Browse Category: Audio-Technica

Audio Technica ATR2500 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Audio Technica ATR2500 vs Blue Yeti are budget-friendly USB microphones that are suitable for home recording, podcasting, and voice-over uses. They are available in a similar price range, with Audio Technica ATR2500 being slightly more affordable than Blue Yeti. So, which is better for you to choose? Continue reading below to see the differences and comparisons between these two microphones.

In this article, we will discuss about:
– The size, weight, and portability of each mic,
– The distinctive features of Audio Technica ATR2500 vs Blue Yeti,
– The comparison of their sound quality, and
– Which USB microphone that is more recommended in the end.

Size and Weight
If you need a portable USB mic that you can carry along in any trip or travel, Audio Technica ATR2500 is probably a better option. This microphone comes with a significantly slimmer, lighter body. It has a simple tubular shape, and it comes with a foldable stand that is lightweight and practical. You can easily put everything that you need to work with this mic into your bag. See also: Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is pretty portable – you can easily move it around in your studio room. However, it is not really suitable for a trip or travel. It is quite bigger and heavier. The integrated stand is particularly bulky, so it will take a lot of space if put in your bag. This mic is more suitable for usage in a studio room.

Techical Specs

Audio Technica ATR2500Blue Yeti
- Element : Condenser- Capsules : condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response : 30-15,000 Hz- Frequency Response : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Sample Rate : 44.1 kHz/48 kHz- Sample Rate : 48kHz
- Bit Depth : 16 bit- Bit Rate : 16bit

Pickup Pattern
Both Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti are side-address mics. In other words, you speak into the side of the mic, not to the top. However, there is a distinction with their polar patterns. Audio Technica ATR2500 only has a cardioid polar pattern – which is generally not a problem, as cardioid is the most commonly used for various purposes.

Blue Yeti has four selectable polar patterns, which include cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo. Hence, with Blue Yeti, you can adapt to different recording conditions. The bidirectional pattern is nice for interviews, and the stereo pattern is quite useful when you want to create a stereo track. However, cardioid is the one that you will mainly use in most cases. You can find out more about this mic from the manufacturer, Blue Microphones, here.

Other Features
Each of these two microphones comes with a headphone port for zero-latency direct monitoring. Each has a dedicated headphone volume control, so you can adjust the volume for monitoring without altering the actual input that is being recorded.

However, Blue Yeti comes with two additional features that are not available on Audio Technica ATR2500. First, this mic has a mute button, which may come to be very handy for controlling the recording. You just need to hit the button to pause the recording instead of toying with the software, and hit it again when you are ready to continue. Second, this mic also has a gain control, which is nice for adjusting the input level.

Sound Quality
Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti both record in 16-bit/48kHz. Generally, they both sound good. They can capture sound with very good accuracy, sharpness, and detail. Audio Technica ATR2500 does have a lower self-noise level, but Blue Yeti is not really worse. On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a wider frequency response range that can capture more high-end and low-end.

Audio Technica ATR2500 Vs Blue Yeti

- Side-address condenser microphone with USB output for easy connection to your computer
- Ideal for podcasting, home studio recording, field recording, and voiceover use
- Built-in headphone jack allows you to directly monitor your microphone output without audible delay
- Adjust headphone volume with easy-to-use controls on the front of the microphone
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation.
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo.
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output.
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls

Conclusion
Between these two mics, we recommend you to choose Blue Yeti. It is more versatile with multiple polar patterns. The mute button and gain control are very handy. The sound quality is about as good as Audio Technica ATR2500. It actually has a wider frequency response range, which means that it can capture more high-end and low-end.

Audio Technica ATR2100 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

You are currently looking for a USB microphone with good sound quality and features. You are now stuck between Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti. They are both good microphones, but they do come with very different features. Hence, choosing the best one depends on your needs and purposes.

In this article, you can read and find out more about:
– The two mics’ different mechanisms and polar patterns,
– The different features of Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti,
– The differences in their sound quality, and
– Which one is the best USB mic for the money.

