Browse Category: Shure

Shure Beta 87A Vs 87C Comparison

Looking for a microphone may not an easy task to do. You may have to spend hours on the net and stores to check which item is the most suitable for you and match with the budget you are willing to spend. Beside the type of microphone, you also have to consider what are they best part to get the right item. In today Shure Beta 87A Vs 87C article, we are going to compare these two similar yet different microphones to give you information regarding what you can expect from them.

In this article, we are going to give you information about:
– What are Shure Beta 87A and 87C
– What Shure Beta 87A and 87C can offer to you
– Shure Beta 87A vs 87C

About Shure Beta 87A
The Shure Beta 87A is claimed to be able to deliver a superb quality with an open sound with of course lots of detail and clarity. The mic has a wide dynamic range and can deal with both weak and powerful vocals without the distortion. It is suitable with a well-tuned stage performance because it can cuts through the mix without putting strain on the singer. This one has supercardioid design pattern to achieve superior gain before feedback while giving you a minimum stage bleed.

Unlike many other Shure’s microphones that are dynamic, this one is an electret condenser. This type of microphone usually have higher detail and clarity even though there are a lot of them only can perform great in a sterile studio conditions. The company break this paradigm by creating a masterpiece that has been well-received by both presenters and singer, moreover it is considerably more affordable than many professional condenser, so it can be available for wider user.

Shure Beta 87A Sound Quality
When talking about a microphone, we also have to take a look in the sound quality. This microphone is comparable to any mid-range studio mics without the capricious and require any sophisticated set up like pop filters and windscreen. It comes with low noise preamplifier and electrical stuff with a nice internal shocks protection to minimize the handling noise, so it can be viable and reliable solution without burdening you. The meshes you can find on the unit acts as both pop up filter and windscreen that won’t affect the detail.

The Shure Beta 87A also seems to come with a great ability to work in high sound pressure environment for it is rated with 140dB, so it shouldn’t overload and give you any noticeable distortion. There are many other condenser that will sound unpleasant at the point even though those with higher price. Unlike those dynamic microphone with muddiness characteristic, this one will actually open up your voice. In the details, it can even enhance your voice just like a studio LDC but less sensitive.

When you try listening to the sound, it can produce a quite bright vocals and it will also works for most vocals. But, if you have a very thin vocal, it is recommended to lower it a little bit with EQ, so your sound won’t get brittle. The highest frequency response is at 10kHz and will peaks with some sparkle to give you a hi-fi feel.

Technical Specs

Shure Beta 87AShure Beta 87C
- Frequency Response: 50 to 20,000 Hz- Frequency Response: 50 to 20,000 Hz
- Phantom Supply Requirement: 11 to 52 Vdc, positive at both pins 2 and 3- Phantom Supply Requirement: 11 to 52 Vdc, positive at both pins 2 and 3
- Wide dynamic range (117 dB) and low distortion characteristics- Dynamic Range: 117 dB (maximum SPL to A-weighted noise level)
- Polar Pattern: Supercardioid- Polar Pattern: Cardioid
- Product Dimensions 7.6 x 2 x 2 inches- Product Dimensions 7.6 x 2 x 2 inches

About Shure Beta 87C
Another great microphone that you can get your hand in the market is Shure Beta 87C. Unlike the other model, this one is cardioid instead of supercardioid. If you are not familiar with the term yet, cardioid design will primarily picks up sound within a 130-degree angle in front of the microphone, so it has a reduced sensitivity to the sound comes from the outside that range and will rejects almost all audio that comes from behind the microphone.

At the other side, supercardioid will pick up sound within a 115 degree angle in front of the microphone, so it will have very little sensitivity to the sound that comes beyond 120 degrees off-axis on its either side. But, it will still pick up a narrow range of audio hitting it from directly behind the microphone. The company said that the 87C model is designed for those vocalist who rely on in-ear monitoring or IEM. Read also: Shure SM58 Vs SM57 here.

Shure Beta 87C Sound Quality
Since it has cardioid design, it will be able to pick up a wider field of audio than supercardioid, so you will find more ambiance present in your IEM mix, which is why many vocalist prefer this one than the other model. In the output, if you compare this with 87A, the sound will be noticeably lower and you will need to increase the gain in your mixing board when you use this microphone to reach the almost-equivalent level, so it may not that suitable for those with very soft voice.

If you use the 87C to sing live and instead if IEMS you rely on floor monitors, many people will probably think that the vocalist with 87A is more preferred than 87C because when the monitor placement should be angled to the side if the microphone stand, the 87A will pick up some sound directly behind it and then result in feedback when pushed to high gain level.

These two are able to isolate the vocalist and are undeniably suit solo vocal performance as well as good for a group of singers doing backing vocals. It also did a good job in in minimizing handling noise even though not as good as the SM58.

Comparison
Now, let’s compare the Shure Beta 87A with Shure Beta 87C. As it has been mentioned earlier, the main difference between these two if the design for the original 87A is a supercardioid while the 87C is cardioid. You already know the difference between those designs and the latter has less proximity but better for quite stages or with the monitor placed in the middle while the 87A will work better in conventional stages.

