Browse Category: Neumann

Shure KSM9 Vs Neumann KMS 105 Comparison

A microphone for live performances needs to have good sound quality, but at the same time it should be able to avoid capturing environmental noise. Hence, finding a good microphone for such purpose is often tricky and confusing. No worries! Below, we will help you choose between two popular mics for live applications, Shure KSM9 vs Neumann KMS 105.

These are high-class mics available in a similar price range. At first, they may seem identical. However, there are some distinctive differences that set them apart. Below, you can find out more about:
– The different sound characters of the two microphones,
– The features of Shure KSM9 vs Neumann KMS 105, and
– Which mic that is more reliable and easier to use in live settings.

Design and Features
First of all, both Shure KSM9 and Neumann KMS 105 come with dual polar patterns. Each of them has two selectable polar patterns, cardioid and supercardioid. This allows for great versatility in adapting to different environments. The cardioid polar pattern is generally good enough for solo performances. The supercardioid polar pattern has a narrower pickup angle, so it may be handy when there are other performers on the stage.

Shure KSM9 is available in two color choices, champagne and charcoal gray. It claims to have premium-grade electronic components and gold-plated internal and external connectors for the best durability and sound quality. The output connector is XLR, but there is a wireless model is available. It comes with an advanced suspension shock mount that does a very good job. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs AKG C414.

Neumann KMS 105 is also available in two color choices, nickel and matte black. It comes in a robust metal housing that has been optimized to reduce handling noise. The bundle also includes a stand mount, which is handy and useful. According to Neumann, this mic has a transformerless output, and the pop shielding is said to be effective in reducing plosives and wind noise without any side effect on the sound quality.

Technical Specs

Shure KSM9Neumann KMS 105
- Directional Polar Patterns: Cardioid, Supercardioid- Directional Pattern : Cardioid / Supercardioid
- Frequency Response: 50 to 20,000 Hz- Frequency Range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms (actual)- Rated impedance : 50 ohms
- Sensitivity (typical; at 1000 Hz; 1 Pa = 94 dB SPL): -51 dBV/Pa- Maximum SPL for THD : 150 dB

Sound Quality
One distinctive advantage of Shure KSM9 is that it is quite less sensitive than Neumann KMS 105. The lower sensitivity allows Shure KSM9 to focus on the user’s voice without picking up any sound from other directions. Because of this, Shure KSM9 is much easier to use when there are other singers or instruments on the stage.

On the other hand, Neumann KMS 105 is quite more sensitive. This may be a good thing for a solo performance, when there are no other sound signals on the stage. However, using Neumann KMS 105 when there are other performers may be difficult and frustrating due to the mic picking up other sound signals.

Nevertheless, both mics have good sound accuracy. Shure KSM9 tends to be a little brighter, whereas Neumann KMS 105 has better bass depth due to the wider frequency response range. Both mics have very high maximum SPL, and they can easily handle loud voices without clipping.

Shure KSM9 Vs Neumann KMS 105

- Zippered carrying case
- Dual gold layered, low-mass Mylar diaphragm design
- Switchable polar patterns (supercardioid and cardioid)
- Advanced suspension shock mount
- Neumann sound on stage
- Highly detailed condenser mic for demanding on stage applications
- Robust metal housing reduces handling noise
- Includes stand mount and padded nylon bag

Conclusion
Between the two mics, we recommend you to choose Shure KSM9. It is quite easier to use, especially when there are other sounds on the stage. It does not pick up environmental noise. The features are similar to Neumann KMS 105, such as the dual selectable polar patterns and high SPL handling.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs AKG C414 Comparison

Neumann TLM 102 serves as an affordable model suitable for people looking for an entry-level Neumann mic. It is considered by many as a good product to introduce people to the superior quality of Neumann mics. On the other hand, AKG C414 is a more expensive condenser mic, but the features and capabilities are very interesting. Which one should you get? Read the comparisons of Neumann TLM 102 vs AKG C414 below for the answer.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs AKG C414

Design
Neumann TLM 102 comes with a compact yet durable construction, however it doesn’t lose the distinctive Neumann design character. It has a length of about 116 mm and a diameter of 52 mm. It is very lightweight at about 210 grams. It is a large-diaphragm microphone with a pressure gradient transducer, featuring a transformerless circuitry. See also our previous post about Neumann TLM 102 vs U87 here!

