Browse Category: Blue Microphones

Audio Technica ATR2500 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Audio Technica ATR2500 vs Blue Yeti are budget-friendly USB microphones that are suitable for home recording, podcasting, and voice-over uses. They are available in a similar price range, with Audio Technica ATR2500 being slightly more affordable than Blue Yeti. So, which is better for you to choose? Continue reading below to see the differences and comparisons between these two microphones.

In this article, we will discuss about:
– The size, weight, and portability of each mic,
– The distinctive features of Audio Technica ATR2500 vs Blue Yeti,
– The comparison of their sound quality, and
– Which USB microphone that is more recommended in the end.

Size and Weight
If you need a portable USB mic that you can carry along in any trip or travel, Audio Technica ATR2500 is probably a better option. This microphone comes with a significantly slimmer, lighter body. It has a simple tubular shape, and it comes with a foldable stand that is lightweight and practical. You can easily put everything that you need to work with this mic into your bag. See also: Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is pretty portable – you can easily move it around in your studio room. However, it is not really suitable for a trip or travel. It is quite bigger and heavier. The integrated stand is particularly bulky, so it will take a lot of space if put in your bag. This mic is more suitable for usage in a studio room.

Techical Specs

Audio Technica ATR2500Blue Yeti
- Element : Condenser- Capsules : condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response : 30-15,000 Hz- Frequency Response : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Sample Rate : 44.1 kHz/48 kHz- Sample Rate : 48kHz
- Bit Depth : 16 bit- Bit Rate : 16bit

Pickup Pattern
Both Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti are side-address mics. In other words, you speak into the side of the mic, not to the top. However, there is a distinction with their polar patterns. Audio Technica ATR2500 only has a cardioid polar pattern – which is generally not a problem, as cardioid is the most commonly used for various purposes.

Blue Yeti has four selectable polar patterns, which include cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo. Hence, with Blue Yeti, you can adapt to different recording conditions. The bidirectional pattern is nice for interviews, and the stereo pattern is quite useful when you want to create a stereo track. However, cardioid is the one that you will mainly use in most cases. You can find out more about this mic from the manufacturer, Blue Microphones, here.

Other Features
Each of these two microphones comes with a headphone port for zero-latency direct monitoring. Each has a dedicated headphone volume control, so you can adjust the volume for monitoring without altering the actual input that is being recorded.

However, Blue Yeti comes with two additional features that are not available on Audio Technica ATR2500. First, this mic has a mute button, which may come to be very handy for controlling the recording. You just need to hit the button to pause the recording instead of toying with the software, and hit it again when you are ready to continue. Second, this mic also has a gain control, which is nice for adjusting the input level.

Sound Quality
Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti both record in 16-bit/48kHz. Generally, they both sound good. They can capture sound with very good accuracy, sharpness, and detail. Audio Technica ATR2500 does have a lower self-noise level, but Blue Yeti is not really worse. On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a wider frequency response range that can capture more high-end and low-end.

Audio Technica ATR2500 Vs Blue Yeti

- Side-address condenser microphone with USB output for easy connection to your computer
- Ideal for podcasting, home studio recording, field recording, and voiceover use
- Built-in headphone jack allows you to directly monitor your microphone output without audible delay
- Adjust headphone volume with easy-to-use controls on the front of the microphone
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation.
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo.
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output.
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls

Conclusion
Between these two mics, we recommend you to choose Blue Yeti. It is more versatile with multiple polar patterns. The mute button and gain control are very handy. The sound quality is about as good as Audio Technica ATR2500. It actually has a wider frequency response range, which means that it can capture more high-end and low-end.

Shure MV5 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Shure MV5 and Blue Yeti are interesting options for a USB mic. Both of these microphones can be used with your computer via USB. However, they offer very different advantages. Shure MV5 is more portable, whereas Blue Yeti is adjustable for different desktop conditions. See the detailed comparisons of Shure MV5 vs Blue Yeti below!

By reading the following article, you will find out more about:
– The unique features available on Shure MV5 vs Blue Yeti,
– The supported connections and platforms of the two mics,
– The comparisons of their sound quality, and
– Which mic that is more recommended for the money.

Size and Weight
Perhaps the first thing that you need to consider when choosing between these two microphones is their dimensions. Do you need your mic to be highly portable? If so, Shure MV5 is more suitable for you. Unlike the competitor here, Shure MV5 is very compact and lightweight. The actual mic is shaped like a ball while featuring a grille that looks just like the famous Elvis mic. The mic comes with a stand that is also quite compact and lightweight.