Shure Beta 87A Vs 87C

- Smooth frequency response with gradual presence rise
- Highly consistent super cardioid polar pattern provides superior gain before feedback
- Electronic low-frequency roll off compensates for proximity effect
- Smooth, wide frequency response with slight presence rise
- Uniform cardioid polar pattern for maximum isolation
- Minimum off-axis tone coloration

Conclusion
All in all, the decision is all yours to make. In our opinion, both of them re equally great and it depend on what you are going to use both of them for. However, in this article we will recommend you the Shure Beta 87A for it has better performance in conventional stages as well as has the benefit of tighter cancelation and better GBF. From the price point both of them are in the same range depend on the seller, so it shouldn’t affect your decision.

Shure SM58 Vs SM57 Comparison

Choosing the best microphone for your need is not an easy task to do. You have to consider a lot of things and match them with your main purpose, such as whether it is for vocal or for your instruments. In today Shure SM58 Vs SM57 article, we are going to compare both of these microphones to give you more information regarding what you can expect from them. If one/both of them took your interest, go check our article below.

In this article, we are going to give you information about:
– What are Shure SM58 and SM57
– What Shure SM58 and SM57 Look Like
– What Shure SM58 and SM57 can offer to you
– Shure SM58 vs SM57

About Shure SM58
As we know, you can never go wrong with Shure SM line. The company standard professional like of microphone are the image of professional microphones with acceptable price, so they are available for a wider market. The SM58 is loved by many people for its affordability and practicality in both recording as well as when used for live performance. As one of the bestselling microphone in the market, the exceptional sound quality and outstanding build are the reason why it stands out from its peers.

Shure SM58 Design
This microphone is only able to stand the test of time and more in into pure functionality, so you shouldn’t expect any astonishing appearance comes from the unit. However, when we say about durability, we mean how good it is to survive the rough live of a musician, like when being dropped accidentally. It weighs around 300 grams and connect via 3-pin XLR with a steel material with no plastic here, which is the main reason for its durability.

You may replace the grille or add numerous accessories to prolong the live even longer. The mic comes with a carrying bag from leather material, so if you plan on carrying this around, you may want to purchase a hard case.

Shure SM58 Capabilities
When talking about microphone, the most important thing should be the sound quality. The SM 58 has a good sound characteristic but if you want to improve it, try connect it to a mixer with good characteristics, audio interface or use X2u bundle version. All the technical features on the mic shows a clear usage of the unit, which is vocal and speech. It is a cardioid microphone, which polar pattern eliminates unwanted noises and will definitely works great when combined with pop filter.

The microphone also has another innovative feature in this model, which called Pneumatic shock-mount systems that will cut down handling noise. With this feature, you can rest assure about unpredictable noises from external mechanical impacts. In the high notes, the cardioid design makes it less fussy about monitor placement. Its frequency response is listed at 50Hz to 12kHz and has a rich mid-range. In around 7.5kHz, the mic will dips slightly to help vocal cut through mix without becoming sibilant.

The SM58 is suitable for people who will perform on stage or those who need it to use in an outdoor setting with some loudspeaker. The perfect users will range from pro vocalist to church pastors giving speeches. You may also use it with instruments too but it is better to pair it with some VST EQ software or analog EQ after microphone signal.

Techinical Specs

Shure SM58Shure SM57
- Type Dynamic- Microphone Type Dynamic
- Frequency Response 50 to 15,000 Hz- Frequency Response 40 to 15,000 Hz
- Polar Pattern Cardioid- Polar Pattern Cardioid
- Sensitivity (at 1,000 Hz Open Circuit Voltage) : -54.5 dBV/Pa (1.85 mV), 1 Pa = 94 dB SPL- Microphone Form Factor: Handheld/Stand-Held
- Impedance Rated impedance is 150 Ohms (300 Ohms actual) for connection to microphone inputs rated low impedance- Output Impedance 150 ohms
- Connector Three-pin professional audio connector (male XLR type)- Connector(s): XLR 3 Pin
- Net Weight 298 grams (10.5 oz)- Weight 0.63 lbs
- Dimensions 162 mm (6-3/8 in.) L x 51 mm (2 in.) W- Connectivity: Wired

About Shure SM57
The SM57 are often compared with its brother to see which one is better than the other. These two microphones are very similar yet also different. As one of the SM model, you already know how good they are in a very wide range of music as well as when used to record multiple instruments. It is loved by many people since first launched and still continue up until now. When surfing the net, you will see so many good reviews about this mic and they are true.

Shure SM57 Design
Just like many other Shure’s mic, this one feels great when hold. It has a funky and vintage appearance but very durable, which makes it last forever in your equipment compartment if treated properly. The unit is quite heavy at 1.25 pounds with metal capsule unlike some cheap mics. When you look at the product name, you may find there is some with “LC” name and some without. LC stands for “less cable” because the former product that bundled with XLR cable are discontinued. Read also: Sennheiser E835 Review here.

Shure SM57 Capabilities
The SM57 is able to grab both high and low frequencies thanks for being dynamic microphone. What’s makes them great for stage use is the high gain before feedback functionality, so it will give you a very high volume without hearing that pesky screeching noise. Many people are using the microphone strictly for vocals, but in reality you can use it for instruments, which is why it is very well-known for the great versatility.

The cardioid pattern in the unit makes it even more exceptional since it is designed to focus on the main source of sound while simultaneously decreasing background noise to give you a good isolation. You may even see some drummers have several of this mic at a time because even though they are relatively near to each other, they are able to pick each piece of their kit to give them all separate sound sources.

