Browse Category: Rode

Rode NTG2 Vs VideoMic Pro Comparison

Looking for a microphone to be used as a professional audio recording my not an easy task. You can choose from so many different manufacturer in the market and in a wide range of price that also followed by their own quality. In today Rode NTG2 vs VideoMic Pro article, we are going to compare these two brothers to give you more information regarding what you can expect from them and how they are set apart from each other. If one/two of them took your interest, go check our article below.

In this article, we are going to give you information about:
– What are Rode NTG2 and VideoMic Pro
– What Rode NTG2 and VideoMic Pro can offer to you
– Rode NTG2 vs VideoMic Pro

About Rode NTG2
The Rode NTG2 is said to be one of the company’s entry-level 11” short range shotgun microphone that not only able to give you a clear accurate sound but also able to provide a good amount of rejection. As what you can expect from Rode, this microphone is built packed with quality and also one of the most popular model due to its remarkable performance as well as the wallet-friendly price. When it was first available, the mic can be considered as one that has the narrowest pickup pattern among other short shotgun.

Rode NTG2 Design
When talking about the built, Rode NTG2 is clearly built to be durable. It has a long 10-year warranty which is nice thing to have for an entry model. This one is a shotgun mic with a supercardioid polar pattern, which makes it a strongly directional in the front and has diminished responds to the sounds from the side and rear. It comes with lightweight metal housing that is ideal for camera mounting. However, there are some annoyance, such as the difficulty to access the roll of switch.

Rode NTG2 Abilities
Rode NTG2 comes with built-in low-cut/high pass filter that has a fixed cutoff frequency of 80Hz and is very useful to handle low frequency background rumble when you record in typical urban environment. This feature also let the shotgun to be mounted directly into something like HDSLR and operated with 2 AA batteries since not many out there have the same filtering.

As for the sound quality, Rode NTG2 has e very smooth and almost ideal frequency pattern for an entry-level mic, which means it able to represent the sound with accuracy and minimum coloration. The sound it able to reproduce is relatively rich and sensitive enough to capture the slightest detail in its range. If you are taking the price into consideration, the mic is more than enough for budget filming, but you will still need more tools and skills for certain situations.

The maximum SPL for this microphone is quite high, which makes it applicable for some very loud environments, such as those where you need to shout in order to be heardat 131 dB @ 1% THD. However, you may still need to add a bit gain to the recording because this mic is soft voices even though it has no impact on the quality. The noise figures are also average but it should be enough for low-entry level microphone and the sibilance is still kept to minimum. Read also: Sennheiser e935 Review here.

Technical Specs

Rode NTG2VideoMic Pro
-Power Req.: 48V Phantom Power or 1.5 AA battery- Rycote Lyre shock mounting onboard
-Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted): 18dB-A- Ultra lightweight (85g/3oz)
- Sensitivity: -36.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (15.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- 9V battery powered - over 70 hours use (alkaline)
- Maximum Output Level: 6.9mV- Integrated shock mounting & foam windscreen
- Maximum SPL: 131dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)- 3.5mm stereo mini-jack output (dual mono)
- Output Impedance: 250Ω- Two step High Pass Filter (flat, 80Hz)
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz- Three position level control (-10dB, 0, +20dB)
- Polar Pattern: Supercardioid- Camera shoe mount with 3/8” thread for easy boompole mounting

About VideoMic Pro
VideoMic Pro is also one of the most popular shotgun microphone from Rode. This unit is built to follow the predecessor that has been a long favorite of shooters who are seeking for an inexpensive and lightweight shotgun. Compared to the original model, the Pro is obviously smaller and has more accessible features. If you are in need of a microphone that can give a better quality audio record from your digital SLRs, you might want to take look at this one.

VideoMic Pro Design
As it has been mentioned earlier, VideoMic Pro is small and lightweight with just 15 cm long and 86 grams, so it won’t overwhelm even the smallest video-enabled SLRs. It is powered by a single 9-volt battery located just under the microphone itself and the company claims that this single battery will be able to give you enough juice for 70 hours of recording time. The connector is 3.5mm jack and you may get the free windshield which they called “Deadcat” when you redeem the extended warranty to give additional coverage against wind noise.

VideoMic Pro Abilities
VideoMic Pro is an active supercardioid condenser microphone that means the axis sound rejection is superb. Similar to the NTG2 model we have talked above, this one also has high pass filter that can be activated through a switch located at the back of the microphone to allow it internally filter out handling noise and low noise when taking video in crowded typical urban environments. The biggest improvement it has over the predecessor is the built in attenuation and boost functionality to operate under different kinds of situations as well as equipment.