On the other hand, AKG C414 is slightly bigger and heavier. It measures 160 mm long, 50 mm wide, and 38 mm thick. The weight is about 300 grams. It looks very stylish and professional with the dark gray and gold finish. On the front side, you can see an LED indicator which is to warn about an overload or audio peak. The construction is sturdy and rugged.

Technical Specs

Blue SparkBlue Yeti
- Transducer Type : Condenser, Pressure Gradient- Capsules : condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Patterns : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response : 20Hz – 20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Max SPL : 136 dB SPL (1k, THD 0.5%)- Max SPL : 120dB (THD: 0.5% 1kHz)

Polar Pattern
One of the biggest differences between Neumann TLM 102 vs AKG C414 is the polar pattern. Neumann TLM 102 only has a single polar pattern, which is cardioid. This polar pattern is suitable for most recording purposes, as it captures audio signals from a single direction while rejecting the rest.

However, AKG C414 offers a greater range of versatility and adaptability. It has nine selectable polar patterns for the best setting for every need. The polar patterns include cardioid, wide cardioid, hypercardioid, figure eight, and omnidirectional. So, you can choose the most suitable polar patterns for different vocals, instruments, and conditions.

Features
Neumann TLM 102 has a high maximum SPL handling by default. It can handle voices as loud as 144 dB, which is good enough for most singers and instruments except the very loud ones. In addition, it has a very low self noise level, which is only 12 dBA. It uses an XLR3F connector.

On the other hand, AKG C414 has a default maximum SPL handling of 140 dB. However, it is also equipped with a selectable pre-attenuation pad which can be set to -6dB, -12dB, or -18dB. So, you can have a maximum SPL handling of 158 dB with this mic, which is high enough for most loud singers and instruments.

In addition, AKG C414 also features a selectable bass-cut filter which attenuates the frequencies under 160 Hz, 80 Hz, or 40 Hz. This is useful for reducing wind and handling noise. It has a very low self noise level of just 6 dBA.

Sound Quality
Both of these two mics have excellent sound quality. They both have a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz.Neumann TLM 102 tends to be brighter due to the slight presence boost above 6 kHz. Meanwhile, AKG C414 is also somewhat bright; it has a soaring sound that is the typical of condenser microphones.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs AKG C414

- Large-diaphragm microphone with cardioid directional characteristic (pressure gradient transducer)
- Compact Neumann design
- Very high maximum sound pressure level (144 dB)
- Slight presence boost above 6 kHz helps vocals to shine in the mix
- Sonic character of the famous AKG C12 delivers astounding sound quality for lead vocals and solo instruments
- Nine selectable polar patterns for the perfect setting for every application
- Three attenuation levels (-6/-12/-18dB) for close-up recording or high-output sources of up to 158dB SPL
- Three switchable different bass-cut filters to reduce wind noise, stage vibration or proximity effect

Conclusion
In general, AKG C414 makes the better choice. It offers a great value for the money. It is a lot more versatile with the features and capabilities.

Rode K2 Vs Neumann U87 Comparison

In the following article, we will discuss the comparisons between Rode K2 vs Neumann U87. Both of them are condenser microphones with multiple polar patterns. However, Rode K2 is available at a much lower price point. Despite being more affordable, its features do look more attractive. On the other hand, though, Neumann U87 has been considered by many as one of the very best condenser models available for the money. Continue reading below to determine which one is better for you.

Rode K2 Vs Neumann U87

Design and Dimensions
Interestingly, Rode K2 and Neumann U87 are about the same size. Rode K2 measures 208 mm long, with a diameter of 55 mm. The weight is about 815 grams. The build quality is very good; it features a welded, heat-treated steel mesh head which is highly durable. Inside, there is an internal shock mount and one-inch capsule with gold-sputtered diaphragm. There is a dedicated power supply for the mic.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 measures 200 mm long and 56 mm wide. The weight is approximately 500 grams. It comes with a pressure-gradient transducer with a double-membrane capsule. The metallic casing and grille are solid and rugged.

Technical Specs

Rode K2Neumann U87
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Figure 8, Omnidirectional- Directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-810dB attenuation switch127dB
- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz- SPL handling response : 20Hz to 20kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Impedance rated : 200 ohms

Features
Both mics have three polar patterns: cardioid, figure-eight, and omnidirectional. They are both very versatile, as they can be adapted to suit different needs and conditions. By the way, take a look at our previous post about Neumann U67 vs U87!