Size and Weight
First of all, Audio Technica ATR2100 and Blue Yeti come with very different designs. If you prefer a typical handheld microphone, Audio Technica ATR2100 is more suitable. It has the usual shape of a mic. It measures approximately 51 mm wide and 183 mm tall, with a weight of about 268 grams. If you ever need to put it on a stand, don’t worry. A tripod desk stand and the clamp are included in the bundle.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is shorter yet a little bulkier due to having the desk stand integrated onto the mic. It measures 12 cm x 12.5 cm x 29.5 cm. One nice thing is that the mic’s position is easily adjustable. You can easily angle the mic as needed to perform. See also: Blue Spark vs Blue Yeti.

Different Polar Patterns
Audio Technica ATR2100 is specifically designed for music and field recording. As stated by Audio Technica, it comes with a cardioid polar pattern. This is a good choice for capturing sounds from a single direction (the front) while attenuating environmental noise coming from other directions.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti has four selectable polar patterns. It has cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, and omnidirectional polar patterns. Hence, it is very versatile. You can adjust the polar pattern to match the needs of different conditions, such as podcasting, field recording, and interviewing.

Technical Specs

Audio Technica ATR2100Blue Yeti
- Element: Dynamic- Capsules: condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Polar Patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response: 50-15,000 Hz- Frequency Response: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Power Requirements: USB Power (5V DC)- Max SPL: 120dB (THD: 0.5% 1kHz)
- Bit Depth: 16 bit- Bit Rate: 16bit
- Sample Rate: 44.1 kHz/48 kHz- Sample Rate: 48kHz

Connection Ports
Audio Technica ATR2100 is more versatile in terms of output capabilities. This model has two output options, USB and XLR. Thus, this mic is great if you need a mic that can perform well in a mobile setting as well as studio environment. This is also a great backup mic, as the dual connection options may prove to be handy in certain situations. By the way, there is a 3.5 mm headphone jack for direct monitoring. There is an on/off switch for easy control.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti only supports USB. It does have a 3.5 mm headphone jack with a dedicated volume control for direct monitoring. There is a mute button for controlling when to pause and continue the recording.

Sound Quality
Finally, note that these two mics use very different mechanisms. Audio Technica ATR2100 is a dynamic microphone. In general, it has a good ability to reject noise. It is also generally more durable. Hence, it is a great choice for field recording. The sound quality of Audio Technica ATR2100 is good. It is clear and accurate.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is a condenser microphone. It is very sensitive. Because of this, it usually requires a treated room with no environment noise. The overall sound quality is good; it is bright, crisp, and accurate.

Audio Technica ATR2100 Vs Blue Yeti

- Handheld dynamic microphone with USB digital output and XLR analog output
- USB output connects to your computer for digital recording, while the XLR output connects with your sound system conventional microphone input for use in live performance
- Smooth, extended frequency response ideally suited for podcasting, home studio recording, field recording, voiceover, and on-stage use
- Built-in headphone jack allows you to directly monitor your microphone output without audible delay
- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of unwanted sounds from the sides and rear
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
-Compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8 (including 8.1), Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP (Home and Professional), and Mac OS X (10.4.11 or higher), and requires a minimum of 64 MB of RAM(remove existing and upload)
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output. Dimensions (extended in stand) : 4.72 x 4.92 x 11.61 inches
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls

Conclusion
In general, Audio Technica ATR2100 is more recommended. This mic is more versatile, suitable for both field recording and studio recording. The dynamic mic and cardioid polar pattern offer a good ability to reject environmental noise. In addition, it has USB and XLR outputs.

Audio Technica AT2035 Review: Condenser with the Best Bang for the Bucks

People love condenser microphones. When one is trying to capture the utmost details from a recording session, a condenser mic can be the best bet. Condenser mics are generally bright and crisp, allowing the user to capture the slightest audio details possible. However, not all condenser microphones are that astonishing. So, you need to be careful in choosing the right condenser mic that you are going to purchase. One wise thing to do is by reading some reviews online regarding the best mics available in your price range.

Audio Technica AT2035 Review Condenser with the Best Bang for the Bucks

For a budget of under two hundred dollars, Audio Technica AT2035 is one of the best condenser mics available on the market. As a matter of fact, Audio Technica AT2035was one of the best-selling models at the time of its release. There are reasons behind its popularity, for sure. For one, it is available at such affordable and budget-friendly price point. It also has decent quality and construction. The maximum SPL handling is so high that it can safely handle very loud voices. The audio quality is great and suitable even for professional recording and live performance. The additional features further increase the value of this mic.