The SM57 also doesn’t necessarily need phantom power, so even though you don’t have a recorders/audio interface/mixers with the feature, you will be just fine. However, it is still recommended to use it with something that can help increase the gain to get the full power of the microphone.

Comparison
Now, let’s compare Shure SM58 with SM57. When looking at them from the internal parts, they are identical microphones but from the outside, SM58 has this round ball on top of it as well as an internal windscreen. This additional features force the mic to be farther from the source while the windscreen will dampen the high frequency and cut wind noise. At the other hand SM57 has shorter grille design to allow it closer to the source and has better proximity effect as well as more susceptible to wind noise.

Shure SM58 Vs SM57

- Frequency response tailored for vocals, with brightened midrange and bass rolloff to control proximity effect
- Effective built-in spherical wind and pop filter
- Pneumatic shock-mount system cuts down handling noise
- Uniform cardioid pickup pattern isolates the main sound source and minimizes background noise
- Contoured frequency response is clean, instrumental reproduction and rich vocal pickup
- Professional-quality reproduction for drum, precussion, and instrument amplifier miking
- Uniform cardioid pickup pattern isolates the main source while reducing background noise
- Extremely durable under heaviest use

Conclusion
All in all, the decision is all yours to make. In our opinion, both of them are equally great depend on what you want to use them for. If you are strictly want to use it for vocal on stage, the SM58 is the better choice while for instrument and recording on studio SM57 is the better choice added with a pop filter in front of it.

Shure MV88 Vs MV51 Comparison

Shure’s Motiv microphones are truly awesome. These mobile-friendly microphones allow artists and podcasters to have a new way to capture quality sound whenever and wherever they go. However, the different models may confuse you – which model is actually the best for you? In this article, we will help you choose the right mic by comparing Shure MV88 vs MV51.

Both Shure MV88 and Shure MV51 are available in a similar price range. However, they have very different features and are suitable for different needs. Below, you can find out more about:
– Which mic that is more portable and easier to carry around,
– The distinctive advantages or benefits of each mic,
– The suitable uses of Shure MV88 vs MV51, and
– Which Shure Motiv model that is more recommended for the money.

Size and Weight
First of all, let’s take a look at the size and weight of each microphone here. As mentioned above, these two microphones are very different. Shure MV88 much smaller and lighter. It has a diameter of 0.71 inches and a length of about 2.658 inches. The weight is only 1.43 oz. The compact and lightweight design makes this mic a lot more portable, suitable to bring along for field recording. See also: Shure MV88 vs Rode iXY.

On the other hand, Shure MV51 is quite significantly bigger and heavier. The width is about 3.4 inches whereas the length is a little above 5.0 inches. It has a weight of about 20.27 oz. While it is still easy to move around, it is definitely not as handy as the MV88. This microphone is more suitable for studio recording or indoor use.

Polar Pattern
The special feature of Shure MV88 is that it comes with four selectable polar patterns, which are stereo, mid-side, mono bidirectional, and mono cardioid. These polar patterns allow you to adapt the mic as needed to suit different uses and environments. The stereo polar pattern is very nice because you can adjust the width. Meanwhile, the mono bidirectional polar pattern is great for recording interviews.

On the other hand, Shure MV51 only has one polar pattern which is cardioid. It captures sound signals from the front, it does not capture from the sides and rear. This polar pattern is suitable when you want to focus capturing from a single direction. It is suitable for most music recordings.

Technical Specs

Shure MV88Shure MV51
- Transducer Type : Cardioid (1cm), Bidirectional Condenser Cartridge (1cm) - Transducer Type : Electret Condenser
- Polar Pattern : Adjustable Width Stereo / Mono Bidirectional / Mono Cardioid / Mid-Side- Polar Pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency Response : 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz- Frequency Response : 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz

Connectivity
Shure MV88 connects to an iOS device using the Lightning connector. It is very simple to use. It does not need any cable. According to Shure, you just need to plug the integrated connector to the port. The mic is designed to sit on the top of the device.

On the other hand, Shure MV51 supports USB and Lightning connections. It needs the suitable cable to connect to your device. One nice thing is that it is compatible with virtually any device – it can work with an iOS, Android, Mac, or PC.

Performance
In general, both mics have very good sound quality. They have relatively low noise, while being crisp and accurate. Each of them also comes with several built-in DSP presets that can enhance the sound character and overall quality.

Shure MV88 is very good for field recordings, interviews, and podcasts as the sound is crisp and detailed. However, note that the maximum SPL handling is only 120 dB. It won’t be able to handle loud voices or instruments.

On the other hand, Shure MV51 is excellent for musical recordings. It has a higher maximum SPL handling, up to 130 dB. So, it can handle loud vocals or instruments. The sound is also more full-bodied, more musical, and naturally warm.

Shure MV88 Vs MV51

- 5 DSP preset modes (Speech, Singing, Flat, Acoustic Instrument, Loud)
- Automatically adjusts EQ, compression and limiting for optimal results.Headphone output:Available through Apple device
- Matched cardioid and bi-directional 1 cm cartridges for best-in-class audio
- Mid-side architecture for a phase-perfect, clear stereo image
- 5 DSP Preset Modes (Speech, Singing, Flat, Acoustic Instrument, Loud)
- Automatically adjusts Gain, EQ, Compression and Limiting for optimal results
- Front panel touch controls for mode selection, headphone volume, microphone gain, and mute
- Built-in headphone output for real-time monitoring

Conclusion
For a versatile microphone, Shure MV88 is the way to go. It is more portable, and it comes with multiple polar patterns that allow you to adapt to different conditions. On the other hand, Shure MV51 is more specialized for musical recordings.