VideoMic Pro 10 dB PAD and 0 dB settings will be great for loud sources or environments where the sound clarity is not an issue and even though it is similar to the older model that doesn’t contain any settings, the microphone will show its ability when the level is boosted +20 dB since it will give you a clear and clean boost for poor quality pre-amp inputs commonly found on Camcorders and DSLRs. This will allow you to get lower noise floor and cleaner audio signal.

Comparison
Now, let’s compare Rode NTG2 with VideoMic Pro. From weight, VideoMic Pro is slightly lighter compare to NTG2. From easy mounting, VMP is easier with the 3.5mm jack while NTG2 will need an XLR adapter for quick plugging. From the sound, NTG2 is better with its low noise circuitry to limits handling noise wonderfully as well as better sound fidelity and able to focus on subject more effectively with less overall hiss compared to VMP.

Rode NTG2 Vs VideoMic Pro

- Broadcast sound quality
- Low noise circuitry
- 48V phantom power or 1.5V AA battery
- Two step high-pass filter - flat or 80 Hz
- Rugged metal construction
- Rycote Lyre shock mounting onboard
- All new capsule with lower noise and higher sensitivity
- Broadcast recording quality condenser microphone
- Compact form factor (150mm/6" length)
- Ultra lightweight (85g/3oz)

Conclusion
All in all, the decision is all yours to make. In our opinion, you can’t go wrong with any of these microphone. The NTG2 is clearly better than VideoMic Pro since it has better build and sound quality even though you will need to purchase some accessories later. The VideoMic Pro is of course more affordable, still able to performs great and meshes with DSLR so well, but taking all the plus side in the other, we will recommend you NTG2 over VMP.

Rode K2 Vs Neumann U87 Comparison

In the following article, we will discuss the comparisons between Rode K2 vs Neumann U87. Both of them are condenser microphones with multiple polar patterns. However, Rode K2 is available at a much lower price point. Despite being more affordable, its features do look more attractive. On the other hand, though, Neumann U87 has been considered by many as one of the very best condenser models available for the money. Continue reading below to determine which one is better for you.

Rode K2 Vs Neumann U87

Design and Dimensions
Interestingly, Rode K2 and Neumann U87 are about the same size. Rode K2 measures 208 mm long, with a diameter of 55 mm. The weight is about 815 grams. The build quality is very good; it features a welded, heat-treated steel mesh head which is highly durable. Inside, there is an internal shock mount and one-inch capsule with gold-sputtered diaphragm. There is a dedicated power supply for the mic.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 measures 200 mm long and 56 mm wide. The weight is approximately 500 grams. It comes with a pressure-gradient transducer with a double-membrane capsule. The metallic casing and grille are solid and rugged.

Technical Specs

Rode K2Neumann U87
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Figure 8, Omnidirectional- Directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-810dB attenuation switch127dB
- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz- SPL handling response : 20Hz to 20kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Impedance rated : 200 ohms

Features
Both mics have three polar patterns: cardioid, figure-eight, and omnidirectional. They are both very versatile, as they can be adapted to suit different needs and conditions. By the way, take a look at our previous post about Neumann U67 vs U87!

Rode K2 comes with a dedicated power supply, so there is no need to worry about adjusting the phantom power. It already has a very high maximum SPL handling by default, which is 162 dB. With such high level, this mic can easily take care of even the loudest singers. In addition, the self noise level is impressively low at 10dBA.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 requires +48V phantom power. The maximum SPL handling is only 117 dB, but there is a -10dB pre-attenuation pad which you can activate to increase the limit to 127 dB. This is still lower than Rode K2’s maximum SPL handling. Meanwhile, the lowest self noise level is 12 dBA, which is on the cardioid polar pattern. Neumann U87 also features a switchable low-frequency roll off, which is handy for reducing mechanical handling noise and wind noise.

Sound Quality
Despite the price difference between Rode K2 vs Neumann U87, the performance of Rode K2 is very impressive. It has very low self noise, so the mic can capture the sound with great clarity. The produced output is accurate and detailed. The output character tends to be bright, which is quite common for condenser mics.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 has a balanced sound that is accurate and natural. It also offers very good clarity, as the self noise level is also very low. It is quite versatile, suitable for vocals and many instruments.

