People nowadays are very common with vlogging activities. They will record every interesting things using either mobile phone or camera. The other thing becomes popular today is the microphone. Vlogger will need this tool to describe or explain things they record. Microphone with high quality specifications will improve their recording quality which will impact on the video result.
Blue Yeti and HyperX Quadcast are two among popular microphoneifor those who need a high-quality USB microphone at an affordable price.
Both microphones provide excellent audio quality, user friendly, and performance. The choice between these two can be hard and confusing for beginners and professionals.
The following article will compare between HyperX Quadcast and Blue Yeti to see how similar and different they are. We will see both mics in detail then analyze different features. As the result, you will have a better idea of which one is better for what specific work.
USB Connectivity
Both the two mics are USB condenser mics. USB mics has a simple setup and easy to use. Read also: Elgato Wave 3 vs Blue Yeti.
Both Blue Yeti and HyperX Quadcast make you need no any intermediary device to record with these mics. You only need to plug in the USB cable into your device, and you are ready to go.
Build Quality
The Blue Yeti weighs more than HyperX Quadcast. HyperX weighs less than its competitor and that makes it a better mic to travel with. People can pack it easily in a handbag and keep using it while travelling.
Besides the weight, the Yeti comes with an elegant look. It looks sophisticated, and despite its bulky looks, Yeti provides a mic presence that looks really cool in videos. The Yeti has a stylish black finish that makes it blend perfectly in any interior.
On the other had, The HyperX features a modern as well as stylish look. It also has a prominent presence that looks perfect in videos. As it is more of a game-oriented mic, the HyperX features RGB lights as well. The lights give a vibrant and playful effect.
| Blue Yeti | HyperX Quadcast | |
|---|---|---|
  |   |
|
| Product Dimensions | 4.9 x 4.7 x 11.6 inches | 5.05 x 4 x 9.8 inches |
| Shipping Weight | 3.2 pounds | 1.6 pounds |
| Shop now at Amazon | click here | click here |
But, if you are not someone who likes the RGB lights in the microphone, you can dial those down in the settings.
Shock Mount and Pop filter
The other differences of Blue Yeti and Hyperx Quadcast are the number of accessories that they come with.
For Yeti, it doesn’t provide with shock mount of the pop filter. This is disappointing as both are considered essential accessories for recording setup. Without a shock mount, any vibration, hiss or even taps on the desk can reduce the audio quality.
You need a shock mount that keeps the mic stable whenever an accidental push or tap of the hand. The mic stays stable, and the audio quality will not affected by any vibrations.
A pop filter will keep the audio free from puff sounds or plosives. While recording, if you have a mic too close to your mouth for better audio capturing, ps and fs’ sounds will disturb the audio quality.
HyperX Quadcast covers all your needs in this regard. It comes with both a pop filter and a shock mount as well. A quality shock mount and pop filter cost you somewhere around $30-$40, which makes the Quadcast a more complete package.
So that is where HyperX Quadcast leads. It provides both a shock mount and pop filter. You can buy these separately for the Blue Yeti, but a decent quality pop filter and a shock mount obviously adds to the cost of setting up the Blue Yeti properly.
On the other word, we can say that Yeti offers more sale compare to the Quadcast. That is why the Yeti may make a better deal.
Audio Quality
Both the microphone we compare here provide superb audio quality. They designed with high-quality studio mics, also provide a broadcast quality sound that seems very ideal for studio recordings. Besides, it adds a depth like radio transmission to your audio recording. This type of audio is perfectly fitted for podcasting and live streaming.
Both Yeti and HyperX Quadcast microphones are quite similar in terms of the audio output. Both the microphones feature the same frequency range which is between 20 to 20K Hz.
Moreover, the Yeti and HyperX Quadcast come with a high pass filter with 20 dB attenuation. It takes the shrill off the loud noise and eliminating the unwanted noise from affecting your audio very well.
Real-Time Monitoring
In terms of this, both of these mics allow you to monitor the audio in real-time. They equipped with a headphone jack for connecting headphones. This features allow you to monitor the audio in real-time, and a button under the mics also allows you to adjust the volume in real-time.
Onboard Control
Both these mics provide all the monitoring options on the mic. All options are available on the mic since the USB mics come with a simple setup,. It is easy to choose one of the four different polar patterns, and the user have to touch the button on the mic to change the pattern.
Besides, both mics we compare here feature a mute button under the mic. Whenever you want to pause the recording, simply press the button. You can also use this if you don’t want to record audio.
Overall, both microphones provide full control on the mic. The user allowed to change patterns, mute the recording, plug in a headphone in its 3.5 headphone jack, and adjust the volume as well. Plus, you can adjust the high-pass filter up to 20 dB, too.
Blue Yeti and HyperX Quadcast
Final Verdict
Both Blue Yeti and HyperX Quadcast are considered as excellent choices for live streamers, podcasting, video recordings, and Youtube. Both of them are almost similar in their features and offer simple setup, versatile looks with great functionality. The only difference between these two is the number of accessories and price. But then again, is not a big issue. If you are buying a studio pack, then the Blue Yeti costs almost the same as the HyperX Quadcast. In the end, it boils down to the formal and casual looks and personal preferences.