The mic’s position on the stand is adjustable. Also, you can just remove the stand when it is not used. So, the whole thing is very practical and adaptable. The controls are near the bottom of the mic with the connection ports. See the complete review here: Shure MV5 Review.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is more suitable for desktop usage. The mic’s stand, although adjustable, is not very portable. It is rather bulky and somewhat heavier. Still, the build quality is very good. The housing feels sturdy and durable. Blue Yeti also looks stylish. There are several color choices, such as black, silver, platinum, blue, teal, red, and slate.

Technical Specs

Shure MV5Blue Yeti
- Type : Condenser- Capsules : condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response : 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz- Frequency Response : 20Hz - 20kHz

Features
If you work with Apple devices, Shure MV5 may be better due to the Lightning connector. This mic has both Lightning and USB connectors, so it is very versatile. According to Shure, this mic can work with PC, Mac, Android, and iOS. It also has the Apple MFi certification, ensuring full compatibility with any iOS device.

Shure MV5 has a cardioid polar pattern, which means that it captures sound signals from the front. There are three built-in DSP presets (vocal, instrument, flat) that are useful for enhancing the sound quality in different applications. There is a headphone output for direct monitoring, too.

Blue Yeti uses USB. It is compatible with Windows and Mac OS X platforms. Some users say that it also works on some Linux distros and Android (the Android platform needs to support USB OTG). However, it doesn’t work with iPad or iOS.

Blue Yeti comes with four selectable polar patterns, which include cardioid, stereo, omnidirectional, and bidirectional. These polar patterns allow you to adjust the mic to have the best pickup in different conditions. For example, cardioid is great when there is just one person talking, whereas bidirectional is useful for dialogues and interviews. There are headphone output, mute button, and gain control.

Sound Quality
In terms of sound quality, the two mics are really comparable to each other, so you are not going to miss an important advantage. In general, both mics sound clear and detailed. Shure MV5 may become more musical and more pleasant to hear if you use either the vocal or the instrument DSP preset. However, Blue Yeti does offer excellent accuracy and tonality, too.

Shure MV5 Vs Blue Yeti

- 3 DSP Preset Modes (Vocals, Flat, Instrument)
- Automatically applies gain, EQ, compression and limiting for optimal results
- Built-in headphone output for real-time monitoring
- Custom-tuned microphone capsule provides best-in-class audio
- Available in 2 colors gray with black foam and black with red foam
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output. Dimensions (extended in stand) : 4.72 x 4.92 x 11.61 inches
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls
- Compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8 (including 8.1), Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP

Conclusion
Choosing between Shure MV5 and Blue Yeti is indeed difficult, but in the end, Shure MV5 is the winner. It is slightly better in terms of value. It is more portable, and it has multiple connectivity options. It can work with a wide range of platforms, including mobile devices. The sound quality is good, too.

Razer Seiren Pro Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Razer Seiren Pro and Blue Yeti are two mics suitable for a wide range of applications, from digital recording, podcasting, to streaming. Both products come from renowned companies. However, Razer Seiren Pro is quite more expensive than Blue Yeti. So, which one is better? See the comparisons between Razer Seiren Pro vs Blue Yeti below for the answer.

Below, you can read the information about:
– Which one between the two mics that has better sound quality,
– Which one that has better features and easier usage, and
– Which one that gives the best value for the money.

Design
These two mics have quite different airs around them. Razer Seiren Pro has a more modern and contemporary vibe. It comes with a squarish shape. The construction does look rugged and durable. One nice thing about Razer Seiren Pro is that you can see the currently selected pickup pattern on the OLED display on the front. The gain adjustment is also on the front and is easier to access. Razer Seiren Pro comes with a braided cable which is durable.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a more classical vibe with the rounded shape. The housing feels sturdy, but the included cable is a traditional one that isn’t braided. The pickup pattern selector and the gain adjustment are on the rear, so it is somewhat less practical to use. See also: Razer Seiren vs Razer Seiren Pro.

Technical Specs

Razer Seiren ProBlue Yeti
- Microphone Operation Mode : cardioid / omni-directional / bi-directional (switchable)- Polar Patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response : 20 Hz- Frequency Response: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Max Sound Pressure : 120 dB- Sample Rate: 48kHz

Features
Razer Seiren Pro and Blue Yeti come with similar features. This is why they often get compared against each other. Each of them has four selectable polar patterns, which are cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo. These selectable polar patterns allow for great versatility to adapt to different recording situations.