Shure MV5 Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Shure MV5 and Blue Yeti are interesting options for a USB mic. Both of these microphones can be used with your computer via USB. However, they offer very different advantages. Shure MV5 is more portable, whereas Blue Yeti is adjustable for different desktop conditions. See the detailed comparisons of Shure MV5 vs Blue Yeti below!

By reading the following article, you will find out more about:
– The unique features available on Shure MV5 vs Blue Yeti,
– The supported connections and platforms of the two mics,
– The comparisons of their sound quality, and
– Which mic that is more recommended for the money.

Size and Weight
Perhaps the first thing that you need to consider when choosing between these two microphones is their dimensions. Do you need your mic to be highly portable? If so, Shure MV5 is more suitable for you. Unlike the competitor here, Shure MV5 is very compact and lightweight. The actual mic is shaped like a ball while featuring a grille that looks just like the famous Elvis mic. The mic comes with a stand that is also quite compact and lightweight.

The mic’s position on the stand is adjustable. Also, you can just remove the stand when it is not used. So, the whole thing is very practical and adaptable. The controls are near the bottom of the mic with the connection ports. See the complete review here: Shure MV5 Review.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti is more suitable for desktop usage. The mic’s stand, although adjustable, is not very portable. It is rather bulky and somewhat heavier. Still, the build quality is very good. The housing feels sturdy and durable. Blue Yeti also looks stylish. There are several color choices, such as black, silver, platinum, blue, teal, red, and slate.

Technical Specs

Shure MV5Blue Yeti
- Type : Condenser- Capsules : condenser, pressure gradient
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Patterns : cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, stereo
- Frequency Response : 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz- Frequency Response : 20Hz - 20kHz

Features
If you work with Apple devices, Shure MV5 may be better due to the Lightning connector. This mic has both Lightning and USB connectors, so it is very versatile. According to Shure, this mic can work with PC, Mac, Android, and iOS. It also has the Apple MFi certification, ensuring full compatibility with any iOS device.

Shure MV5 has a cardioid polar pattern, which means that it captures sound signals from the front. There are three built-in DSP presets (vocal, instrument, flat) that are useful for enhancing the sound quality in different applications. There is a headphone output for direct monitoring, too.

Blue Yeti uses USB. It is compatible with Windows and Mac OS X platforms. Some users say that it also works on some Linux distros and Android (the Android platform needs to support USB OTG). However, it doesn’t work with iPad or iOS.

Blue Yeti comes with four selectable polar patterns, which include cardioid, stereo, omnidirectional, and bidirectional. These polar patterns allow you to adjust the mic to have the best pickup in different conditions. For example, cardioid is great when there is just one person talking, whereas bidirectional is useful for dialogues and interviews. There are headphone output, mute button, and gain control.

Sound Quality
In terms of sound quality, the two mics are really comparable to each other, so you are not going to miss an important advantage. In general, both mics sound clear and detailed. Shure MV5 may become more musical and more pleasant to hear if you use either the vocal or the instrument DSP preset. However, Blue Yeti does offer excellent accuracy and tonality, too.

Shure MV5 Vs Blue Yeti

- 3 DSP Preset Modes (Vocals, Flat, Instrument)
- Automatically applies gain, EQ, compression and limiting for optimal results
- Built-in headphone output for real-time monitoring
- Custom-tuned microphone capsule provides best-in-class audio
- Available in 2 colors gray with black foam and black with red foam
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output. Dimensions (extended in stand) : 4.72 x 4.92 x 11.61 inches
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls
- Compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8 (including 8.1), Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP

Conclusion
Choosing between Shure MV5 and Blue Yeti is indeed difficult, but in the end, Shure MV5 is the winner. It is slightly better in terms of value. It is more portable, and it has multiple connectivity options. It can work with a wide range of platforms, including mobile devices. The sound quality is good, too.

Shure MV5 Review: Affordable yet Very Versatile

Finding a decent portable mic may be quite a challenge. Such mics often have limited features and low quality. However, Shure MV5 is quite different from the others. At first, it may remind you of the legendary ‘Elvis microphone’, except that it is digital and smaller. Continue reading Shure MV5 review below to see the great things of this mic!

Below, you can find the information about:
– The special features of Shure MV5,
– The platforms supported by Shure MV5,
– The sound quality of Shure MV5, and
– The recommendation whether to buy or not to buy Shure MV5.

Design
Shure MV5 is shaped like a ball with a diameter of about 2.6 inches and a weight of about 90 grams without the mounting stand. The pattern of the grille is similar to that of the legendary ‘Elvis microphone’. It does look nice and stylish. However, both the body and grille are made of plastic, so they aren’t very durable. For live applications, take a look at Sennheiser E945 vs Shure Beta 58A!

The mic comes with a mounting stand and everything you need to get started right away. The mounting stand is made of duralumin, and is capable of doing a good job in suspending the mic. You can adjust the mic’s position by adjusting the nut. You can easily carry the mic along with the accessories wherever you go.