Rode K2 Vs Neumann U87

- Large 1" capsule with gold sputtered diaphragm and internal shock mounting
- Hand-selected and graded 6922 twin-triode valve
- High strength welded and heat-treated steel mesh head
- Arguably the best known and most widely used studio microphone in the world (for good reason), the easy-to-recognize U 87 is a classic!
- A distinctive design and mythical Neumann sound make this microphone a must-have for pro studios
- The U 87 is known for its one-of-a-kind frequency and transient response characteristics which deliver a smooth natural sound with a bunch of source material

Conclusion
If you are concerned about the value of the money, Rode K2 indeed makes a better choice. It is available at a much lower price point, while having very good features and sound quality. On the other hand, Neumann U87 indeed has very good quality, but the price is very expensive.

Rode M5 Vs AKG P170 Comparison

Rode M5 and AKG P170 are two models of pencil microphones often deployed for choirs and instruments. They are available in a similar price range, and they do share a number of similarities such as the frequency response range, polar pattern, and self noise level. Still, there are a few differences that set Rode M5 vs AKG P170 apart. Continue reading below to see whether Rode M5 or AKG P170 suits you!

Rode M5 Vs AKG P170

Size and Weight
Rode M5 is smaller and lighter than AKG P170. Rode M5 measures 20 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length. The weight is approximately 80 grams. In most cases, the mic is practical and easy to handle. You can get a pair of Rode M5 in a bundle that also includes the mic clips and pop filters. See our previous post about Rode M5 vs NT5 here!

On the other hand, AKG P170 is a little bit bigger and heavier. It has a diameter of 22 mm, a length of 160 mm, and a weight of about 130 grams. The mic is sold in a package that also includes a stand adapter. Both Rode M5 and AKG P170 have all-metal bodies for the best ruggedness and durability.

Technical Specs

Rode M5AKG P170
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz
- Output Impedance : 200 ohm- Output Impedance : 200 ohms
- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient- Microphone Type : Condenser
- Capsule : 0.50"- Mono/Stereo : Mono

Features
Rode M5 is a little more versatile in term of powering because it can work with either +24V or +48V phantom power. On the other hand, AKG P170can only work with +48V phantom power with ±4V tolerance.

Both mics have the cardioid polar pattern. A mic with a cardioid polar pattern captures sound signals from the front direction while rejecting signals from the sides and rear. Because of this, cardioid mics are suitable for musical recordings. They are more resistant to environmental noise.

Rode M5 has a good maximum SPL handling of 140 dB. This mic is good enough for handling most instruments and vocals except the very loud ones.

On the other hand, although AKG P170 only has a maximum SPL handling of 135 dB, it comes with a –20dB switchable pre-attenuation pad which enables it to handle sounds as loud as 155 dB. Hence, it is a good choice when you need to handle a very loud vocal or instrument.

Sound Quality
Rode M5 vs AKG P170 have similar sound quality, which is not entirely surprising due to the fact that they have similar frequency response range and self noise level. Each of them has a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz and a self noise level of 19 dBA. They are able to capture lows, mids, and highs with decent accuracy and definition. They have pretty good clarity.

Rode M5 does have a slightly higher sensitivity, which makes it able to capture more audio details. However, this also means that it is more prone to noise – the pop filters can be quite handy. On the other hand, AKG P170 has a slightly lower sensitivity, but the performance is still good.

Rode M5 Vs AKG P170

- Power Options: +48V phantom power, +24V phantom power
- Warranty: 1 year with free extension to 10 years following registration
- Rugged all-metal body and robust design withstands tough day-to-day use
- Switchable attenuation pad for high SPL applications up to 155 dB SPL

Conclusion
Between the two mics, AKG P170 is more recommended. The pre-attenuation pad makes the mic more versatile. You can use it for handling a wide variety of instruments, including the louder ones.

Rode Videomicr Vs Videomic Go Comparison

Are you looking for a decent on-camera microphone which you can use for recording high-quality audio in your video projects? Rode has the Videomic line, which features several different models on specific price points. Rode Videomicro and Rode Videomic Go are relatively affordable models; the Videomicro is a little bit more cheaper than the Videomic Go. So, which one is better for the money? See the comparisons between Rode Videomicr vs Videomic Go below.

Rode Videomicr Vs Videomic Go

Dimensions
The first thing that you need to consider when choosing between Rode Videomicro and Rode Videomic Go is the dimensions. If you prefer a simple, compact, and lightweight microphone to sit on top of your camera, Rode Videomicro makes a better choice. It measures only 21 mm wide, 21 mm tall, and 80 mm long. The weight is only about 42 grams. Thus, it won’t get in the way of your work.

On the other hand, Rode Videomic Go is slightly bigger and heavier. It measures 79 mm tall, 73 mm wide, and 167 mm long. It has an integrated cold-shoe mount. The weight is about 73 grams. It is definitely still very usable, but not as practical as the sibling here. See also our previous post about Rode VideoMic Pro vs Go!