Audio Technica AT2035 is a condenser microphone that is powered by a fixed-charge back plate with a permanently polarized condenser. It is equipped with a large diaphragm in order to deliver smooth and natural sound with minimal noise. The housing is solid and rugged. The grille is also made of a robust metallic material. The whole body is colored in black, creating such an attractive and elegant appearance. The packaging bundle includes a custom shock mount to provide superior noise isolation, as well as a protective pouch for easy and secure portability.

Audio Technica AT2035 has a cardioid polar pattern. In other words, the mic has been designed to capture sounds coming from the front side while rejecting and attenuating sounds from the sides and rear. With this design, Audio Technica AT2035 is able to focus capturing the sounds coming from just a single source without too much environmental noise. The internal noise level of this mic is just barely 12 dB. This mic is very quiet. There is virtually no audible humming noise when operating.

PriceFeatures

- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of sounds from the sides and rear, improving isolation of desired sound source - Large diaphragm for smooth, natural sound and low noise - (1) Pop Filter to eliminate the annoying "plosives" from your recordings - (1) 10ft. XLR Cable to connect the mic to your mixer or interface - (1) Microfiber Cleaning Cloth

With a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, Audio Technica AT2035 is capable of capturing lows, mids, and highs with exceptional accuracy and clarity. The frequency response is accurate and precise. The audio reproduction is bright and crisp, just like what you would expect from a condenser microphone. The articulate sound is suitable especially for vocals. However, Audio Technica AT2035 also has decent depth and bass quality, making it also suitable for some instruments like snares and guitars. The truth is, Audio Technica AT2035 can perform well for almost any purpose.

Have we mentioned that Audio Technica AT2035 also comes with some additional features? We are talking about the bass roll-off and preattenuation pad. With a simple switch control, you can turn on and off the bass roll-off, which will attenuate the bass frequencies under 80 Hz to eliminate LF noise. Meanwhile, with the preattenuation pad, you will be able to have a maximum SPL handling of 158 dB!

Specifications of Audio Technica AT2035
ELEMENT Fixed-charge back plate with permanently polarized condenser
POLAR PATTERN Cardioid
FREQUENCY RESPONSE RANGE 20-20,000 Hz
SWITCHES Flat, roll-off; 10 dB pad (nominal)
LOW FREQUENCY ROLL-OFF from 80 Hz, 12 dB/octave
IMPEDANCE 120 ohms
OPEN CIRCUIT SENSITIVITY -33 dB (22.4 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa
DYNAMIC RANGE (1 kHz at Max SPL) 136 dB
MAXIMUM INPUT SOUND LEVEL 148 dB SPL, 1 kHz at 1% T.H.D.; 158 dB SPL, with 10 dB pad (nominal)
SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO (1 kHz at 1 Pa) 82 dB
NOISE 12 dB SPL
DIMENSIONS 170.0 mm (6.69″) long, 52.0 mm (2.05″) diameter
WEIGHT 403 g
PHANTOM POWER 11 – 52V DC, 3.8 mA typical
OUTPUT CONNECTOR Integral 3-pin XLRM-type

Pros of Audio Technica AT2035
– Exceptional audio quality with bright, crisp, and crystal-clear output
– Full and accurate frequency response
– Feature-packed with bass roll-off and preattenuation pad
– Compact and lightweight
– Very flexible and versatile, suitable for home, professional, and live use

Price ofAudio Technica AT2035
Check the best price ofAudio Technica AT2035 here!

Audio Technica AT2035 Vs Rode NT1A Comparison

One thing for sure, both Audio Technica and Rode are big names in the industry of microphones. Both companies have produced a number of excellent high-quality products that people love. This time, we are going to discuss about Audio Technica AT2035 and Rode NT1A. These two products are condenser microphones available in a similar price range. Indeed, more often than not, you will find Rode NT1A to be priced more expensively than Audio Technica AT2035, but the price gap is relatively scalable. Audio Technica AT2035 and Rode NT1A are both great, but which is the one that you should choose?

audio-technica-at2035-vs-rode-nt1a

Design
Quite interestingly, Audio Technica AT2035 and Rode NT1A are roughly of the same size and weight. Rode NT1A is slightly longer, slimmer, and lighter than Audio Technica AT2035, but the differences are pretty much marginal that you can handle either mic conveniently. Both models feature metallic construction for total ruggedness and durability. Audio Technica AT2035 is colored in black, while Rode NT1A is colored in a silvery hue. (See also : Audio Technica AT2035 Vs AKG Perception 220 Comparison)

