphone
Now let’s talk about the competitor. The Quadcast is dedicated to streamers who want to share their gameplay. Besides, YouTubers are also good for using this mic.
Lets say that the Quadcast can do almost everything as it is a versatile mic. However actually the Quadcast is not as professional look as the competitor, Blue Yeti.
The similarities between the two mics may be the pickup patterns. Just like the Blue Yeti, this mic also features Cardioid-, Omni-, Bi-directional-, and stereo patterns.
Besides, the Quadcast bundled with built in shock mount and is able to be attached to a desk-stand. This is for sure an interesting bonus for the consumer because it will completely avoid from picking up unwanted vibration from the desk.Unfortunately, the Blue Yeti doesn’t equipped with this feature.
There is an access to USB connection located at the back of the microphone. You will also find another access to a headphone jack there so that that you can do zero-latency monitoring.
The Quadcast mic will light up in a nice color as it connected and begin to work.
A touch sensitive Mute button are available on the top of the microphone . By the time you mute the mic, it will also turned off the background light inside.
Another nice and interesting features which may not be available in other USB microphone; No need to turn the Gain dial by the time you want to mute the mic.
Last but not least, the Stereo and Bi-directional patterns are identical for both the mics. The only difference between them is that the bi-directional picks up sound from the front and back, while the Stereo picks up sound from both sides.
The HyperX Quadcast proof its achievements to produce good sound quality. Whether for human voice, streaming or voice over. The sound is full so almost need no extra editing after the recording. This mic already produced professional sound out of it.
However, the Cardioid pattern makes it sounded way too boomy for those whonsensitive with such sound. This will be different compare to the stereo pattern.
The pop filter of the Quadcast also becomes a problem for some people. The company basically design it to reduce unwanted plosives during your speech.
Another issue coming from this mic is when it mounted to a regular mic stand using an adapter, it seems like almost no room between the mic and the mic stand. This eventually creates unimportany pressure on both the USB and yhe headphone cables.
Blue Yeti Nano vs HyperX Quadcast
Overall, the Quadcast might look cooler compare to the Blue Yeti. However, it’s hardly said that Quadcast is not a better microphone really worth to buy.
Personally, I would love the Blue Yeti to be my partner in broadcasting and podcasting. This decision made of specification as well as price consideration.