Rode K2 comes with a dedicated power supply, so there is no need to worry about adjusting the phantom power. It already has a very high maximum SPL handling by default, which is 162 dB. With such high level, this mic can easily take care of even the loudest singers. In addition, the self noise level is impressively low at 10dBA.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 requires +48V phantom power. The maximum SPL handling is only 117 dB, but there is a -10dB pre-attenuation pad which you can activate to increase the limit to 127 dB. This is still lower than Rode K2’s maximum SPL handling. Meanwhile, the lowest self noise level is 12 dBA, which is on the cardioid polar pattern. Neumann U87 also features a switchable low-frequency roll off, which is handy for reducing mechanical handling noise and wind noise.

Sound Quality
Despite the price difference between Rode K2 vs Neumann U87, the performance of Rode K2 is very impressive. It has very low self noise, so the mic can capture the sound with great clarity. The produced output is accurate and detailed. The output character tends to be bright, which is quite common for condenser mics.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 has a balanced sound that is accurate and natural. It also offers very good clarity, as the self noise level is also very low. It is quite versatile, suitable for vocals and many instruments.

Rode K2 Vs Neumann U87

- Large 1" capsule with gold sputtered diaphragm and internal shock mounting
- Hand-selected and graded 6922 twin-triode valve
- High strength welded and heat-treated steel mesh head
- Arguably the best known and most widely used studio microphone in the world (for good reason), the easy-to-recognize U 87 is a classic!
- A distinctive design and mythical Neumann sound make this microphone a must-have for pro studios
- The U 87 is known for its one-of-a-kind frequency and transient response characteristics which deliver a smooth natural sound with a bunch of source material

Conclusion
If you are concerned about the value of the money, Rode K2 indeed makes a better choice. It is available at a much lower price point, while having very good features and sound quality. On the other hand, Neumann U87 indeed has very good quality, but the price is very expensive.

Neumann U67 Vs U87 Comparison

Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 come from the same family of condenser microphones. They may look quite similar, and they indeed share a number of similar features such as the switchable polar pattern, pre-attenuation pad, and high-pass filter. So, which one is better? Despite the similarities, there are a few distinctive features between Neumann U67 vs U87 that may make one of them more suitable for you than the other.

Neumann U67 Vs U87

The Similar Features
First of all, let’s see how these two condenser microphones are similar to each other. They each have three switchable polar patterns, which are cardioid, omnidirectional, and figure-eight. The cardioid polar pattern captures sound signals from the front while rejecting other signals from the sides and rear, so it is suitable for vocals. The omnidirectional polar pattern captures sound signals from all directions equally, and is great for some instruments and recording ambience.

Finally, the figure-eight polar pattern captures from the front and rear, and is handy for recording two voices at the same time, recording a singing instrumentalist, and recording in stereo. With these polar patterns, both Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 can be very versatile and useful in various recording situations. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs U87!

They each also have a 10dB pre-attenuation pad, which is handy for handling a loud singer or instrument, and a high-pass filter which can attenuate LF noise such as handling noise and wind. Again, these switchable features make these mics very versatile and handy for different recording needs and conditions.

Technical Specs

Neumann U67Neumann U87
- Microphone Type : Condenser- Microphone Type : Condenser
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8
- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHzResponse : 30Hz-18kHz
- Max SPL : 105dB (Cardioid), 110dB (Omni), 111dB (Figure-8)- Max SPL : 117dB (Cardioid) (127dB w/10dB Pre-attenuation)
- Output Impedance : 50 ohms- Output Impedance : 200 ohms
- Signal to Noise Ratio : 83dB (Cardioid), 78dB (Omni), 77dB (Figure-8)- Signal to Noise Ratio : 82dB (Cardioid); 79dB (Omni), 80dB (Figure-8)
- Self Noise : 11dB (Cardioid), 16dB (Omni), 17dB (Figure-8)- Self Noise : 12dB (Cardioid), 15dB (Omni), 14dB (Figure-8)

Frequency Response Range
The first difference between Neumann U67 vs U87 is the frequency response range. Neumann U67 has a shorter frequency response range of 40 Hz – 16 kHz. As the effect, it does not have much headroom, and it does not reach deep down for the bass. However, the sound quality is exceptional. It has a very natural sound. It works extremely well as a drum overhead, and is great for a simple drum set-up in a good room.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 comes with a longer frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. It can capture higher and lower notes. However, the sound tends to be bright. It is great for vocals, as it can help to boost the presence of the voice. It is suitable for singers with deep voices and rappers.