Technical Specs

Audio Technica AT2035Rode NT1A
- ELEMENT : Fixed-charge back plate, permanently polarized condenser - Large 1" (25mm) capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- POLAR PATTERN : Cardioid- Cardioid polar pattern
- FREQUENCY RESPONSE : 20-20,000 Hz- Self noise of only 5dB (A)
- LOW FREQUENCY ROLL-OFF : 80 Hz, 12 dB/octave- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry
- OPEN CIRCUIT SENSITIVITY : -33 dB (22.4 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa- Wide dynamic range
- IMPEDANCE : 120 ohms- Gold plated output contacts
- NOISE : 12 dB SPL- Internal capsule shock mounting

Performance
Both products come with a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. The frequency response range is wide enough to capture sufficient lows, mids, and highs to generate an audio reproduction with decent depth and well-staged notes. However, in general, we can say that Audio Technica AT2035 and Rode NT1A each excel for different purposes.

Audio Technica AT2035 makes a great all-purpose microphone. It is very versatile. The frequency response range is quite flat, allowing you to capture vocals and instruments without losing the unique tonal characteristics. It also has a very low self-noise level of barely 12 dB SPL, making the output crisp and clear. Audio Technica AT2035 also boasts high maximum SPL handling, allowing you take care of loud sounds with ease.

On the other hand, Rode NT1A makes an exceptional vocal mic. The midrange and treble have excellent presence, effectively ensuring that any vocal can soar over the instruments. It also provides decent warmth to the audio. Furthermore, Rode NT1A’s greatest advantage is its ultra-low self-noise level. It only has an equivalent noise level of only 5 dB-A. With Rode NT1A, you can capture virtually no noise for superior audio clarity.

Feature
Audio Technica AT2035’s versatility is enhanced even further by its built-in features; it comes with a bass-cut filter and a pre-attenuation pad. The 80-Hz bass-cut filter provides 12 dB attenuation per octave. This is handy when you want to isolate a vocal from low-frequency noise such as wind, breath, and handling noise. Meanwhile, the -10dB pre-attenuation pad allows you to capture even higher volume levels. The mic comes with a custom shock mount. Meanwhile, Rode NT1A features an internal capsule shock mounting for superior rejection of handling noise. It comes with a shock mount, pop filter, and dust cover.

Audio Technica AT2035 Vs Rode NT1A

- Large diaphragm for smooth, natural sound and low noise
- High SPL handling and wide dynamic range provide unmatched versatility
- Custom shock mount provides superior isolation
- Switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter and 10 dB pad
- 10 Year warranty on the Rode NT1-A
- Large 1" (25mm) capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Self noise of only 5dB (A)
- premium 20' microphone cable

Conclusion
If you need a mic for vocals, you should go with Rode NT1A. It performs exceptionally for vocals, and the ultra-low self-noise ensures that any vocal can be captured with the utmost crisp and clarity. However, if you need a general-purpose mic that can take care of both vocals and instruments, Audio Technica AT2035 is the way to go.

Audio Technica AT2035 Vs AKG Perception 220 Comparison

Are you looking for a condenser microphone for vocals and instruments? Audio Technica AT2035 and AKG Perception 220 are two condenser microphones available in a similar price range. Generally, people consider these mics to be affordable and budget-friendly, yet they offer superior performance levels and a good deal of versatility. Each of these two products has also received a lot of positive reviews from the market. So, should you choose Audio Technica AT2035 or AKG Perception 220? Below, we are going to see each model to determine which one makes the best bang for the bucks!

audio-technica-at2035-vs-akg-perception-220

Audio Technica AT2035
Audio Technica AT2035 is a condenser microphone with a large diaphragm for smooth, natural, and low-noise audio reproduction. The mic is characterized by an all-black metal body and grille. On the mic, you can find two switches. These two switches are a high-pass filter switch and a pre-attenuation pad. Meanwhile, the mic comes with a cardioid polar pattern, and generally provides a decent isolation to the main audio source while rejecting noise coming from the sides and rear. The mic also comes with a custom shock mount for superior rejection of handling noise and mechanical vibrations. (Have a look : Audio Technica AT2035 Vs AT2020 Comparison)