Connectivity
One of the best things about Shure MV5 is that it is compatible with virtually any device. It features a micro USB output and comes with the suitable cables for connecting to a USB connector or a Lightning connector. In other words, Shure MV5 can work with Windows, Linux, and Mac. In addition, Shure says that it is compatible with Android and iOS devices. The versatile connectivity makes this mic suitable for people who often work with different platforms.

On the back, there is also a 3.5 mm headphone port for real-time monitoring. This is very handy for direct monitoring while you are recording. There is a control knob for adjusting the headphone volume.

However, it has no on-board control for adjusting the gain level – to adjust the gain level, you need to access the mic’s settings on your computer or on the mobile app. Fortunately, you don’t really need to tinker with the settings as Shure MV5 already sounds good right out of the box.

Sound Quality
Shure MV5 is surprisingly able to deliver decent sound quality. The dynamic range is good, and it can handle high SPL easily without clipping. It has low noise levels, ensuring good sound clarity. Well, the clarity is still not comparable to those high-end mics, but it is definitely good enough to be usable and useful. There is no hiss that is often associated with cheap mics.

Shure MV5 has a cardioid polar pattern. It does a good job in focusing on the source while attenuating environmental noise. The sound accuracy is good, thanks to the wide frequency response range. The built-in A/D converter also ensures good sound quality.

Shure MV5 comes with three built-in DSP presets. They are actually useful for their intended purposes. These presets allow lower compression levels and some EQ touches that enhance the brightness. If you prefer raw or unprocessed output, you can use the ‘flat’ preset and tweak the EQ later in the software.

PriceFeatures

- Apple MFi (Made for iPhone/iPod/iPad) Certified for direct connection to any iOS device without the need for any additional adapters or connection kits - 3 DSP Preset Modes (Vocals, Flat, Instrument) - Automatically applies gain, EQ, compression and limiting for optimal results - Built-in headphone output for real-time monitoring - Custom-tuned microphone capsule provides best-in-class audio - Available in 2 colors gray with black foam and black with red foam - Included anodized aluminum desktop stand and integrated thread mount compatible with any standard 1/4" camera tripod thread

Conclusion
If you are looking for an affordable yet versatile mic with good sound quality, Shure MV5 is a very good choice. It is quite portable, it is compatible with almost any platform, and it has decent sound quality.

Shure MV5: Specifications
Dimensions H×W×D (w/ Mounting Stand): 89 mm × 142 mm × 97 mm
Weight (w/ Mounting Stand): 160 grams / 5.6 oz
Housing: PC/ABS and Die-Cast Zinc Frame
DSP Presets: Voice/Instrument/Flat
MFi Certified: Yes
Type: Electret condenser (16 mm)
Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 20 kHz
Polar Pattern: Cardioid Unidirectional
A/D Converter: 24-bit/48 kHz
Maximum SPL: 130 dB SPL
Gain Range: Adjustable from 0 to +36 dB
Mute Button: Yes
Headphone Out: 3.5 mm (1/8″)
Power Requirements: Powered by USB or Lightning connector
Includes:
• one Micro-B-to-USB cable
• one Micro-B-to-Lightning cable
• mounting stand
• stand adapter ¼”
• 20-thread (standard tripod mount)

Shure MV5 Review: Pros and Cons
Pros:
• Low noise, good sound quality
• Compatible with virtually any device
• Useful DSP presets for different needs
• Has real-time monitoring
• Affordable price
Cons:
• The plastic body isn’t very durable

Shure MV5: Price
Check the best price for Shure MV5 here!

Shure KSM9 Vs Neumann KMS 105 Comparison

A microphone for live performances needs to have good sound quality, but at the same time it should be able to avoid capturing environmental noise. Hence, finding a good microphone for such purpose is often tricky and confusing. No worries! Below, we will help you choose between two popular mics for live applications, Shure KSM9 vs Neumann KMS 105.

These are high-class mics available in a similar price range. At first, they may seem identical. However, there are some distinctive differences that set them apart. Below, you can find out more about:
– The different sound characters of the two microphones,
– The features of Shure KSM9 vs Neumann KMS 105, and
– Which mic that is more reliable and easier to use in live settings.

Design and Features
First of all, both Shure KSM9 and Neumann KMS 105 come with dual polar patterns. Each of them has two selectable polar patterns, cardioid and supercardioid. This allows for great versatility in adapting to different environments. The cardioid polar pattern is generally good enough for solo performances. The supercardioid polar pattern has a narrower pickup angle, so it may be handy when there are other performers on the stage.

Shure KSM9 is available in two color choices, champagne and charcoal gray. It claims to have premium-grade electronic components and gold-plated internal and external connectors for the best durability and sound quality. The output connector is XLR, but there is a wireless model is available. It comes with an advanced suspension shock mount that does a very good job. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs AKG C414.

Neumann KMS 105 is also available in two color choices, nickel and matte black. It comes in a robust metal housing that has been optimized to reduce handling noise. The bundle also includes a stand mount, which is handy and useful. According to Neumann, this mic has a transformerless output, and the pop shielding is said to be effective in reducing plosives and wind noise without any side effect on the sound quality.