Durability
Rode Videomicro has an all-metal housing, whereas Rode Videomic Go comes with a reinforced ABS construction. So, the Videomicro is relatively more rugged and durable. It can withstand impacts and heavy abuse better.

Technical Specs

Rode VideomicrRode Videomic Go
- Acoustic Principle : Pressure Gradient- Acoustic Principle : Line Gradient
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Supercardioid
- Frequency Range : 100Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Range : 100Hz - 16kHz
- Maximum SPL : 140dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)- Maximum SPL : 120dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)
- Sensitivity : -33.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (22.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- Sensitivity : -35.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (17.80mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz
- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) : 20dB-A- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) : 34dB-A

Frequency Response and Sensitivity
Next, let’s have a look at the frequency response and sensitivity of Rode Videomicr vs Videomic Go. Interestingly, Rode Videomico actually has a wider frequency response range and better sensitivity. The frequency response range goes from 100 Hz to 20 kHz. The higher reach to the treble frequencies allow for more headroom, and the higher sensitivity allows the mic to capture better audio details.

On the other hand, the frequency response range of Rode Videomic Go only goes from 100 Hz to 16 kHz. The sensitivity is slightly lower. As the effect, it does not capture high-frequency sound signals very well.

Noise and SPL Handling
Finally, it is important to point out that Rode Videomicro has a higher maximum SPL handling and lower self noise level than Rode Videomic Go. The Videomicro can handle sounds as loud as 140 dB, which is impressive for such a compact mic. In addition, the self noise level is only 20 dBA, which is quite low. The users are happy with the quietness. This mic is very versatile and reliable for many conditions.

Rode Videomic Go has a maximum SPL handling of 120 dB, and the self noise level is 34 dBA. The noise is particularly annoying. It is pretty noisy, and it may be quite tricky and difficult to get good clarity. Using a denoiser is a great help, but not having that noise in the first place is much more convenient.

Rode Videomicr Vs Videomic Go

- Compact size and lightweight - only 80mm (3’) long and 42gm (1.5oz)
- No battery required (powered by camera plug-in power - min 3V)
- Rycote Lyre shock mount included
- Deluxe furry windshield included
- Designed and manufactured in Australia
- Mounting to camera
- High quality directional microphone
- No battery required
- Rode's lightest mic at only 73g
- Rugged reinforced ABS construction
- Windshield included
- Integrated cold-shoe mount with 3/8” thread

Conclusion
All in all, Rode Videomicro is definitely the better choice. It is more compact and more lightweight, with better performance. It has a wider frequency response range with lower noise, and it can handle loud voices very well.

Rode Procaster Vs RE320 Comparison

In the following article, we have the comparisons between two popular broadcast microphones, which are Rode Procaster and Electro-Voice RE320. These two models are both glowing with positive reviews from their respective users. Both mics offer very good broadcast-quality sound suitable for podcasts, interviews, talk shows, and the likes. So, between Rode Procaster vs RE320, which one is the better mic? There are several differences that you can consider to choose the right mic.

Rode Procaster Vs RE320

Design and Dimensions
Rode Procaster is slightly bigger and quite heavier than RE320. It has a diameter of 53 mm and a length of 214 mm. The weight is about 745 grams. It comes in a rugged, durable metal housing with an XLR output connector. This mic is designed with broadcasting and podcasting purposes in mind, so it comes with an internal pop filter and shock mounting for the capsule to reduce plosives and low-frequency handling noise.

RE320 is slimmer and lighter. The diameter is about 49.2 mm, while the length is 216.7 mm. The weight is approximately 681 grams. Of course, it also comes in a durable metal housing with the three-pin XLR connector. This mic features an integrated humbucking coil and internal pop filters to deliver a virtually noiseless performance in any condition.

Technical Specs

Rode ProcasterRE320
- Acoustic Principle : Dynamic- Microphone Type : Dynamic
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency Range : 75Hz - 18kHz- Frequency Response : 30Hz-18kHz
- Output Impedance : 320Ω- Output Impedance : 150 ohms

Polar Pattern
The next difference of Rode Procaster vs RE320 is the polar pattern. Rode Procaster comes with a standard cardioid polar pattern, which is great for capturing sound signals from a single direction. The cardioid polar pattern focuses on capturing signals from the front while rejecting the ones from the sides and rear. In general, Rode Procaster does a good job in attenuating environmental noise.

RE320 is actually also a cardioid mic, which means that it also captures sound signals from the front while rejecting the ones coming from the sides and rear. However, RE320 comes with the Variable-D pattern control technology, which minimizes tonal shifts caused by positional factors. As a result, the sound can be more consistent as you address the mic from slightly different angles. This is great for users who often move when talking or singing.