Technical Specs

Audio Technica AT2035AKG Perception 220
- FREQUENCY RESPONSE : 20-20,000 Hz - Audio frequency bandwidth : 20 to 20000 Hz
- LOW FREQUENCY ROLL-OFF : 80 Hz, 12 dB/octave- Equivalent noise level 16 dB-A
- OPEN CIRCUIT SENSITIVITY : -33 dB (22.4 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa- Sensitivity : 18 mV/Pa
- IMPEDANCE : 120 ohms- Signal to Noise : 78 dB-A
- NOISE : 12 dB SPL- Preattenuation Pad : -20 dB
- DYNAMIC RANGE (typical) : 136 dB, 1 kHz at Max SPL- Bass cut filter : 300 Hz
- SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO : 82 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa- Electrical impedance : 200 Ohms

Audio Technica AT2035 possesses a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, which allows the mic to capture decent lows, mids, and highs. It also has an excellent sensitivity that it can easily capture subtle audio details from vocals and instruments, enhancing the accuracy and quality. Audio Technica AT2035’s output has decent depth, with the bass, midrange, and treble properly staged. The native maximum SPL handling is already quite high, 148 dB, but you can increase to 158 dB with the -10 dB pre-attenuation pad. You can also switch on the bass-cut filter when recording a vocal in order to eliminate low-frequency noise such as wind and breath sounds.

AKG Perception 220
Quite interestingly, AKG Perception 220 is quite similar to Audio Technica AT2035. Of course, there are some slight distinctions. AKG Perception 220 comes with an all-metal body and robust design for maximum durability. The housing is black while the grille is light brown. The mic also comes with a shock mount that functions to reject handling and mechanical noise.

AKG Perception 220 comes with 20 Hz – 20 kHz frequency response range, too. The mic also features built-in 80-Hz bass-cut filter and -20dB pre-attenuation pad. However, even with the pre-attenuation pad turned on, AKG Perception 220 still has a lower maximum SPL handling compared to Audio Technica AT2035, only 155 dB. Which means, the native maximum SPL handling is roughly about 135 dB. Furthermore, AKG Perception 220’s self-noise level is also slightly higher than Audio Technica AT2035. So, even though it is quite quiet as well, the crisp and clarity are inferior to the mic’s contender here.

Audio Technica AT2035 Vs AKG Perception 220

- Large diaphragm for smooth, natural sound and low noise
- High SPL handling and wide dynamic range provide unmatched versatility
- Custom shock mount provides superior isolation
- Rugged all-metal body and robust design withstands tough day-to-day use
- Switchable bass-cut filter eliminates rumble or footfall noise
- Switchable attenuation pad for high SPL applications up to 155 dB SPL

Conclusion
In the end, even though both products are excellent, we recommend you to choose Audio Technica AT2035. The maximum SPL handling is higher, allowing you take care of louder volume levels with ease. It also has a lower self-noise level, effectively enhancing the output’s crisp and clarity.

Audio Technica AT2035 Vs AT2020 Comparison

Audio Technica is one of the most notable brands in the market of microphones. Since the company is known to produce high-quality products, a lot of people tend to get confused in choosing between their mic models. For example, Audio Technica AT2020 and Audio Technica AT2035 are two popular mic models that often cause confusion among potential buyers. The two share many similarities, yet they are priced a little bit differently from each other. Audio Technica AT2035 is slightly more expensive than Audio Technica AT2020. So, what does the price increment bring? Which is the model that holds the best bang for the bucks? Let’s find out below!

audio-technica-at2035-vs-at2020

Design and Feature
Both products are designed quite similarly to each other. Both are black, and rather slender. Both are also reasonably rugged and durable. Audio Technica AT2020 and Audio Technica AT2035 are popular for heavy-duty usage, as they can endure the abuse and last. However, after carefully observing the two products, you may then notice that Audio Technica AT2020 doesn’t have the switches that Audio Technica AT2035 has. Indeed, Audio Technica AT2020 is quite a simple and straightforward mic model, while Audio Technica AT2035 is given more additional features. (Have a look: MXL 770 Vs AT2020)