Technical Specs

Shure KSM9Neumann KMS 105
- Directional Polar Patterns: Cardioid, Supercardioid- Directional Pattern : Cardioid / Supercardioid
- Frequency Response: 50 to 20,000 Hz- Frequency Range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms (actual)- Rated impedance : 50 ohms
- Sensitivity (typical; at 1000 Hz; 1 Pa = 94 dB SPL): -51 dBV/Pa- Maximum SPL for THD : 150 dB

Sound Quality
One distinctive advantage of Shure KSM9 is that it is quite less sensitive than Neumann KMS 105. The lower sensitivity allows Shure KSM9 to focus on the user’s voice without picking up any sound from other directions. Because of this, Shure KSM9 is much easier to use when there are other singers or instruments on the stage.

On the other hand, Neumann KMS 105 is quite more sensitive. This may be a good thing for a solo performance, when there are no other sound signals on the stage. However, using Neumann KMS 105 when there are other performers may be difficult and frustrating due to the mic picking up other sound signals.

Nevertheless, both mics have good sound accuracy. Shure KSM9 tends to be a little brighter, whereas Neumann KMS 105 has better bass depth due to the wider frequency response range. Both mics have very high maximum SPL, and they can easily handle loud voices without clipping.

Shure KSM9 Vs Neumann KMS 105

- Zippered carrying case
- Dual gold layered, low-mass Mylar diaphragm design
- Switchable polar patterns (supercardioid and cardioid)
- Advanced suspension shock mount
- Neumann sound on stage
- Highly detailed condenser mic for demanding on stage applications
- Robust metal housing reduces handling noise
- Includes stand mount and padded nylon bag

Conclusion
Between the two mics, we recommend you to choose Shure KSM9. It is quite easier to use, especially when there are other sounds on the stage. It does not pick up environmental noise. The features are similar to Neumann KMS 105, such as the dual selectable polar patterns and high SPL handling.

Sennheiser E945 Vs Shure Beta 58A Comparison

If you are confused in choosing between Sennheiser E945 vs Shure Beta 58A, you have come to the right place. Below, we will see the comparisons between these two supercardioid vocal mics based on several factors. While they are both quite popular, one of them offers noticeably better clarity and overall sound quality.

By reading this article, you will understand better about:
– The similarities between Sennheiser E945 vs Shure Beta 58A,
– Their differences and performance comparison, and
– Which one is the best mic for the money.

Design
Sennheiser E945 is a little heavier than Shure Beta 58A. It weighs about 12.875 oz. One reason behind the weight is the rugged metal construction. It is very tough and durable, and it can withstand usage abuse. In addition, it also has a shock-mounted capsule which reduces handling and mechanical noise. The grille is very durable, too.

Compared to the other mic here, Sennheiser E945 indeed looks more elegant and classy. The grille is not overly bulky, and the color has been toned down to suit the black body.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58A looks just like your typical microphone. It has a round, fat spherical grille. Nevertheless, this model is slightly lighter at just 9.9 oz, so it may be a little more convenient to handle. The mesh grille is made of hardened steel which is very durable. It also has a pneumatic shock mount system to minimize vibrations and mechanical noise. See also: Sennheiser E935 vs Beta 58.

Technical Specs

Sennheiser E945Shure Beta 58A
- Frequency response : 40 - 18000 Hz- Frequency Response : 50 to 16,000 Hz
- Nominal impedance : 350 Ω- Rated impedance : 150 ohms
- Sensitivity in free field, no load (1kHz) 2,0mV/Pa = -54dB (0 dB = 1V/Pa) = -74 dB (0 dB = 1V/ubar)- Polar Pattern : Supercardioid, rotationally symmetrical about microphone axis, uniform with frequency

Polar Pattern
Both Sennheiser E945 and Shure Beta 58A are supercardioid dynamic microphones. As dynamic microphones, they offer excellent performance on live stages. They also have excellent reliability and durability, as they are less affected by impacts compared to their condenser counterparts.

Being supercardioidmics, Sennheiser E945 and Shure Beta 58A offers great resistance against feedback and environment noise. According to StackExchange, supercardioid has more side rejection than cardioid polar patterns.These micshave very narrow pick-up angles, so they can focus only on the singer’s voice while rejecting other sounds from other directions. These are great mics for live situations.

Sound Quality
As mentioned above, Sennheiser E945 and Shure Beta 58A have noticeably different sound qualities. In general, Sennheiser E945 is better. It has a wider frequency response range of 40 Hz – 18 kHz. As the effect, it can capture sounds from lower and higher frequencies, hence delivering more accurate overall sound.

Sennheiser E945 has excellent clarity. It can capture the singer’s voice very clearly. It already sounds great without needing much tweaking.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58A actually has good overall sound quality, but the clarity and accuracy just can’t match Sennheiser E945. Shure Beta 58A has a frequency response range of 50 Hz – 16 kHz. It usually requires the user to tweak the EQ in order to get the most accurate sound.