Performance
Rode Procaster is pretty great for broadcasting and podcasting, but it is not really versatile for other purposes. The frequency response range only goes from 75 Hz to 18 kHz. It does not capture enough bass for vocals and musical instruments. The sound will be flat without much of a depth.

On the other hand, RE320 can be versatile when needed. It has a selection switch to choose from the two response curves. The generic curve goes from 45 Hz – 18 kHz, which is great for human voices. However, if you need more bass, you can activate the kickcurve mode which goes from 30 Hz – 18 kHz. The extended reach in the lower frequency area allows for better bass and depth.

Rode Procaster Vs RE320

- Broadcast quality sound, high output dynamic capsule
- Balanced, low impedance output, internal shock mounting of capsule for low handling noise
- Internal pop-filter to reduce plosives
- Variable-D pattern control minimizes positional and off-axis tonal shifts
- Integrated humbucking coil and integral pop filters provide virtually noiseless performance
- Unique dual-voicing switch selects from two response curves

Conclusion
All in all, between these two models, we recommend you to choose RE320. This is a more versatile mic with better sound quality. It has the Variable-D pattern control to reduce tonal shifts, and the wider frequency response range allows for deeper, better bass.

Rode M5 Vs NT5 Comparison

Rode M5 and Rode NT5 are two pairs of condenser microphones often used for the stereo recording of live performances, choirs, as well as studio projects. Rode M5 is available at a significantly lower price point, and yet it is glowing with lots of positive reviews. It is praised for the excellent sound accuracy and detail. However, Rode NT5 does come with several advantages, such as the nickel-plated body, lower self-noise, lower impedance, and higher maximum SPL. Continue reading below for more details on Rode M5 vs NT5!

Rode M5 Vs NT5

Design
Rode M5 is a pair of stick condenser microphones designed for stereo recording. The mics are identical. Each has an all-metal housing with a ceramic matte-black coating. The housing is rugged and durable. Compared to the more expensive sibling, Rode M5 is shorter and lighter. Each mic measures 3.94 inches long and weighs approximately 3.00 oz.

Rode NT5 certainly looks more elegant and luxurious. This matched pair of condenser microphones features a satin-finish nickel-plates housing. The nickel plating enhances the durability. Nevertheless, the mics are longer and a little heavier. Each mic measures 4.65 inches long and weighs approximately 3.56 oz.

Technical Specs

Rode M5Rode NT5
- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient- Acoustic Principle : Pressure Gradient
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Output Impedance : 100Ω
- Power Options: +48V phantom power, +24V phantom power- Sensitivity : -38.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (12.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Features
Rode M5’s mics are cardioid. The heads are not replaceable, so you can only have the cardioid polar pattern. This is generally not a problem, but some projects may require omnidirectional heads for better results. For example, if you want to record the sound of a grand piano, cardioid heads may lose the bottom end, whereas omnidirectional heads can capture the sweet bass resonance.

Rode NT5’s mics also have cardioid heads. However, these heads are replaceable. You can purchase the omnidirectional heads for Rode NT55 and use them on Rode NT5. They work well. So, Rode NT5 can be more versatile, as you can use it with cardioid heads or omnidirectional heads for different projects and conditions.

Both Rode M5 and Rode NT5 come with their respective stand mounts and wind shields. Each product is protected by a 1-year warranty, but you can register your purchase to get a 10-year warranty.

Performance
So, how does the performance of Rode M5 vs Rode NT5 compare? Well, for the money, Rode M5 is already quite impressive. It is affordable, and yet it can deliver good sound quality. The sound is accurate and quite detailed. However, it is indeed on a lower level than Rode NT5. It has a higher self-noise level, and the noise may be annoying when you need to capture fine audio details.

Rode NT5 has noticeably better sound quality. It captures and reproduces fuller, more accurate bass. The mids and highs are more defined and detailed. Rode NT5 also has better clarity, thanks to the lower self-noise level. In addition, it has a higher maximum SPL, which means that it can reliably handle loud voices. Rode NT5 is great for recording soft ambient sounds as well as loud performances.