Each of the two mics also comes with a gain control, mute button, and headphone output for zero-latency direct monitoring. These features make them very handy and practical. You can easily monitor the sound while recording. Note that there is no on-board volume control for the headphone output, so you may want to use a headset that has its own volume control.

Nevertheless, according to Razer’s official page, Razer Seiren Pro supports both XLR and USB. One slight problem is that the included XLR cable sometimes has issues. On the other hand, Blue Yeti only supports USB.

Sound Quality
Razer Seiren Pro and Blue Yeti have more-or-less similar sound quality. They are both good enough for streaming, podcasting, and even some vocal recording. However, they do have different characteristics.

Razer Seiren Pro tends to sound warmer and boomier. It has more bass presence. This is generally not a problem; except if you have a bassy voice, as the sound will be somewhat muddy and not very clear. On the other hand, Blue Yeti sounds more analytical and articulate. Hence, many people think that Blue Yeti is overall more accurate and detailed.

Razer Seiren Pro Vs Blue Yeti

- With an aluminum base as a stabilizer, the mic sits securely on your home or studio desktop without the need of an additional mic stand, making it perfect for recording and streaming
- Whether you’re using the mic for streaming, podcasts, voice-overs, instruments, vocals, conference calls, events, interviews or even duets, the Razer Seiren has you covered
- It can easily switch up to four different dedicated recording patterns to suit a variety of audio capture needs;Headphone amplifier: Impedance: > 16ohms;Power output (RMS): 130mW;THD: 0.009%;Frequency response: 15Hz – 22kHz;Signal-to-noise ratio: 114dB
- With zero latency output when plugged directly into the Razer Seiren, accurately monitor your recordings in real time
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation, Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output. Dimensions (extended in stand) : 4.72 x 4.92 x 11.61 inches
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls
- Compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8 (including 8.1), Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP (Home and Professional), and Mac OS X (10.4.11 or higher), and requires a minimum of 64 MB of RAM(remove existing and upload)

Conclusion
In general, Blue Yeti is more recommended because it gives more accurate and detailed sound. The performance is better, and the price is more affordable. It already has four selectable polar patterns, an adjustable gain level, and a headphone output for zero-latency monitoring.

Audio Technica ATR2100 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

You are currently looking for a USB microphone with good sound quality and features. You are now stuck between Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti. They are both good microphones, but they do come with very different features. Hence, choosing the best one depends on your needs and purposes.

In this article, you can read and find out more about:
– The two mics’ different mechanisms and polar patterns,
– The different features of Audio Technica ATR2100 vs Blue Yeti,
– The differences in their sound quality, and
– Which one is the best USB mic for the money.

Size and Weight
First of all, Audio Technica ATR2100 and Blue Yeti come with very different designs. If you prefer a typical handheld microphone, Audio Technica ATR2100 is more suitable. It has the usual shape of a mic. It measures approximately 51 mm wide and 183 mm tall, with a weight of about 268 grams. If you ever need to put it on a stand, don’t worry. A tripod desk stand and the clamp are included in the bundle.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is shorter yet a little bulkier due to having the desk stand integrated onto the mic. It measures 12 cm x 12.5 cm x 29.5 cm. One nice thing is that the mic’s position is easily adjustable. You can easily angle the mic as needed to perform. See also: Blue Spark vs Blue Yeti.

Different Polar Patterns
Audio Technica ATR2100 is specifically designed for music and field recording. As stated by Audio Technica, it comes with a cardioid polar pattern. This is a good choice for capturing sounds from a single direction (the front) while attenuating environmental noise coming from other directions.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti has four selectable polar patterns. It has cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, and omnidirectional polar patterns. Hence, it is very versatile. You can adjust the polar pattern to match the needs of different conditions, such as podcasting, field recording, and interviewing.

Technical Specs

Audio Technica ATR2100Blue Yeti
- Element: Dynamic- Capsules: condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Polar Patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response: 50-15,000 Hz- Frequency Response: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Power Requirements: USB Power (5V DC)- Max SPL: 120dB (THD: 0.5% 1kHz)
- Bit Depth: 16 bit- Bit Rate: 16bit
- Sample Rate: 44.1 kHz/48 kHz- Sample Rate: 48kHz

Connection Ports
Audio Technica ATR2100 is more versatile in terms of output capabilities. This model has two output options, USB and XLR. Thus, this mic is great if you need a mic that can perform well in a mobile setting as well as studio environment. This is also a great backup mic, as the dual connection options may prove to be handy in certain situations. By the way, there is a 3.5 mm headphone jack for direct monitoring. There is an on/off switch for easy control.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti only supports USB. It does have a 3.5 mm headphone jack with a dedicated volume control for direct monitoring. There is a mute button for controlling when to pause and continue the recording.