Sennheiser E945 Vs Shure Beta 58A

- Shock-mounted capsule: Low sensitivity to impact and handling noise
- Supercardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- Frequency response tailored for vocals, with brightened midrange and bass roll off to control proximity effect
- Uniform super cardioid pattern for high gain before feedback and superior rejection off axis sound
- Neodymium magnet for high signal to noise output

Conclusion
Between Sennheiser E945 vs Shure Beta 58A, we highly recommend you to choose Sennheiser E945. This mic has a better, more elegant design and better sound quality. The output has higher clarity and accuracy, and it does not need much tweaking to sound great.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Shure Beta 87A Comparison

We are going to see the comparisons between Sennheiser E935 vs Shure Beta 87A on several aspects such as durability, features, and sound quality. Both Sennheiser E935 and Shure Beta 87A are great vocal mics that have amassed lots of positive reviews from their users. They both are said to have very good sound quality. However, Sennheiser E935 is a dynamic microphone available at a lower price point, whereas Shure Beta 87A is a more expensive condenser microphone.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Shure Beta 87A

Size and Weight
Sennheiser E935 feels solid and rugged. It is just about the right size to be handled comfortably. It has a metal construction which protects the mic against any environment and usage abuse. However, this mic is quite heavier at 355 grams. The heavy weight is due to the metal construction and the dynamic moving coil and membrane system.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 87A has a bigger metallic grille due to the built-in pop filter. It also has a cartridge shock-mount system. Compared to Sennheiser E935, Shure Beta 87A is lighter at 207 grams.

See also : Sennheiser E935 Vs Beta 58 Comparison.

Maximum SPL Handling and Sensitivity
The next difference is the maximum SPL handling. Sennheiser E935 is a dynamic microphone, so you can expect this microphone to have good maximum SPL handling. However, the manufacturer does not specify the actual level of the maximum SPL handling. So, it is difficult to tell how powerful the mic is. Nevertheless, Sennheiser E935 is able to handle most loud singers just fine, and the performance is good enough for on-stage uses.

On the other hand,Shure Beta 87A boasts a maximum SPL handling of 140.5 dB. That is quite a high level. This mic is powerful enough to handle the voice of most singers, except the very loud ones. A very loud vocal may have a sound pressure level of about 150 dB.

Sennheiser E935 has a slightly higher sensitivity than Shure Beta 87A. As the effect, Sennheiser E935 can capture more audio details better. If you are trying to capture the fine details of a subtle sound, this mic is great. However, when handling a very high sound pressure level, you should use a unit with a lower sensitivity.

Technical Specs

Sennheiser E935Shure Beta 87A
- Type : Dynamic- Type : Condenser (electret bias)
- Frequency Response : 40 - 18000 Hz- Frequency Response : 50 to 20,000 Hz
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Supercardioid

Polar Pattern
Sennheiser E935 vs Shure Beta 87A have different polar patterns. Sennheiser E935 comes with a cardioid polar pattern. It captures sound signals coming from the front while rejecting signals from the sides and rear. This polar pattern has a very good ability in reducing environmental noise.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 87A comes with a supercardioid polar pattern. This polar pattern is useful when you really need to minimize the possibility of feedback, as the pick-up angle is narrower. However, it is somewhat more prone to environmental noise because it can also capture some signals from the rear.

Frequency Response
Sennheiser E935 has a frequency response range of 40 Hz – 18 kHz. Compared to Shure Beta 87A, this mic has a deeper reach into the bass area. The sound tends to be warmer with good clarity and accuracy. This mic is suitable for all kinds of users.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 87A has a frequency response range of 50 Hz – 20 kHz. As expected of a condenser mic, Shure Beta 87A tends to sound bright and crisp. It also has good clarity. While it is definitely usable for most types of users, it is especially great for singers with deep voices. It will improve the vocal’s presence.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Shure Beta 87A

- Shock mounted capsule with humbucking coil
- Cardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- Smooth frequency response with gradual presence rise
- Highly consistent super cardioid polar pattern provides superior gain before feedback
- Electronic low-frequency roll off compensates for proximity effect

Conclusion
If you want to get the most value out of your money, Sennheiser E935 is the way to go. This dynamic mic is more affordable. It is quite versatile, suitable for a wide range of users. In addition, it is also more durable and more resistant to environmental noise. However, if you really prefer a condenser or supercardioid mic, Shure Beta 87A can be your choice.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Beta 58 Comparison

Sennheiser and Shure continue their competition, this time with their dynamic handheld mics Sennheiser E935 and Shure Beta 58. Both are said to be suitable for live performances as well as studio uses. So, which one of them is actually better? Below, we will try to clear the confusion and see the actual differences between Sennheiser E935 vs Beta 58 to help you choose the best mic for the money. So, continue reading!

Sennheiser E935 Vs Beta 58

Design
Of the two, Sennheiser E935 looks better. It comes with an all-black color scheme, whereas the name of the product is written in white. It has a metal construction that is highly rugged and durable, and it is certainly ready to face travel and usage abuse. The metal grille is also black, and is rather compact. As a result, this mic looks elegant and professional. It happens to be a little bit heavier at 12.5 oz.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 comes with a more traditional look. The black housing is also rugged and durable. But it comes with a silver metal spherical grille. It looks plain and conventional. Nevertheless, the design works effectively. Don’t forget to check our previous post about the sibling, Sennheiser E935 vs Shure SM58.

Polar Pattern and Reception
Note that Sennheiser E935 vs Shure Beta 58 have different polar patterns. Sennheiser E935 is a cardioid mic, which means that it captures sounds only from the front while rejecting other sounds from other directions. It rejects environmental noise very well. On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 is a supercardioid mic. This mic also focuses on capturing sounds from the front. However, the rear rejection is not as strong. As the effect, this mic tends to be more susceptible to noise and feedback from the rear. But, to be fair, this mic still resists noise and feedback pretty well.