Rode M5 Vs NT5

- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient
- Polar Pattern: Carded
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Warranty: 1 year with free extension to 10 years following registration
- Externally biased condenser
- Gold sputtered 1/2 inch capsule
- Heavy duty satin nickel plated body
- Surface mount circuitry

Conclusion
If you are on a tight budget, Rode M5 makes a good solution. This model is more affordable, yet the performance is quite impressive. However, you should choose Rode NT5 if you can afford it. Rode NT5 has replaceable heads, and the sound quality is much better.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Go Comparison

So, you want to buy a shotgun mic in order to record videos with better audio quality. There are many people who would recommend Rode VideoMic models. After all, these are indeed very good entry-level shotgun mics suitable for DSLR cameras. However, there are several different models in the product line, designed for different needs and purposes. Two of the most popular options are Rode VideoMic Pro and Rode VideoMic Go. Yet, there is a considerable price gap between Rode VideoMic Pro vs Go. So, what is the difference between these shotgun mics of the same line?

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Go

Design
If you put the two mics side by side, you can see that Rode VideoMic Pro is indeed bigger. It actually measures 100 mm tall, 170 mm deep, and 75 mm wide. The weight is approximately 85 grams. Although it is bigger than the Go model, it is still considered compact, very lightweight, and portable. It is equipped with the Rycote Lyre shock mount, which is very effective for reducing handling noise. The cable is straight.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Go is the lightest mic in the line at just 73 grams. It is highly portable, as it measures barely 79 mm tall, 167 mm deep, and 73 wide. It is equipped with a somewhat similar shock mount which is quite effective for reducing handling noise. The audio cable is coiled. Don’t forget to check our previous post about Rode VideoMic Pro vs Takstar SGC 598 if you are looking for a budget-friendly mic.

Technical Specs

Rode VideoMic ProRode VideoMic Go
- Frequency Range : 40Hz - 20kHz (selected HPF @80)- Frequency Range : 100Hz - 16kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Maximum SPL : 120dBSPL
- Sensitivity : -32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- Sensitivity : -35.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (17.80mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Features
Rode VideoMic Pro comes with more additional features than the Go model. This mic is quite versatile and adjustable. It has a selectable high pass filter at 80 Hz which you can activate to reduce low-frequency noise. There is also a three-position level control which is adjustable to -10dB, 0, and +20dB. So, you can reduce or increase the sensitivity as needed. However, note that this mic requires a 9V battery to operate.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Go has neither the high pass filter nor the level control. The special feature is that it does not need any battery to operate. The power is supplied by the camera. It is convenient in a sense that you don’t need to worry about battery replacement.

Performance
In terms of performance, Rode VideoMic Pro is much better. It has a wider frequency response range of 40 Hz – 20 kHz, and the maximum SPL handling is also higher. Its self-noise level is very low at 14 dBA. This mic is able to capture sound with excellent accuracy and clarity. It is suitable for interviews, music, and film projects.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Go has a much narrower frequency response range of 100 Hz – 16 kHz. The self-noise level is considerably higher at 34 dBA. This model may have some noise issue, so it is only suitable for purposes like interviews and documentary reports.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Go

- Broadcast recording quality condenser microphone
- Compact design (only 150mm/6" length)
- Ultra lightweight (only 85g/3oz)
- 9V battery powered, with up to 70 hours battery life (alkaline)
- Rode USA Warranty - Rycote Mini Windjammer for Rode Videomic Go Microphone
- Adorama Valuable Bundle. Kit Includes
- Rode VideoMic GO Lightweight On-Camera Microphone
- Rycote Mini Windjammer for Rode Videomic Go Microphone, Rycote 1 Year Limited USA Warranty

Conclusion
Between these two models, Rode VideoMic Pro is indeed more recommended. It is more versatile, thanks to the selectable high pass filter and level control, and the sound quality is much better. But, if you really want to save some bucks, Rode VideoMic Go makes a viable alternative for interviews and documentary reports.

MXL 770 Vs Rode NT1A Comparison

Confused in choosing between MXL 770 vs Rode NT1A? Both of these two options are condenser mics that are quite popular on the market. These condenser mics are loved because of their natural sound and nice presence boost, both of which help to allow vocals to cut through the mix. So, which is the best condenser model that you better choose? Make sure that you read the comparisons below to make the right choice.

MXL 770 Vs Rode NT1A

Design
MXL 770 may have a better edge in terms of design due to the classy, professional look. The black metal grille pairs nicely with the black housing, and the golden font and golden line that circle the housing add a nice elegant touch. This model is slightly shorter and thicker. It is also a little bit heavier. The bundle includes a shock mount which is quite useful for reducing mechanical vibrations.

On the other hand, Rode NT1A has this long, slender shape that is colored in a silver hue with a slight creamish tint – see our previous post about Audio Technica AT2035 vs Rode NT1A. Well, the metallic construction looks professional, but it doesn’t look as classy as MXL 770. Nevertheless, the bundle includes more accessories, such as the shock mount and the wind filter. These accessories are very usable.