Technical Specs

Audio Technica AT2035Audio Technica AT2020
- ELEMENT Fixed-charge back plate, permanently polarized condenser- ELEMENT Fixed-charge back plate, permanently polarized condenser
- POLAR PATTERN Cardioid- POLAR PATTERN Cardioid
- FREQUENCY RESPONSE 20-20,000 Hz- FREQUENCY RESPONSE 20-20,000 Hz
- OPEN CIRCUIT SENSITIVITY -33 dB (22.4 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa- OPEN CIRCUIT SENSITIVITY –37 dB (14.1 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa
- IMPEDANCE 120 ohms- IMPEDANCE 100 ohms
- MAXIMUM INPUT SOUND LEVEL 148 dB SPL, 1 kHz at 1% T.H.D.; 158 dB SPL, with 10 dB pad (nominal)- MAXIMUM INPUT SOUND LEVEL 144 dB SPL, 1 kHz at 1% T.H.D.
- NOISE 12 dB SPL- NOISE 20 dB SPL
- DYNAMIC RANGE (typical) 136 dB, 1 kHz at Max SPL- DYNAMIC RANGE (typical) 124 dB, 1 kHz at Max SPL
- SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 82 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa- SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 74 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa
- PHANTOM POWER REQUIREMENTS 11-52V DC, 3.8 mA typical- PHANTOM POWER REQUIREMENTS 48V DC, 2 mA typical
- WEIGHT 403 g (14.2 oz)- WEIGHT 12.1 oz (345 g)
- DIMENSIONS 170.0 mm (6.69") long, 52.0 mm (2.05") maximum body diameter- DIMENSIONS 6.38" (162.0 mm) long, 2.05" (52.0 mm) maximum body diameter
- OUTPUT CONNECTOR Integral 3-pin XLRM-type- OUTPUT CONNECTOR Integral 3-pin XLRM-type
- ACCESSORIES FURNISHED AT8458 shock mount for 5/8"-27 threaded stands; 5/8"-27 to 3/8"-16 threaded adapter; soft protective pouch- ACCESSORIES FURNISHED Stand mount for 5/8"-27 threaded stands; 5/8"-27 to 3/8"-16 threaded adapter; soft protective pouch
- AUDIO-TECHNICA CASE STYLE R5- AUDIO-TECHNICA CASE STYLE R7

On Audio Technica AT2035, you can find a switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter and -10 dB pad. The high-pass filter functions to attenuate the lower frequencies under 80 Hz, effectively eliminating low-frequency noises such as mechanical vibrations, wind sounds, and breath sounds. This feature is very handy especially for vocals. The high-pass filter allows vocals to be clearer and crisper. Meanwhile, when activated, the pre-attenuation pad functions to lower the volume level of the input by 10 dB. It is very handy whenever you need to handle extremely loud sounds.

Performance
The audio qualities of Audio Technica AT2020 and Audio Technica AT2035 are actually quite identical. Both mics have the frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. Hence, they both are able to deliver lows, mids, and highs very accurately. The wide frequency response range allows Audio Technica AT2020 and Audio Technica AT2035 to properly stage and define every note accurately. Also, as both are condenser mics, they also have a bright audio reproduction. However, Audio Technica AT2035 indeed has a lower self-noise level compared to Audio Technica AT2020. This property is very beneficial especially to audio recording, as the recorded audio can be clearer and crisper. Additionally, Audio Technica AT2035 is also able to handle higher SPL levels than Audio Technica AT2020.

Don’t forget that these mics are cardioid. The polar pattern allows them to focus on the sounds coming from the front while rejecting the sounds from the sides and rear. Such design is suitable for various purposes, from studio recordings to live performances.

Audio Technica AT2035 Vs AT2020

- Large diaphragm for smooth, natural sound and low noise
- High SPL handling and wide dynamic range provide unmatched versatility
- Custom shock mount provides superior isolation
- Switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter and 10 dB pad
- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of sounds from the sides and rear, improving isolation of desired sound source
- Standard AT2020Condenser microphone and bonus pop filter makes for great digital recording
- Ideal for project/home-studio applications
- High SPL handling and wide dynamic range provide unmatched versatility
- Custom-engineered low-mass diaphragm provides extended frequency response and superior transient response
- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of sounds from the sides and rear, improving isolation of desired sound source

Conclusion
Obviously, Audio Technica AT2035 is the more superior product here. The lower self-noise level is great for improving the recording quality, while the high-pass filter and pre-attenuation pad can be very handy features. However, if you are confident that you are not going to use the two features, you can save some money with Audio Technica AT2020.