Technical Specs

Sennheiser E935Beta 58
- Pick-up pattern : Cardioid- Pick-up pattern : Supercardioid
- Frequency Response : 40 - 18000 Hz- Frequency Response : 50 to 16,000 Hz
- Sensitivity : 2,8mV/Pa = -51dB- Open Circuit Voltage: -51.5 dBV/Pa* (2.6 mV) *1 Pa = 94 dB SPL

Performance
Both Sennheiser E935 and Shure Beta 58 are generally great. They have very good sound quality. They are quite versatile for various applications and purposes. They both are also somewhat sensitive to plosives, so you may need a pop filter to reduce the plosives.

Many people prefer Sennheiser E935 because it gives more presence to the vocal. It produces very good midrange and treble. In general, it also sounds rounder and fuller. The output is smooth and warm, and the output is also crisp with good clarity. One more nice thing about Sennheiser E935 is that it doesn’t have too much low-end so that it won’t produce too much boom. Sennheiser E935 is suitable for both male and female vocals and various genres.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 has more low-end presence. The vocal presence is good, but not as great as Sennheiser E935. But you can choose this mic if you need to bump up the low-end presence. Shure Beta 58 is good for rock vocals.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Beta 58

- Made for the working musician
- Shock mounted capsule with humbucking coil
- Metal construction
- Cardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- Frequency response tailored for vocals, with brightened midrange and bass rolloff to control proximity effect
- Uniform supercardioid pattern for high gain before feedback and superior rejection of off-axis sound
- Neodymium magnet for high signal-to-noise output
- Hardened steel mesh grille that resists wear and abuse
- Bundle includes Shure Beta 58A Supercardioid Microphone, Boom Stand, 25-Foot XLR Cable, Windscreen, and Polishing Cloth

Conclusion
In general, Sennheiser E935 is the better choice. It has a more elegant design, and the performance is great and versatile. It produces better vocal presence that is crisp and clear. On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 tends to produce more low-end.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Shure SM58 Comparison

Both Sennheiser E935 and Shure SM58 are high-quality dynamic mics that are very popular on the market. They are sold at reasonable prices, yet they offer great sound quality and performance. These mics are widely used for both live and studio uses. However, before you make a mic purchase, you need to know that Sennheiser E935 and Shure SM58 have different features and characteristics. As the effect, one of them may be more suitable for you than the other. See the differences of Sennheiser E935 vs Shure SM58 below!

Sennheiser E935 Vs Shure SM58

Design
In terms of appearance, Sennheiser E935 is a good-looking elegant mouse. It doesn’t use the traditional spherical grill. Instead, it features a minimalist black grill that is rugged and durable. Overall, this mic is slimmer and more compact. It appears stylish and professional. We have also compared the sibling in Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58, so take a look!

The mic is especially designed for working musicians. It is highly rugged and durable. The metal construction protects the internal parts from impacts. The mic uses a shock-mounted capsule with a humbucking coil. The boron-enhanced neodymium ferrous magnet ensures that the mic can stay stable and perform well in all climates. The mic has a cardioid pickup pattern. Note that this mic does not have an on/off switch.

On the other hand, Shure SM58 appears much more conventional. It features a built-in spherical wind and pop filter. The ball-like metallic grill, despite its traditional design, is sturdy and durable. The construction features a pneumatic shock-mount system which functions to cut down the noise caused by handling vibrations. This model is also a cardioid mic, and it has an on/off switch so that you can easily control the mic.

Technical Specs

Sennheiser E935Shure SM58
- Pick-up pattern : Cardioid- Pick-up pattern : Cardioid (unidirectional) dynamic
- Frequency Response : 40 - 18000 Hz- Frequency response: 50 to 15,000 Hz
- Sensitivity : 2,8mV/Pa = -51dB- Sensitivity : -54.5 dBV/Pa (1.85 mV)

Performance
There are several things to consider when choosing between Sennheiser E935 vs Shure SM58. Compared to Shure SM58, Sennheiser E935 has a wider frequency response range, which is 40 Hz – 18 kHz. In other words, it is actually able to capture sounds at lower and higher frequencies. It also has a higher sensitivity level which is 2.8mV/Pa. Many users have said that this mic has noticeably better clarity and accuracy.

However, Sennheiser E935 has more pronounced midrange and treble. Some people who have been used to Shure SM58 think that Sennheiser E935 cannot produce bass with significant presence, which can be a little bit problematic for bass vocal. Pumping the bass in the EQ will result in a feedback. However, the trick is actually lowering and adjusting the midrange and treble so that they won’t cover the bass.

Shure SM58 has a frequency response range of 50 Hz – 15 kHz and a sensitivity level of -54.5dBV/P. The overall performance is good, especially because the mic has a proximity effect which helps to boost the bass presence. However, it does not bring as much clarity as Sennheiser E935.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Shure SM58

- Cardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- Made for the working musician
- Shock mounted capsule with humbucking coil
- Metal construction: Rugged and reliable
- Frequency response tailored for vocals, with brightened midrange and bass rolloff to control proximity effect
- Uniform cardioid pickup pattern isolates the main sound source and minimizes background noise
- Pneumatic shock-mount system cuts down handling noise
- Effective built-in spherical wind and pop filter
- On/off switch for onstage control

Conclusion
All in all, Sennheiser E935 is more recommended because the mic has better clarity and sound accuracy. It is very good for vocal. However, if you need a mic with more pronounced bass, Shure SM58 can be your choice. Shure SM58 can also be the alternative if you need the on/off switch for easy control.