Technical Specs

MXL 770Rode NT1A
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency Range: 30Hz-20kHz- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Sensitivity: 15mV/Pa- Sensitivity : -31.9dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms- Output Impedance : 100Ω

Features
MXL 770 is equipped with a selectable -10dB pre-attenuation pad and an optional high pass filter at 150 Hz. The pre-attenuation pad is very handy. You can use this feature when recording a particularly loud singer. On the other hand, the high pass filter won’t be used as frequently because it tends to eliminate the natural low-end sound of the mic. This mic requires +48V phantom power.

Rode NT1A does not have any pre-attenuation pad or high pass filter, but the included shock mount and wind filter are good enough for reducing mechanical vibrations and low-frequency wind/breath noise. This mic is compatible with both +24V and +48V phantom power.

Performance
So, how do the performance qualities of MXL 770 vs Rode NT1A mics compare? In general, Rode NT1A is indeed better, even though MXL 770 is not bad either.

MXL 770 tends to be very raw-sounding. It captures the vocal nicely. It has good accuracy and natural low-end, so it is especially great for raps. However, it cannot be equalized very much.

On the other hand, Rode NT1A boasts an ultra-low noise level of only 5dBA. It also has a wider frequency response range, and the neutral response means that it doesn’t add much color to the recording. As a result, it can deliver more accurate sounds with impressive cleanliness and clarity. The output can be equalized more extensively. Although it may be too bright for extremely high-pitched and bassy singers, you can adjust the EQ to make it sound better.

MXL 770 Vs Rode NT1A

- Multipurpose small-diaphragm microphone
- Warm sound with extra clarity at the top end
- FET preamp with balanced, transformerless output
- Excellent for vocals, acoustic guitars, pianos, strings and voice-work
- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Cardioid polar pattern
- Self Noise of only 5 dB (A)
- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry

Conclusion
Between these two models, Rode NT1A is the winner. It has better sound quality and versatility. It is more accurate and balanced. The ultra-low noise level is impressive. The neutral response allows you to adjust the EQ more freely.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Takstar SGC 598 Comparison

Rode VideoMic Pro vs Takstar SGC 598 are indeed very interesting options for a low-cost external mic that can help you record videos with better audio quality. Rode VideoMic Pro has been widely considered as the best entry-level shotgun mic for video projects. However, some people are still looking for a cheaper option, and Takstar SGC 598 seems to make a viable alternative. It has similar features, yet is priced at a much lower price point. See the comparisons between Rode VideoMic Pro and Takstar SGC 598 below to determine the best model for you!

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Takstar SGC 598

Design
Both models here are shotgun mics, so each of them has that typical long tubular shape. However, Rode VideoMic Pro is actually more compact – we recently discussed about Nikon ME 1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro, so don’t forget to take a look. The shock mount does not eat up so much space on the camera, yet is effective for reducing handling noise. The switches for adjusting the high pass filter and pre-attenuation pad are placed on the rear. So, you can see the settings without having to turn the camera around.

On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 is quite larger and heavier. The bulky shape may make it trickier to handle. The shock mount does reduce handling noise to a degree. The switches for the high pass filter and sensitivity enhancement are on the left side of the body. So, you will need to peek or turn the camera around to see the current settings. One nice thing is that the audio cable is coiled, which means that the cable won’t get into contact with the mic accidentally.

Technical Specs

Rode VideoMic ProTakstar SGC 598
- Frequency Range : 40Hz - 20kHz (selected HPF @80)- Frequency response : 50Hz-16kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Output impedance: 2000 À 30%
- Sensitivity : -32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- Sensitivity : -32dB À 3dB (0dB = 1V/Pa at 1kHz)

Features
Both Rode VideoMic Pro vs Takstar SGC 598 mics have a cardioid polar pattern. They focus capturing the sounds from the direction they are being pointed to while rejecting other sounds from other directions. These mics are great if you want to isolate environmental noise.

Rode VideoMic Pro can be more flexible and versatile due to its features. It comes with a selectable pre-attenuation pad which has three settings: -10dB, 0, and +20dB. So, you can increase or decrease the sensitivity as needed. There is also an optional high pass filter which attenuates LF noise at 80 Hz and lower.

On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 has a switchable +10dB sensitivity enhancement and a low cut filter at 200 Hz. Unfortunately, the low cut filter is set way too high, and this may actually ruin the recording. Avoid using the low cut filter.