Sound Quality
Finally, note that these two mics use very different mechanisms. Audio Technica ATR2100 is a dynamic microphone. In general, it has a good ability to reject noise. It is also generally more durable. Hence, it is a great choice for field recording. The sound quality of Audio Technica ATR2100 is good. It is clear and accurate.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is a condenser microphone. It is very sensitive. Because of this, it usually requires a treated room with no environment noise. The overall sound quality is good; it is bright, crisp, and accurate.

Audio Technica ATR2100 Vs Blue Yeti

- Handheld dynamic microphone with USB digital output and XLR analog output
- USB output connects to your computer for digital recording, while the XLR output connects with your sound system conventional microphone input for use in live performance
- Smooth, extended frequency response ideally suited for podcasting, home studio recording, field recording, voiceover, and on-stage use
- Built-in headphone jack allows you to directly monitor your microphone output without audible delay
- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of unwanted sounds from the sides and rear
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
-Compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8 (including 8.1), Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP (Home and Professional), and Mac OS X (10.4.11 or higher), and requires a minimum of 64 MB of RAM(remove existing and upload)
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output. Dimensions (extended in stand) : 4.72 x 4.92 x 11.61 inches
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls

Conclusion
In general, Audio Technica ATR2100 is more recommended. This mic is more versatile, suitable for both field recording and studio recording. The dynamic mic and cardioid polar pattern offer a good ability to reject environmental noise. In addition, it has USB and XLR outputs.

Blue Spark Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Blue has released several great mics for different needs and purposes. However, their varying features and prices may make it difficult to choose the right one for your projects. In this article, we will see the comparisons between Blue Spark vs Blue Yeti to help you choose the best mic for the money.

Below, you can find the information that you need regarding:
– The features and advantages of Blue Spark vs Blue Yeti,
– The connections used by the two mics, and
– The recommended model for musical and professional recording.

Design
First of all, Blue Spark and Blue Yeti come with very different designs. On one hand, Blue Spark looks very unconventional. It is not exactly a good-looking mic, but it is not ugly, either. It just looks unique with the slim body and small grille. Nevertheless, this mic is very portable. You can easily bring it along when going to a gig or traveling. Note that you may need to mount it with a shock mount.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is a portable and stylish mic suitable for podcasting and interviews. The body is compact and lightweight, and it is integrated to a stand. You can easily put it on any flat surface. The mic’s position is adjustable relative to the stand, so it is very adaptable to different conditions. See also: MXL 770 vs Blue Yeti.

Technical Specs

Blue SparkBlue Yeti
- Transducer Type : Condenser, Pressure Gradient- Capsules : condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Patterns : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response : 20Hz – 20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Max SPL : 136 dB SPL (1k, THD 0.5%)- Max SPL : 120dB (THD: 0.5% 1kHz)

Connection
One important difference between these two mics is that Blue Spark uses an XLR connection, whereas Blue Yeti uses a USB connection. This difference alone may make your decision.Blue Spark is generally suitable for working in a music or recording environment. It needs +48V phantom power to operate.You may need an audio interface in order to connect it to your computer.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is a great choice if you need a simple USB mic that can connect directly to your computer. Blue says that this mic is plug-and-play and USB-powered. You can easily bring it along with your laptop for field recordings.

Features and Sound Quality
Blue Spark is designed for professional recordings. It does not come with many fancy features. It just has a cardioid polar pattern with a 100Hz low-cut filter and -20dB pad. The low-cut filter is very useful for reducing noise and improving clarity, whereas the pre-attenuation pad is nice for handling loud sounds.

Blue Spark has a maximum SPL handling of 136 dB, so it can handle a wide variety of instruments. The sound quality is very good. It can capture sounds with good accuracy and clarity.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is a versatile mic suitable for many applications. It is especially great for streaming and podcasting. It boasts four switchable polar patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo. In addition, it has an adjustable gain control and zero-latency headphone output. However, the maximum SPL handling is only 120 dB. The sound quality is generally good, but it is not as clear and rich as the Spark.