Maximum SPL Handling
The next difference between Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 is the maximum SPL handling. Neumann U67 has a lower maximum SPL handling, which is 116 dB. On the other hand, Neumann U87 has a slightly higher maximum SPL handling, which is 117 dB. With the pre-attenuation pad turned on, it increases to 127 dB. So, Neumann U87 is slightly better in handling loud voices.

Neumann U67 Vs U87

- The Neumann TLM 67 is a large-diaphragm condenser microphone in the classic Neumann style
- 3 selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-810dB attenuation switch127dB SPL handling 20Hz to 20kHz response Impedance rated at 200 ohms.

Conclusion
In the end, choosing between these two mics depends on your need. If you prefer a natural-sounding mic that is suitable for both vocals and instruments, Neumann U67 is the way to go. It is relatively more versatile. On the other hand, Neumann U87 is great if you need a bright mic for singers with deep voices or rappers.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs U87 Comparison

Are you confused in choosing between Neumann TLM 102 vs U87? In the article below, we will discuss the comparisons between these great mics. Neumann TLM 102 serves as an entry-level model for people who want to have a look at Neumann’s range of high-quality mics. It is much more affordable, yet the sound quality is great. On the other hand, Neumann U87 is much more expensive and is equipped with more features. Continue reading below to determine the best model for you!

Neumann TLM 102 Vs U87

Dimensions
Neumann TLM 102 is quite significantly lighter at 210 grams. It is also more compact, with a diameter of 52 mm and a length of 116 mm. Hence, Neumann TLM 102 can be a more portable mic that is easy to handle. It is available in two finishes, matte black and nickel. The bundle includes a stand mount which is quite useful and effective for eliminating mechanical noise. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs 103.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 is quite bigger and heavier. It measures 56 mm wide, 200 mm long. The weight is approximately 500 grams. The finish is nickel. Depending on the set that you purchase, it may come with a wooden, cardboard, or aluminum box, along with optional suspensions.

Techincal Specs

Neumann TLM 102Neumann U87
- Directional pattern : Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8
- Frequency range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz
- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kΩ : 11 mV/Pa- Max SPL : 117dB (Cardioid) (127dB w/10dB Preattenuation)
- Rated impedance : 50 Ω- Output Impedance : 200 ohms

Features
Neumann TLM 102 is a decent cardioid microphone. The polar pattern is cardioid, which means that it focuses on the sound from the front while rejecting the signals from the sides and rear. Neumann TLM 102 also boasts a very high maximum SPL, 144 dB, which enables the mic to handle very loud voices. It has a slight presence boost above 6 kHz.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 comes with more advanced features. It has a switchable polar pattern with three characteristics: cardioid, omni-directional, and figure-8. Hence, Neumann U87 is a more versatile mic that can adapt to different needs and conditions. In addition, it has a switchable 10 dB pre-attenuation pad which can increase the maximum SPL from 117 dB to 127 dB. It also has a switchable low-frequency roll-off which you can use to attenuate LF noise.

Performance
Neumann TLM 102 vs U87 have some different characteristics. In general, the sound of Neumann TLM 102 is more neutral despite the slight presence boost above 6 kHz. It makes the sound slightly brighter without a significant change to the overall color. It can help vocals to cut through the mix. Compared to Neumann U87, the sensitivity is lower. It is not very good in capturing fine audio details. Nevertheless, the self-noise level is low at 12 dB-A, which means that this mic has decent clarity.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 is much more sensitive. It can capture fine audio details very well, but it is also more prone to noise. It also tends to be brighter. The self-noise level is similar to Neumann TLM 102 when in the cardioid mode, and it is generally a quiet mic with good clarity as well.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs U87

- Large-diaphragm microphone with cardioid directional characteristic (pressure gradient transducer)
- Very high maximum sound pressure level (144 dB)
- Slight presence boost above 6 kHz helps vocals to shine in the mix
- Arguably the best known and most widely used studio microphone in the world (for good reason), the easy-to-recognize U 87 is a classic!
- A distinctive design and mythical Neumann sound make this microphone a must-have for pro studios
- The U 87 is known for its one-of-a-kind frequency and transient response characteristics which deliver a smooth natural sound with a bunch of source material

Conclusion
If you don’t need multiple polar patterns and bass roll-off, Neumann TLM 102 is more recommended. It makes a good value, as it is much more affordable. The sound is more neutral, but the sensitivity is lower. In addition, the maximum SPL is higher. But if you need a versatile mic with multiple polar patterns, bass roll-off, and high sensitivity, Neumann U87 can be your choice.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs 103 Comparison

Neumann’s models are generally accepted as high-quality microphones. In the following article, we will discuss the comparisons between Neumann TLM 102 vs 103, which are both among the more affordable models from the company. Neumann TLM 102 is available at a lower price point, and is praised for the natural audio character. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 is more expensive. It offers a lower self-noise level and top-end presence boost. See the details below to determine which mic is the best for you!