Sound Quality
In terms of sound quality, Rode VideoMic Pro is definitely much better. You should choose this model if sound accuracy, definition, and clarity are very important, for example when recording a musical performance. It has a wider frequency response range and better sensitivity, so the output quality is better. On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 is indeed only suitable for purposes that don’t need superior sound accuracy, for example when interviewing.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Takstar SGC 598

- Except for Iphone 7;Level Control: Three-position (-10 dB, 0, +20 dB);Output Impedance 200 ohms
- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) - 20dB-A.Ultra lightweight (85g/3oz). Please refer the Quick Start Guide before use
- 9 V battery operation.Sensitivity:-32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz
- 10dB sensitivity enhancement and 200Hz low-frequency attenuation; to meet the different field Co-use. Use standard universal connector specifications, can be simply fixed the camera
- Product Features: Specially designed for the camera and high-sensitivity condenser microphone to enhance the quality of the recording
- Set tone governing the selection of alloy materials design, sturdy solid, and can effectively shield electromagnetic interference

Conclusion
In the end, Rode VideoMic Pro is the best way to go. This mic is more versatile, and the output quality is much better. This mic is suitable for recording music as well as interviews. On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 is only good for interviews, as it lacks sound accuracy.

Nikon ME 1 Vs Rode VideoMic Pro Comparison

If you want to get the best audio quality in your video projects, you need to equip your DSLR camera with a decent external mic. You can’t rely on the built-in mic in the camera because internal mics can’t really capture the sound from the source with good definition and clarity. Even an entry-level external mic can increase the audio quality significantly. Now, we will discuss about the comparisons between two entry-level external mics that are quite popular on the market, which are Nikon ME 1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro. Which one is better for you?

Nikon ME 1 Vs Rode VideoMic Pro

Dimensions
If you are looking for an external mic that you can easily bring along to places, compactness and portability are probably some of your top priorities. Between these two models, Nikon ME 1 is the one that is more compact and lightweight. It comes with an integrated shock mount and camera mount so that it can be mounted on the top of your camera right away. The audio cable ends in a 3.5 mm jack, and there is a cable stop that helps to keep the cable in place in order to prevent the cable from contacting the mic accidentally.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Pro is relatively bigger and heavier. It extends farther to the front. It also has an integrated camera mount, and the shock mount system is very effective for dampening handling noise. Of course, it is also equipped with a 3.5 mm audio cable. On the rear, you can find the switches for adjusting the pre-attenuation pad and high pass filter. See our previous post about Zoom H1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro, too!

Technical Specs

Nikon ME 1Rode VideoMic Pro
- Frequency response : 70 to 16,000 Hz- Frequency Range : 40Hz - 20kHz (selected HPF @80)
- Type : Back-electret condenser microphone- Output Impedance : 200Ω
- Sensitivity : -42 dB (0dB=1V/Pa, 1kHz)- Sensitivity : -32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Features
The next thing that you need to consider when choosing between Nikon ME 1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro is whether you will benefit more from a stereo mic or a shotgun mic. Nikon ME 1 is actually a stereo mic that is shaped like a shotgun mic. On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Pro is a true shotgun mic.

As a stereo mic, Nikon ME 1 records the sounds into two audio channels. This mic is more suitable if you want to capture the ambiance and three-dimensional effect. Meanwhile, Rode VideoMic Pro is a true shotgun mic that is very effective for capturing the sounds from a single direction and rejecting other sounds from other directions. It is great if you want to focus on a single source and to isolate the source from environmental noise, for example when recording speech.

Performance
In terms of performance, Nikon ME 1 is pretty good. It is a nice choice for beginners, as it is inexpensive. But the frequency response range only goes from 70 Hz – 16 kHz.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Pro offers better performance and output quality, as the frequency response range goes from 40 Hz – 20 kHz and the sensitivity is also better. The maximum SPL handling is also higher. It can capture clearer and more accurate details.

Nikon ME 1 Vs Rode VideoMic Pro

- The ME-1 Stereo Microphone connects to compatible DSLR cameras that have a 3.5mm Mic jack and features new innovation that significantly reduces autofocus noise from being recorded
- Designed for use with a digital SLR camera featuring a 3.5 mm (diameter) stereo mini-pin jack
- Equipped with a cable stop which holds the cable in place to prevent noise from being recorded with accidental contact with the cable
- Except for Iphone 7;Level Control: Three-position (-10 dB, 0, +20 dB);Output Impedance 200 ohms
- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) - 20dB-A.Ultra lightweight (85g/3oz). Please refer the Quick Start Guide before use
- 9 V battery operation.Sensitivity:-32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Conclusion
Unless you really, really prefer to use a stereo mic, Rode VideoMic Pro is more recommended. It has better overall output quality. The output is more accurate and detailed. It is very good for capturing sounds from one direction and rejecting environmental noise.