Blue Spark Vs Blue Yeti

- XLR connection integrated perfectly with USB audio interfaces and mixers
- Custom, large-diaphragm cardioid condenser capsule for superbly detailed, focused sound
- Blue’s Class-A JFET electronics deliver rich harmonic audio
- 100Hz low cut filter increases clarity, reducing rumble from your room or desk
- -20dB pad keeps your stream free of distortion when things get intense
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output. Dimensions (extended in stand) : 4.72 x 4.92 x 11.61 inches
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls
- Compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8 (including 8.1), Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP (Home and Professional), and Mac OS X (10.4.11 or higher), and requires a minimum of 64 MB of RAM(remove existing and upload)

Conclusion
For professional music recording, we recommend you to choose Blue Spark. This is a better quality mic with higher maximum SPL handling and clearer, more accurate output.

MXL 770 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

You are now looking for an affordable yet reliable condenser mic, and you are now confused between MXL 770 vs Blue Yeti. Both of these two mics are awesome, but they have very different features. These mics are designed for different purposes. MXL 770 is the way to go for vocals. Meanwhile, despite the seemingly borderless versatility, Blue Yeti is best for podcasting, dubbing, videoconferencing, and the likes. See the more detailed comparisons below.

MXL 770 Vs Blue Yeti

Design and Construction
MXL 770 is a truly beautiful mic. The black and gold color scheme is very elegant. The housing and grille are colored in black, and the upper part of the housing features a sleek golden lining. The brand and the name of the product are also written in a golden font. The construction is solid and durable. The mic comes with a nice shock mount and a well-padded carrying case. See our previous post about MXL V67G vs MXL 770 here.

Inside the mic, there is a 6-micron gold-sputtered low-distortion diaphragm for warm and clear sound. It also features a FET preamp with a balanced transformerless output. This mic requires +48V phantom power. Just like most other vocal mics, MXL 770 sports a cardioid polar pattern.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is made to be an all-purpose portable mic. It needs to connect to a power source if you want to use it, but it can be powered by a USB connection so that you can simply plug it to your laptop or desktop computer. The overall size is slim and compact, and the mic is readily integrated to a nice adjustable stand. It is equipped with a tri-capsule array, and the polar pattern is adjustable with four options: cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, and omnidirectional.

Technical Specs

MXL 770Blue Yeti
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Polar Patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Range: 30Hz-20kHz- Frequency Response: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Sensitivity: 15mV/Pa- Sample Rate: 48kHz

Performance
As mentioned in the beginning, MXL 770 vs Blue Yeti mics have different pros and cons that make them more suitable for different purposes. MXL 770 comes with a wider frequency range which goes from 30 Hz to 20 kHz. So, it is able to capture more accurate sound signals. Despite being considered as an entry-level mic, MXL 770 offers great overall performance. It produces natural low-end sound and crisp high-end. The crispness and clarity make it a great mic for rapping and female vocals. It is also great for podcasting and recording instruments.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a narrower frequency response range of 40 Hz – 18 kHz. Nevertheless, this is a very good mic. It is solid, stable, and convenient. If you hate the whole XLR setup and prefer a plug-and-play solution, this mic is the answer. The mute button and zero-latency headphone jack will be very handy at times.

Blue Yeti is a jack of all trades; it can be used for various tasks and deliver good results. But there are still some things to consider. First, it is extremely sensitive that it will pick up everything, including wind and breathing noise. Second, it does not have a good place to connect a pop filter.

MXL 770 Vs Blue Yeti

- Multipurpose small-diaphragm microphone
- Warm sound with extra clarity at the top end
- FET preamp with balanced, transformerless output
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output.

Conclusion
If you are going to use the mic primarily for vocals or instruments, MXL 770 would be better. The overall performance is better, especially for rapping, female vocals, and people with high voices. The natural low-end sound is great. However, Blue Yeti can be the alternative if you need a versatile mic for podcasting, dubbing, videoconferencing, or if you simply prefer a plug-and-play mic.

Rode NT1A Vs Blue Bluebird Comparison

Rode NT1A and Blue Bluebird is a type of microphone in addition to record sound in the studio, it also serves as a speaker is particularly used on circles choirs will perform in a show. However, the strength of the mic where between Rode NT1A vs. Blue Bluebird which has the best performance? Let’s see review below.