Neumann TLM 102 Vs 103

Design
Neumann TLM 102 is available in two finish options, which are matte black and nickel. It has the red Neumann logo embossed on the front side. It does look professional, and it feels rugged and durable. Compared to the sibling, Neumann TLM 102 is smaller and lighter. The diameter is 52 mm, and the weight is only 210 grams. (Read also : Rode NTK Vs Neumann TLM 102 Comparison)

On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 may look very similar at first – except for the size. This model is also available in two finish options, matte black and satin nickel, but it is bigger with a diameter of 60 mm. It is quite significantly heavier with a weight of 450 grams. The housing is also very rugged and durable.

Maximum SPL
When choosing between Neumann TLM 102 vs 103, note that they have different sound characteristics. Neumann TLM 102 has a more natural character which maintains the original qualities of the voice. In addition, it has a higher maximum sound pressure level (SPL) which is 144 dB. As the effect, this mic is great for loud and powerful singers. It is suitable for studio projects, broadcasters, and voiceover artists.

Neumann TLM 103 has a lower maximum SPL, which is 138 dB. So, it is not as good for taking care of loud, powerful singers.

Technical Specs

Rode VideoMic ProRode VideoMic Go
- Directional pattern : Cardioid- Directional pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz- Frequency range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kΩ : 11 mV/Pa- Sensitivity : 23 mV/Pa
- Rated impedance : 50 Ω- Rated impedance : 50 Ω

Sensitivity and Self-Noise
Neumann TLM 102 is a decent mic with good sensitivity and low self-noise. However, Neumann TLM 103 has even better sensitivity and lower self-noise. These qualities enable Neumann TLM 103 to capture more accurate audio details, and it can deliver better clarity.

Unlike Neumann TLM 102, Neumann TLM 103 has a presence boost on the top-end range between 6 – 15 kHz. As the effect, it tends to sound brighter. The presence boost can help the vocal to soar over the mix. It is especially very good for bass vocals and heavy male voices to increase the presence and audibility. It is also great for rap vocals.

However, Neumann TLM 103 is not recommended for bright voices, as the mic will make it sound too harsh. If you don’t want to get a bright-sounding mic, then this model is not for you.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs 103

- Compact Neumann design
- Very high maximum sound pressure level (144 dB)
- Slight presence boost above 6 kHz helps vocals to shine in the mix
- Large-diaphragm microphone with cardioid directional characteristic (pressure gradient transducer)
- Large diaphragm cardioid microphone
- Extremely low noise: 7 dB-A
- Straightforward handling for homerecording and professional studios
- Set includes microphone, shockmount and briefcase

Conclusion
Neumann TLM 102 and Neumann TLM 103 have different features and characters, and they are more suitable for different purposes. Neumann TLM 102 should be your choice if you prefer a more natural sound or if you need to avoid a bright-sounding mic. This model is great for loud, powerful singers due to the very high maximum SPL. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 is great for bass vocals, heavy male voices, and raps due to the presence boost. It has higher sensitivity and lower self-noise.

AKG C414 Vs Neumann TLM 103 Comparison

Microphone device is part of the sound system is pretty vital. Microphone consists of the type of use such as for vocals and also for percusion. There’s also the mic clip on which we can use for presentation purposes or used for the broadcaster. But this time the review discusses mic type a more versatile and luxurious. MY AKG C414 and Neumann TLM 103 two particular brands know superiorly but also with facilities and features that they provide. How RDA C414 against Neumann TLM 103, or vice versa?