MXL 770 Vs AT2020 Comparison

The prices of MXL 770 and Audio-Technica AT2020 on the market are quite similar to each other. As the two products are both condenser microphones, a lot of potential buyers often get confused in choosing between them. Neither MXL nor Audio-Technica should be underestimated, as these companies have manufactured various high-quality products that have received a lot of positive responses from the users. So, what are the differences between MXL 770 and Audio-Technica AT2020? Which is the mic that you should get?

MXL 770 Vs AT2020

Tonal Characteristics
As both MXL 770 and Audio-Technica AT2020 are condenser microphones, they share some similar characteristics. As you may have expected from condenser mics, they are both typically quite bright in audio reproduction. They can capture excellent details and accurate tones, with decent clarity and pleasant crispiness. Also, they both require the 48V phantom power in order to operate. They both are cardioid, which means that they pick up sounds the best from the front, while attenuating the sides and especially the rear. (See also: MXL V67G Vs MXL 770)

Technical Specs

MXL 770AT2020
- Frequency Range: 30Hz-20kHz- Frequency Range: 20-20,000 Hz
-Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Cardioid
- Sensitivity: 15mV/Pa- –37 dB (14.1 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms- Output Impedance: 100 ohms
- Equivalent Noise: 20dB (A weighted IEC 268-4)- NOISE: 20 dB SPL
- S/N Ratio: 74dB (Ref. 1Pa A-weighted)- SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 74 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa
- Power Requirements: 48V phantom power (+/- 4V)- PHANTOM POWER REQUIREMENTS 48V DC, 2 mA typical
- Size: 59mm x 158mm/2.32 in. x 6.22 in. - Weight: 1 lb/453.59g- DIMENSIONS: 6.38" (162.0 mm) long, - 2.05" (52.0 mm) maximum body diameter

However, like many other MXL mics, MXL 770 can be very bright. It is certainly brighter than Audio-Technica AT2020, to the point where it may sound a little bit too raw at times. This is good for weak vocals and instruments that struggle to keep their presence in the music. However, for louder sounds and more powerful voices, it may sound too harsh. Though, MXL 770 can indeed handle louder voices than Audio-Technica AT2020, as MXL 770 has a slightly higher maximum SPL handling of 144 dB, compared to Audio-Technica AT2020’s 137 dB max SPL handling.

On the other hand, Audio-Technica AT2020 can be quite more versatile than MXL 770. Audio-Technica AT2020 comes with a wider frequency response range than MXL 770. Audio-Technica AT2020 has a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, while MXL 770 comes with a frequency response range of 30 Hz – 20 kHz. As you can see, Audio-Technica AT2020 is especially able to reach lower frequencies. As the effect, it can deliver better bass performance, with fuller and more solid lows. The slightly smoother audio reproduction is suitable for a variety of vocal types.

Additional Features
Perhaps you would like to know that MXL 770 is a little bit heavier than Audio-Technica AT2020. MXL 770 is also slightly bulkier to the sides, though Audio-Technica AT2020 is the taller one.

Coincidentally, both mics have similar self-noise levels. They each has an equivalent noise level of 20dB-A, which is not too noisy and acceptable for professional purposes.

MXL 770 is also equipped with some additional features: a pre-attenuation pad and a high-pass filter. The pre-attenuation pad can be switched on to -10 dB to tame down excessively loud voices. Meanwhile, the high-pass filter is switchable to attenuate sounds under 150 Hz with an attenuation of 6dB/octave.

MXL 770 Vs AT2020

- Gold-sputtered, 6-micron, low distortion diaphragm
- FET preamp with balanced output
- Switchable bass cut and -10dB pad
- Legendary MXL sonic characteristics
- Comes with shock mount and rugged carrying case
- The price/performance standard in side-address studio condenser microphone technology
- Ideal for project/home-studio applications
- High SPL handling and wide dynamic range provide unmatched versatility
- Custom-engineered low-mass diaphragm provides extended frequency response and superior transient response
- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of sounds from the sides and rear, improving isolation of desired sound source

Conclusion
While the two are very similar to each other and perhaps are both quite versatile, MXL 770 is more suitable for rap and female vocals, in which the brightness can create a good audio effect. On the other hand, Audio-Technica AT2020 is more suitable for different vocal types and instruments. For naturally lower voices, Audio-Technica AT2020 is the better choice here due to the lower edge of its frequency response range.