Rode NT1A vs Blue Bluebird

Rode NT1A
Rode NT1A vs AT2020 is the very first comparison for this mic for your information and we still follow the next. The Rode NT1A has one inch cardioid condenser microphone. It becomes an industry standard, delivers the warmth, extends dynamic range, clarity and high SPL capability typically only featured on some of the world’s most expensive microphones. With a self-noise level of only 5dBA it is recognized along with the current one as the world’s quietest studio microphones as it claims. The low noise makes it an ideal for vocal microphone as well as perfect for recording guitars and percussion at a time. Packaging is including the ‘Complete Vocal Recording Solution’ and everything you need in the NT1A to get a very professional vocal recording and is very ideal for home studio recording. A studio grade pop shield and shock mount is included, along with a premium 20 microphone cable, dust cover, and an instructional DVD packed with recording tips. The Rode NT1A large diaphragm 1 inch cardioid condenser microphone is designed and made in Australia and also covered by Rode Microphones’ industry leading 10 year warranty. (Have a look : Rode NT1A Vs NT2A Comparison)

Technical Specs

Rode NT1ABlue Bluebird
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : Cardioid
- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz – 20kHz
- Sensitivity : -31.9dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB - Sensitivity : 28.5 mV/Pa at 1 kHz (1 pa = 94 dB SPL)
- Output Impedance : 100Ω- Output Impedance : 50 ohm

Blue Bluebird
The Blue Bluebird SL large-diaphragm cardioid condenser microphone can capture every nuance of the sound. It produces high-frequency clarity, smooth mid frequencies, and rich lows that make your tracks will sound better in recording too. Record electric guitars with presence and acoustic guitars with an incredible detail. Throw up a pair and capture the full power of a drum kit. The Bluebird microphone offers excellent off-axis rejection, it might be thanked to the unusually tight cardioid polar pattern. A highpass filter minimizes mud and rumble, while a 20dB pad effectively handles loud sources. There is an excellent hard worker mic for any studio, Blue Bluebird SL large diaphragm cardioid condenser microphone provides accurate presence and transparency for any sound or instrument. Bluebird SL is versatile enough to capture anything with excellent results. This is a true worker.

Rode NT1A Vs Blue Bluebird

- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Cardioid polar pattern
- Self Noise of only 5 dB (A)
- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry
- Blue's famous cutting-edge design
- Cardioid polar pattern
- Class A discrete amplifier circuit
- Complete package, including shock mount and pop filter

Conclusion
Rode NT1A would be a good pick for a different tone flavor. But, by purchasing Bluebird is better microphone for voice applications which is a good microphone for acoustical projects, but with not the best vocals. Once you will buy it you will not part ways with it.

Rode NT1A Vs Blue Spark Comparison

The best microphone you will get if you are selective in choosing a wide variety of microphone that’s been widely circulating in the market. Microphone is one of the important thing that should be available in the recording studio, as it will be the main input source when will do the recording. Therefore, you should understand in advance and ensure the microphone is like what you want to buy so you don’t buy the wrong. A good quality microphone will be proportional to the resulting recording, so you should be careful in choosing. Competition in the market make the microphone from Rode NT1A Blue Spark and become competitors of each other. Because, in terms of the features they may have some similarities and a decision to buy one of them depending on the difference between them because it could be that the real need is you want.

Rode NT1A Vs Blue Spark

Rode NT1A
Rode NT1A is a condenser Microphone for home recording. This microphone is so quiet so that we are able to pick up very subtle nuances of the guitar playing for example then the recorded guitar performance simply sounded amazing to our ears. It has a touch of EQ to emphasize the low end which make a great performer sound even better in the studio. While for the vocals, Rode NT1A fits the bill for the singer-songwriter with its clear sound and adds a sparkle that allow the singer’s voice to stand out right in front of the mix, the mic will capture details in voice that just is not present in other models of microphones. The vocals are given by this mic will be the most presence and clarity out of all the microphones. Not only that, the sound is also perfect for hip hop and rap vocal, because it makes the voice recordings easy to EQ. Even for a simple homemade acoustic shield, it will improve the quality of recordings you get from the Rode NT1A. (Read also : Rode NT1A Vs NT2A Comparison)

Techninacl Specs

Rode NT1ABlue Spark
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : Cardioid
- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz – 20kHz
- Output Impedance : 100Ω- Output Impedance : 50 ohm
- Sensitivity : -31.9dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB- Sensitivity : 34.9 mV/Pa at 1 kHz (1 pa = 94 dB SPL)

Blue Spark
Blue Microphone Spark is a cardioid-only, wooden box and ships FET-based studio with a shock-mount and condenser microphone. The shape of this mic is lollipop look alike with orange color surrounded the body. It is made by 25 mm-diameter capsule has a 4-micron-thick, nickel-sputtered diaphragm and is mounted in a soft-rubber isolating sleeve “tuned” to dampen its mass. There are two switchable response curves that are toggled in or out by a flush-mounted puchbutton at the back. It can change the capsule’s input driver rather than the signal output of the microphone. This mic exhibits a response curve characterized by a lift between 8 kHz until 12 kHz with also the focus button with the same response except for a roll-off starting just above. It is an essential to use the included windscreen for most close vocals, but plan to supplement it with a secondary screen for singers who are big mic poppers. You can use Spark to record two different acoustic guitars and two ukuleles. And with a good squash provided by the Tube-Tech, the sound was marvelous.