AKG C414 Vs Neumann TLM 103

AKG C414
The list of features in AKG C414 are Sonic character of the famous AKG C12, Nine selectable polar patterns, Three attenuation levels (-6,-12,-18dB), Three switchable different bass-cut filters, and Overload warning with audio peak hold LED. The AKG C 414 XL II condenser microphone is the successor to the famous AKG C 414 B-TL II mic. The AKG C 414 XL II mic is a unique sonic signature of the highly sought showed by AKG. It enables lead vocals and solo instruments to be placed even in a dense mix. The sound produces unrivaled up-front that is well-known for distant miking applications like classic music recording or drum ambiance miking. The AKG C 414 also offers nine pickup patterns for you to choose the perfect setting for every application. If you want to see the live-sound applications and permanent installations, all controls can be disabled easily enabling trouble-free use. (See also : AKG C414 Vs Neumann U87 Comparison)

Technical Specs

AKG C414Neumann TLM 103
- Polar Pattern : Omni, Wide Cardioid, Cardioid, Hypercardioid, Figure-8- Directional pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz- Frequency range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Output Impedance : 200 ohms- Rated impedance : 50 ohms
- Equivalent noise level : 7 dB-A- Signal to Noise Ratio : 88dB (A weighted)

Neumann TLM 103
The Neumann TLM 103 is known as a universal cardioid mic. The words of cardioid refers to the directional pattern of the mic and the “heart-shaped” pattern that accepts sounds from the front and then rejects them at the back too. There are no switches at all in this mic TLM 103, so you can not switch it into omni mode as you want where it picks up from all sides. There is also no pad to lower the sensitivity of the mic. It is also a limitation on paper, although we know in reality it is not. The mic can handle a high SPL with a maximum of 138db and it does so with extremely low self noise and seems to resist overload. The Neumann TLM 103 is also known as a large diaphragm condenser mic which handle most recording situations one will come up against. It shines as a vocal mic with pleasing coloration in the high frequency realm. It has proximity effect is nearly perfect and absolutely gives you that extra bass you want without being overbearing. (Take a look : Neumann U87 Vs TLM 103 Comparison)

AKG C414 Vs Neumann TLM 103

- Nine selectable polar patterns for the perfect setting for every application
- Sonic character of the famous AKG C12 delivers astounding sound quality for lead vocals and solo instruments
- Three attenuation levels (-6/-12/-18dB) for close-up recording or high-output sources of up to 158dB SPL
- Delivery includes an SG 103 swivel mount and a wooden jeweler's box
- A standard name in high-end recording studios around the world, Neumann mics deliver the professional touch that's needed to capture high-quality audio
- The TLM 103 is fast becoming a standard for home recording and the music industry

Conclusion
Both AKG C414 and Neumann TLM 103 are amazing mics. The AKG 414 will probably give you more flexibility because of the variable polar patterns, pad, and other features. But the sound in Neumann with the Neumann that you try to tend to equate with more meat. While, the AKG 414 tends to sound more “airy” which can be good or bad thing depending on you all. In other words, both have their strengths and weaknesses. You may become the judge based on sound.

Neumann U87 Vs TLM 103 Comparison

Are you wondering if you should go with Neumann U87 or Neumann TLM 103? Neumann has been among the most favorable brands when it comes to true high-quality mics. Neumann U87 is particularly famous. It has been loved by lots of users since a long time ago. The performance and versatility are just nearly flawless. You can use it for almost any recording purpose and situation, and Neumann U87 will get the job done. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 has been regarded as a slightly more affordable alternative. Many people consider the model similar to Neumann U87, except that the model comes at a lower price point. So, should you go with Neumann U87 or Neumann TLM 103?

neumann-u87-vs-tlm-103

Polar Pattern
If we put these two mics next to each other, we all will agree that they indeed look quite differently from each other. Neumann U87 is a rather slender and relatively long mic, whereas Neumann TLM 103 is short but thick to the sides. However, they weigh almost similarly. Neumann U87 is 500 grams whereas Neumann TLM 103 is 450 grams. You can hardly notice the weight difference. Both feature metallic construction that aims for maximum durability and longevity. Neumann U87 and Neumann TLM 103 are likely to keep up for years even with heavy-duty usage.