AKG C214 Vs AT4040 Comparison

Two popular condenser mics on the market, AKG C214 and Audio-Technica AT4040, often cause people to get confused when choosing for the right microphone for their works. The two products are currently available in the same price range, with a very marginal price difference between them. Furthermore, they do share a lot of similar configurations and features. Needless to say, two different microphone models tend to have each own typical characteristics and distinctions, no matter how many similarities that they share with each other. These unique features are the factors to consider in choosing the right mic that can suit your needs and requirements best. So, what are the differences between AKG C214 and Audio-Technica AT4040?

AKG C214 Vs AT4040

Performance and Output Quality
Both AKG C214 and Audio-Technica AT4040 are condenser microphones. As the effect, like many other condenser microphones, the two tend to produce bright and crisp sounds. These are the characteristics that people love about condenser mics, especially the people who want to preserve the original tones, colors, and details of the sounds. If we delve a little bit further, AKG C214 and Audio-Technica AT4040 both have the same frequency response range, 20 Hz- 20 kHz. They are able to capture the same lows, mids, and highs. They also have quite similar levels of sensitivity and noise. They are quite sensitive to subtle sounds, but not excessively. They are also very quite; you can get a crystal-clear recording quality with either model. (Read also: AKG C214 Vs Rode NT1A Comparison)

Technical Specs

AKG C214Audio-Technica AT4040
- Audio Frequency bandwidth 20 to 20000 Hz- FREQUENCY RESPONSE: 20-20,000 Hz
- Sensitivity 20 mV/Pa- Sensitivity -32 dB (25.1 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa
- Equivalent Noise Level 13 dB-A- Equivalent Noise Level 12 dB SPL
- Signal to Noise 81 dB-A- SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 82 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa
- Electrical Impedance 200 Ohms- IMPEDANCE: 100 ohms

However, if we put the two mics into tests, we can indeed notice some distinctions in the audio reproduction. Between the two, AKG C214 seems to tame the high frequencies quite more significantly than Audio-Technica AT4040. This is good for suppressing aggressive spiky notes. However, this may also affect negatively in a sense that AKG C214 sounds kind of flat. For recording some instruments, as an example, you may want to keep the energetic frequency response at high-end. AKG C214 also suppresses the bass slightly more than Audio-Technica AT4040.

Features
Another interesting thing is that the two mics come with similar yet different additional features. Each of them comes with switchable pre-attenuation pad and bass-cut filter. However, AKG C214 comes with a -20dB pre-attenuation pad and a 160 Hz bass-cut filter, while Audio-Technica AT4040 offers a -10dB pad and 80 Hz filter. With all the pre-attenuation pads switched on, both products have similar maximum SPL handling.

Additionally, AKG C214 boasts a superbly durable all-metal die-cast body with shock and scratch resistance. It has an integrated suspension for reducing physical noises and vibrations. Audio-Technica AT4040 is also well-known as a rugged heavy-duty mic, featuring a custom shock mount for superior isolation and nickel-plated internal components.

AKG C214 Vs AT4040

- Technically-advanced large diaphragm tensioned specifically to provide smooth, natural sonic characteristics
- Externally polarized (DC bias) true condenser design, Exceptionally low noise, wide dynamic range and high-SPL capability for greatest versatility
- Transformerless circuitry virtually eliminates low-frequency distortion and provides superior correlation of high-speed transients
- Precision-machined, nickel-plated brass, acoustic element baffle provides enhanced element stability and optimal sensitivity
- State-of-the-art surface-mount electronics ensure compliance with A-T's stringent consistency and reliability standards
- Sonic character of the C414 XLII for beautifully detailed recording of lead vocals and solo instruments
- Outstanding dynamic range and ultralow noise for close-up recording of high-output sources of up to 156dB SPL
- Switchable 20dB attenuator and bass-cut filter for close-up recording and reduction of proximity effect
- Integrated suspension to reduce mechanical noise and vibration from stage
- Roadworthy design all-metal die-cast body with shock- and scratch-resistant finish

Conclusion
Both mics are excellent products, for sure. You can’t really go wrong with either mic. However, for vocals that are thin or reedy, you may prefer AKG C214, as it is capable of taming excessive treble voices. Audio-Technica AT4040 is the way for a more versatile mic that can be used for both vocals and instruments.