Rode NT1A Vs Blue Spark

- The World's Quietest Studio Condenser Microphone
- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry
- Redesigned version of RØDE's classic NT1 has only 5 dBA of self-noise
- Features Blue Microphones premium condenser capsule, delivering low noise, high efficiency, and rapid response in any recording situation
- Designed with Focus Control, which results in a tighter, more direct and focused sound when selected
- Utilizes custom-matched circuitry with professional-quality, Class-A discrete components
- Circuit design pairs Spark's condenser capsule with a phantom-powered outboard amplifier to drive the capsule with linear control and accuracy

Conclusion
If you think that you will not spend an excess on a Rode NT1A because it is much less and there is a cheaper alternative that is still close to the recording quality, you can choose the Blue Spark microphone. But, by the higher price, you will get more too especially knowing that Rode NT1A is clean for its worth and has pretty much zero back-tone.

Razer Seiren Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Are you in a disquiet because you are unable to choose between Razer Seiren and Blue Yeti? Both products are heavily popular USB microphones available on the market. In general, the two are considered to be from the same price range, as you can get either of them with a budget under two hundred bucks, but you may want to know that Razer Serien is usually a little bit pricier than Blue Yeti. Both Razer Seiren and Blue Yeti are considered high-quality, suitable for a variety of purposes, from mobile recording to game streaming. So, how do they actually compare to each other? Which is the one that you should choose? Let’s see the comparisons!

razer-seiren-vs-blue-yeti

Design and Feature
Quite interestingly, both models come with some similar design and features. Both mics, of course, connect to a computer device via USB. Both are plug-and-play devices, which means that the two can work with your computer right away without needing you to configure any confusing driver software. Each also has a zero-latency headphone output jack for direct monitoring, which is important if you want to have the utmost control and precision over the recording. (See also: Razer Seiren Vs Razer Seiren Pro)

Technical Specs

Razer SeirenBlue Yeti
- Power required / consumption: 5V 500mA (USB) - Power Required/Consumption: 5V 150mA
- Sample rate: 192kHz- Sample Rate: 48 kHz
- Bit rate: 24bit - Bit Rate: 16-bit
- Capsules: Three 14mm condenser capsules - Capsules: 3 Blue-proprietary 14mm condenser capsules
- Polar patterns: Cardioid, stereo, omnidirectional, bidirectional - Polar Patterns: Cardioid, Bidirectional, Omnidirectional, Stereo
- Frequency response: 20Hz – 20kHz - Frequency Response: 20Hz - 20kHz

Both Razer Seiren and Blue Yeti feature multiple polar patterns. They both can be configured to be cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, or stereo, making these mics very flexible and versatile for various purposes and conditions. The internal components are also similar, as they each is powered by three 14 mm condenser capsules to do the job.

Razer Seiren comes with dedicated headphone volume control and mic gain control, allowing you to adjust the volume level of your monitoring without altering the actual input level. In addition, there is the Razer Synapse app, through which you can furtherly adjust and customize the mic. On the other hand, Blue Yeti also features a gain control, but has no dedicated headphone volume control. Instead, it features a mute button, which can be very handy for starting and stopping your recording.

Performance and Output Quality
Even though there are quite some similarities between the two products, they are quite different in terms of performance and output quality. Multiple tests have shown that Razer Seiren has better sensitivity and tonal accuracy than Blue Yeti. They both have a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, also a maximum SPL handling of 120 dB with 0.5% THD at 1 kHz. However, compared to Blue Yeti, Razer Seiren captures fuller, more accurate, and more detailed sounds. Lows are defined more properly, while the mids and highs are crisp and clear.

In addition, Razer Seiren also records in a better quality than Blue Yeti. Whereas Blue Yeti records in the standard 16-bit/48kHz, Razer Seiren offers an improved recording quality with the 24-bit/192kHz maximum resolution. With the better bit rate and higher sample rate, of course, Razer Seiren produces more superior digital audio files, with more accuracy and subtle details.