Technical Specs

Neumann U87Neumann TLM 103
- Frequency range : 20 Hz ... 20 kHz- Large-diaphragm cardioid microphone
- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kohm : 20/28/22 mV/Pa1)- Transformerless circuitry
- Rated impedance : 200 ohms- Extremely low noise: 7 dB-A

However, Neumann U87 and Neumann TLM 103 do come with different polar patterns. Neumann TLM 103, much like most microphones for vocals and instruments, is cardioid. A cardioid polar pattern means that the mic captures sounds from the front side and rejects the left, right, and rear. On the other hand, Neumann U87 comes with three selectable polar patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-eight. For your information, the omnidirectional pattern picks up sounds equally from any direction, and the figure-eight pattern picks up sounds from the front and rear. Having multiple polar patterns ready means that you have the utmost versatility to handle any recording situation with ease. (Take a look : Neumann U47 Vs U87 Comparison)

Audio Quality
At first, Neumann U87 and Neumann TLM 103 can sound very similarly to each other. However, there are fundamental differences in the output characteristics. Neumann U87 comes with a transformer in the output circuitry, making it easy to connect to anything it is connected to. The design also adds a certain hair on the sound, which gives a unique life to the audio recording. Additionally, Neumann U87 has also been equipped with a low-cut filter and a pre-attenuation pad. These two features are very handy to take care of a multitude of inputs with different characteristics. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 does not have a transformer. As the effect, Neumann TLM 103 sounds cleaner and rather brighter than Neumann U87. The proximity effect that Neumann TLM 103 brings creates a huge bottom when used close to the audio source.

Neumann U87 Vs TLM 103

- 3 selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-810dB attenuation switch127dB SPL handling 20Hz to 20kHz response Impedance rated at 200 ohms.
- Large diaphragm cardioid microphone. Extremely low noise: 7 dB-A. Straightforward handling for homerecording and professional studios.

Conclusion
Basically, both Neumann U87 and Neumann TLM 103 are excellent products. They have each own virtues. However, Neumann U87 is much more versatile due to the multiple polar patterns, which has each own proximity effect, and additional low-cut filter and pre-attenuation pad. Therefore, we recommend you to choose Neumann U87!

Neumann U47 Vs U87 Comparison

Since its first release quite a long time ago, Neumann U87 has become the most popular mic model, and has remained so even until today. This is achieved not by some random chance, for sure. Neumann U87 indeed has superior performance and versatility that allow it to function perfectly in any recording situation. And, the audio output quality is arguably flawless. However, some people may have found Neumann U47 as well. Are you currently wondering if you should go with Neumann U47 or Neumann U87? Don’t worry! You can find the answer below!

neumann-u47-vs-u87

Design
In a glance, Neumann U47 and Neumann U87 may seem somewhat similar to each other. There are subtle differences in design; Neumann U47 is more rounded and tubular whereas Neumann U87 is more edgy, with the grille shape being rather rectangular. Even so, both mics feature metallic construction that is ultra-rugged and durable, ready to withstand and last through any heavy-duty usage.

Technical Specs

Neumann U47Neumann U87
- Frequency range : 40 Hz ... 16 kHz- Frequency range : 20 Hz ... 20 kHz
- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kohm : 8 mV/Pa- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kohm : 20/28/22 mV/Pa1)
- Rated impedance : 150 ohms- Rated impedance : 200 ohms

Both Neumann U47 and Neumann U87 are making use of the pressure gradient transducer as the operating principle. Even so, quite interestingly, Neumann U47 only features a single polar pattern, which is cardioid. A cardioid polar pattern captures sounds from the front while rejecting sounds coming from the sides and rear. This polar pattern is particularly useful if you want to focus the audio recording from a single source or direction, such as for musical purposes. On the other hand, Neumann U87 comes with three selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-eight. The omnidirectional pattern picks up sounds from any direction equally, whereas the figure-eight pattern captures sounds only from the front and rear. Having multiple polar patterns adds a great deal of versatility, allowing you to handle any condition with ease.

Read also : AKG C414 Vs Neumann U87 Comparison.

Performance
Furthermore, in general, Neumann U87 also comes with relatively better performance and output quality compared to Neumann U47. This is due to the fact that Neumann U87 has a considerably wider frequency response range and higher sensitivity level. Neumann U47 has a frequency response range of 40 Hz – 16 kHz, and 8 mV/Pa sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 k-ohm load. On the other hand, Neumann U87 has a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. Obviously, the extended reach to the lower and higher frequencies improves the overall quality. The bass, midrange, and treble are more properly staged. Bass is especially full and solid without muddling vocals and instruments. Treble has an extra airiness that adds crisp and clarity to mids and highs. Neumann U87 is also able to capture more subtle details, thanks to the significantly higher sensitivity levels. Additionally, the noise level of Neumann U87 is also quite lower, which means that you can capture sounds with better clarity and cleanliness.

