Electro-Voice RE20 Vs RE320

The Electro-Voice RE20 Vs RE320 are high-quality dynamic microphones. They are famous for broadcasting purposes, and they have a similar sound quality and characters for being close siblings. The two are not cheap options but worth considering if you like what they can offer. Before deciding which microphone you like better, let’s see how they compare below.

In this comparison, we are going to talk about:

  • How to Choose the Best Microphone
  • What are Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320
  • How is the Design of Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320
  • How is the Setup for Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320
  • How are the Specs of Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320
  • How are the Sound Characters of Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320
  • What are the Features of Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320
  • How is the Performance of Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320
  • Electro-Voice RE20 Vs RE320

Choosing a Microphone

The microphone is essential recording equipment that everyone who works with audio will need. Whether you are making a podcast, streaming video games, making video content, or sharing your music, the microphone plays a vital role in the setup. It is what captures the sound you want to use, and we want it to be easy to use with fewer technical problems. Not everyone will choose the same microphone, so the decision is subjective. Everyone may agree that Neumann TLM 103 is a great microphone, but not everyone will want to use it.

When choosing a microphone, many wonder which one is the best, but this question doesn’t have a definitive answer because there is no perfect product. Usually, you can pick a good one from the price point. The mic doesn’t have to cost thousands to be good, but we can guess from the budget you are willing to spend and avoid questionably cheap alternatives. A different voice also benefits from different microphones, and not all vocalists will be happy using the same model or brand.

For example, large-diaphragm models such as Neumann TLM 103 Vs Warm Audio WA87 are ideal for picking up lower frequencies such as deep male voice, a bass drum, or a bass guitar. On the other hand, small diaphragm microphones are suitable for picking up high frequencies like female voices and cymbals. You can check the frequency response of the mic you want to buy and match it with your application. Not every microphone is suitable for everyone, and it is wise to buy according to how you want to use it.

 Electro-Voice RE20Electro-Voice RE320
Product Dimensions1 x 1 x 9 inches
1 x 1 x 9 inches
Shipping Weight1 pounds 1 pounds
Shop now at Amazonclick hereclick here

About Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320

Of course, there is an easier way to choose one by considering the prevalent models for your specific application, such as for singing, broadcasting, or recording instruments. While there is no guarantee that you will like them, at least we get an idea of what models to look for. There are plenty of good microphones, especially those coming from well-known names. It is reassuring to shop from reputable brands because they tend to produce better products, and there are accessible communities to ask around.

We assume this microphone is for broadcasting or primarily recording voice if you are here. This type of microphone tends to produce a comfortable sound character that flatters your voice and has good rejection. For this purpose, some of the most well-known models are Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320. Electro-Voice is an old player, and the RE20 has been one of the crowd’s favorites for decades. It is still going strong today even with the plethora of cheaper models, including its little brother RE320.

The overall sound quality of Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 is very similar. While the RE320 is cheaper, which is probably why you want to compare the two, it doesn’t sound the same as the RE20. We think the RE320 is too bright for some people’s taste. The microphone seems to pronounce the higher frequency stronger than RE20. It is an excellent choice if you prefer this character or want to capture your voice’s highs during recording, yet the RE20 is a smoother one.

A microphone is about preference and which you like better. The Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 are comparable in quality, but they may not be for the same user. Aside from the sound character, the overall quality of these microphones is outstanding. Additionally, you will love the technology they put on these microphones, making them even more interesting to invest in.

Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 Design

Before checking what the Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 can offer, let’s look at the units first. The two look physically identical with the same design and the same accessories. The microphones are made of metal for both housing and grille. They look unique because the grille covers more than half of the microphone’s body, unlike many other microphones. The grill is at the top and goes down to the body, kind of reminding you of a shotgun.

Both microphones come in a hard case with a zipper lock. The hard case has foam inside to secure the mic, and they have the mount already installed. The mount is made of plastic, but it seems durable, so there is no build quality issue here. For features, you get a single switch on RE20 to activate the filter. On the inside, RE20 has thicker foam that wraps its capsule, affecting the dampening performance. There is no other accessory, and for the connector, both use XLR cable.

Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 Setup

Next is the setup, but like many other broadcasting microphones, the Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 are dynamic; thus, you don’t need phantom power. They use XLR cable, meaning we need to connect it to something before they go to your computer. An audio interface such as Scarlett Solo 3rd gen should be an adequate and straightforward setup. Unlike SM7B, these microphones are not as gain-hungry, but you will still need to drive the gain for about 80%, depending on the equipment.

Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 Specs

The specs for Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 are very similar as they are both cardioids. The frequency response is the same from 45Hz to 18kHz in the general setting. The RE320 has an interesting feature, or built-in EQ specifically made for kick drums, and it changes the frequency response from 30Hz to 18kHz. As for the sensitivity, the RE20 is approximate -56.5dB and -52dB for the RE320. The impedance of these mics is the same at 150 Ohms.

Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 Sound Characters

Now let’s see how the two sound different in practice. Upon listening to the mics, you can instantly tell that the RE320 is a brighter microphone that gives your voice more presence in the same setting. The RE320 is also more sensitive to plosives as we speak close to the capsule without any pop-up filter. It is a more-articulate mic than RE20, so we think female voice or spoken words will sound cleaner and more pronounced.

The RE320 is surprisingly a very pleasant mic for our voice but probably not for some people. The RE20, on the other hand, is more neutral and has a well-controlled upper end, which gives it a mellower voice and is ideal for people who dislike the high frequency of their voice.

Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 Features

Both Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 have a switch on the body, but they have different functions. For RE20, the switch is a high pass filter at -45db @400Hz-100Hz, while at RE320, it is a feature for kick drums and other purposes where you don’t want the mid-range. The kick-drum setting has a tight low-end extending to 30Hz and boosting from 100Hz to 150Hz. There seems to be a 4.5db low-mid dip around 380Hz. These settings affect how the mic captures and processes your sound, and the difference is noticeable.

With the kick-drum switch active, your voice will sound lack of mid, in general thinning, making it sounds a bit further away. As for the RE20, its filter is not helpful for most people because it removes the fullness of your voice, but if you have an intense deep voice, then it can be useful. Another feature the Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 have is Variable D, which is the mic’s design. This is more technology than a feature because Variable D aims to eliminate the proximity effect.

It is a great technology and implementation in a broadcasting mic because it will eliminate the proximity effect and give you more room to speak into the microphone without noticing an extreme difference in how they capture the sound.

Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 Performance

As for the performance, both Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 are great. They reject plosives effectively, but due to the nature of RE320, it may be more sensitive if you speak closer to the mic. A pop-up filter should be able to remove this issue. The off-axis rejection is also impressive on both microphones. The mount is solid, but it doesn’t pick up noise from the surface like a desk. But, you will notice the sound coming from the boom arm and when tapping into the capsule.

Electro-Voice RE20 Vs RE320

The Electro-Voice RE20 and RE320 are similar but different microphones. They are similarly good options and reliable, but they sound different and even have different internal components once you open the housing. The RE320 is brighter, more articulate for words, and can be harsher for some people’s voices. It pronounces your higher frequencies, so it is not ideal if you dislike the highs of your natural voice. The RE20 is more forgiving and more suitable for most people. It is also the overall smoother-sounding microphone.

- Professional quality dynamic cardioid microphone with studio condenser-like performance
- The classic sound of FM radio voices with smooth, natural, and controlled sonic character
- The Variable-D design and heavy-duty internal pop filter excel for close-in voice work, while an internal element shock-mount reduces vibration-induced noise
- Steel case and hum-bucking coil provide exceptional magnetic shielding and guards against line hum
- A professional-grade dynamic microphone designed specifically for recording and sound reinforcement
- Ideal for applications requiring extremely low noise and the best possible tonal and transient response
- Great for capturing a variety of vocal and instrument sources, and delivers terrific detail, dynamic response, and pleasing natural tone
- The Variable-D pattern control minimizes positional and off-axis tonal shifts

Conclusion

There is no wrong choice, and you will be happy with these mics’ qualities. We recommend RE20 because it is the safer option and seems to please the general users. It is also a smooth sounding and captures both the body and highs of your voice without noticeably boosting a specific frequency.