Razer Seiren Vs Blue Yeti

- HD recording with outstanding clarity
- 4 adjustable recording patterns (Cardioid, Stereo, Omni, Bi-directional)
- Quick controls for pattern switching, headphone volume and mic gain
- Built-in headphone amplifier with zero latency output
- Plug and play recording via single USB connection
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls
- Plug 'n play - Mac OS X (10.4.11 or higher) and PC (Windows 8.1, 8, 7, Vista, XP)

Conclusion
All in all, Razer Seiren makes the best way to go. The primary reason, of course, the better audio quality. The controllability it offers is also excellent, while the Razer Synapse app becomes a nice plus point.

Samson Go Mic Vs Blue Snowball Comparison

Are you looking for a truly decent and reliable USB condenser microphone? Such equipment is crucial if you are a very busy and mobile person, and your job requires a mic that can be brought along throughout the day. For such case, Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball are two feasible choices. Both products are heavily popular on the market, each boasting lots of positive reviews from the users. In a prior article, we have ever compared Samson Go Mic to the sibling of Blue Snowball, Blue Yeti, as well. Since Blue Yeti is also a USB condenser mic, don’t forget to take a look at the article as well!

Samson Go Mic Vs Blue Snowball

Design
For sure, both Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball are very compact, lightweight, and portable. Even so, of course, they are designed quite differently and distinctively. Samson Go Mic is rectangular-shaped and is slim enough to allow you to easily slip it into your pocket or any spare space available in your pocket. It comes with a clip stand that allows you to clip it to a laptop or stand comfortably on a desk.

On the other hand, Blue Snowball, as the name suggests, is shaped like a ball. Thus, it is perhaps quite bulky and not convenient to be put in your pocket. It comes with a detachable foot stand. The foot stand is also foldable for easy and convenient storage and travel.

Technical Specs

Samson Go MicBlue Snowball
-Type: Condenser Microphone- Transducer Type: Condenser, Pressure Gradient With USB digital output
-Frequency Response 20 - 18000 Hz- Frequency Response: 40 –18 kHz
- 16-bit, 44.1kHz resolution- Sample/word Rate: 44.1 kHz/16 bit
- Item Weight: 8 ounces- Item Weight: 1.8 pounds
- Product Dimensions 6 x 1 x 5 inches- Product Dimensions 10.6 x 9.1 x 5.5 inches

Feature
Both models offer multiple polar patterns. Samson Go Mic can be set cardioid or omnidirectional, depending on the task at hand. A cardioid polar pattern will focus capturing sounds coming from the front, while slightly attenuating the sides and significantly attenuating the rear. An omnidirectional polar pattern picks up sounds from all angles. On the other hand, Blue Snowball also has both cardioid mode and omnidirectional mode, but there is a switchable -10dB pre-attenuation pad in the cardioid mode, allowing you to capture loud sounds with more fidelity. Both Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball are USB-powered. They consume power directly via the USB connection, so they have no battery to recharge.

Sound Quality
Both Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball both record in 16-bit/44.1-kHz resolution. Even though a lot of people initially thought that Blue Snowball has better audio quality due to the slightly higher price, this is not always the case. Putting the two models to real tests, Samson Go Mic has proven to deliver better sounds than Blue Snowball. The sounds are clearer, more accurate, more articulate. Apparently, the issue with Blue Snowball is due to the shorter frequency response range. Blue Snowball only has a frequency response range of 40 Hz – 18 kHz. The bass seems to slightly muddle the mids and highs. On the other hand, Samson Go Mic has a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 18 kHz. The bass is more solid and does not get muddled with mids and highs as much.

Samson Go Mic vs Blue Snowball

- Portable USB condenser microphone
- Plug and Play Mac and PC compatible, no drivers required
- Custom compact design that clips to a laptop or sits on a desk
- Perfect for recording music, podcasting and field recording
- Ideal for voice recognition software, iChat, VoIP and web casting
- Custom condenser capsule offers crystal clear audio for Skype, Messages and FaceTime
- Record vocals, create podcasts, and add narration to your home movies
- Add crystal clear audio to recordings for YouTube
- Easy plug and play directly to your Mac or PC-no drivers to install
- Ships with desktop stand and USB cable

Conclusion
Even though Blue Snowball has a -10dB pre-attenuation pad, the other aspects are not as good as Samson Go Mic. For the most convenient design and the best recording quality, Samson Go Mic is the way to go.

  • 1
  • 2