Perhaps one advantage of Neumann U47 is that it has a very high maximum SPL handling. It is able to take in up to 147 dB input by using the pre-attenuation pad. This is handy when you need to handle loud volume levels.

Neumann U47 Vs U87

- AudioFrequency response: 40Hz - 16kHzMax SPL: 137dBPattern and typeCapsule: CondenserPattern: CardioidType: MountedApplications: StudioPhantom power required: YesSize and weightL x W x (D): 10.2" x 4.8" x 4.1"Weight: 3.1 lb.
- 3 selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-810dB attenuation switch127dB SPL handling 20Hz to 20kHz response Impedance rated at 200 ohms.

Conclusion
As the conclusion, we recommend you to stick with Neumann U87. The audio quality is much better than Neumann U47. In addition, it is also more versatile, thanks to the multiple polar patterns.

Rode NTK Vs Neumann TLM 102 Comparison

If you are looking for a truly top-notch condenser microphone that you can rely on for crystal-clear quality vocal recording, you make no mistake by considering to get either Rode NTK or Neumann TLM 102. Both of them are available in a similar price range, though Neumann TLM 102 is usually a little bit pricier than Rode NTK. Each of the two products has received quite a lot of positive reviews from the users, praised for the superior performance and output quality. So, now, between Rode NTK and Neumann TLM 102, which is the one that you should choose?

rode-ntk-vs-neumann-tlm-102

Design
Both Rode NTK and Neumann TLM 102 have a cardioid polar pattern. They pick up sounds the best from the front and slightly from the sides due to the rather wide pick-up angle, while attenuating the rear. One thing that can be worth a note, even though Rode NTK and Neumann TLM 102 are both condenser microphones, the two feature slightly different internal designs. Whereas Neumann TLM 102 is a condenser microphone with a pressure gradient transducer, Rode NTK is a tube condenser microphone. Having an internal tube impedance converter system, Rode NTK becomes quite bulkier and heavier than Neumann TLM 102. Rode NTK, measuring 55 mm x 55 mm x 208 mm, is rather long. With a mass of 760 grams, the mic is also quite heavy. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 102 is relatively more compact and lightweight, with a diameter of 52 mm and length of 116 mm. The mass is barely 210 grams. When it comes to handling and ease of placement, Neumann TLM 102 has the better edge here than Rode NTK.

Technical Specs

Rode NTKNeumann TLM 102
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency range: 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Sensitivity: -38.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kΩ 11 mV/Pa
- Output Impedance 200Ω- Rated impedance 50 Ω - Rated load impedance 1 kΩ
- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) 12dB-A- Equivalent noise level, A-weighted 12 dB-A
- Maximum SPL 158dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)- Maximum SPL for THD 0.5% 144 dB
- Maximum Output Level 29.0mV- Maximum output voltage 13 dBu
- Weight 760.00gm- Weight Approx. 210 g
- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient- Acoustical operating principle Pressure gradient transducer

Output Quality
As we have mentioned before, Rode NTK is a tube condenser mic, while Neumann TLM 102 is a condenser mic with a pressure gradient transducer. For sure, they deliver different output characteristics.

Rode NTK, like most other tube condenser mics, breathes some warmth into the audio reproduction. This is great if you want to somewhat smoothen the vocal. The mic has a very low noise level and a wide dynamic range. It can capture lows, mids, and highs very well, with satisfying accuracy and cleanliness.

On the other hand, Neumann TLM 102 sounds more natural. It reproduces the original tones more accurately. The audio reproduction is bright, crisp, and clear. When you want to have the utmost sonic accuracy and retain the original color of the vocal, Neumann TLM 102 is the weapon to choose. Neumann TLM 102 also has a similarly very low noise level, only the maximum SPL that is slightly lower than Rode NTK’s.

Rode NTK Vs Neumann TLM 102

- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Class A valve circuitry
- Wide dynamic range
- Hand-selected and graded 6922 twin-triode valve
- Large-diaphragm microphone with cardioid directional characteristic (pressure gradient transducer)
- Compact Neumann design
- Very high maximum sound pressure level (144 dB)
- Slight presence boost above 6 kHz helps vocals to shine in the mix

Conclusion
In general, Neumann TLM 102 makes the best way to go. The natural output quality makes it flexible and versatile for different vocal types. If you want to have warmer sounds, you can simply pair it with a tube preamp. On the other hand, Rode NTK is also great, and is a viable choice if you want to have a tube condenser mic instead.

  • 1
  • 2