Lewitt LCT 640 Vs AKG C414 XLS Comparison

In the music industry, the microphone is one of the very important tools for live performance or recording. The reason why there should be a “way” to select it is because of the many different types and brands of microphone on the market that make us confused to choose which. Random bought microphone, though with it’s cheap though it is just a waste of money because the function obtained. Maybe two Microphone which we will review a little about each of them will be one of your preferred microphone for later use as one of the tools that support any of the industry that you are living. What are the types? There are Lewitt LCT 640 and AKG C414 XLS. Here, we will make versus here they are: Lewitt LCT 640 Vs AKG C414 XLS.

Lewitt LCT 640 Vs AKG C414 XLS

Lewit LCT 640
Lewitt LCT640 has a ribbon shape of microphone. It also has dual-diaphragm and one-inch capasitor capsule. There are five pattern of this mic such as omni, figure-of-eight and three widths of cardioid. The dynamic range is 145dB with a creditably low self-noise specification of 10 to 13 dB EIN. The Sensitivity is quoted as 13mV/Pa in cardioid mode, falling to 9mV/Pa in the figure-of-eight setting. The mainly frequencies above 5kHz and the output is on a three-pin XLR with gold-plated pins, and standard 48V phantom power is required for operation. The latter introduces either 0dB, 6dB, 12dB or 18dB of pre-attenuation, while the low-cut filter can impose a 12dB/octave roll-off at 40Hz, or gentler 6dB/octave cuts at 150Hz or 300Hz.

Technical Specs

Lewitt LCT 640AKG C414 XLS
- Frequency range : 20 - 20.000Hz- Audio Frequency bandwidth 20 to 20000 Hz
- Sensitivity : 13 mV / Pa (-38 dBV- Sensitivity 23 mV/Pa
- Equivalent noise level : 10 dB-A- Equivalent Noise Level 6 dB-A
- Signal / noise ratio : 84dB-A- Signal to Noise 88 dB-A

AKG C414 XLS
The AKG C414 XLS is a multipattern condenser microphone with nine polar patterns for the perfect sonic capture for every application. The AKG C414 XLS is featured with Omni, wide cardioid, cardioid, hypercardioid, figure eight, and four intermediate pickup patterns, Engineered for highest linearity and neutral sound for beautifully detailed recording of vocals and any acoustic instrument, Nine selectable polar patterns for the perfect setting for every application, Three attenuation levels (-6,-12,-18dB) for close-up recording or high-output sources of up to 158dB SPL, Three different switchable bass-cut filters, and overload warning with audio peak hold LED to detect shortest audio peaks.

Lewitt LCT 640 Vs AKG C414 XLS

- Superior transient response from ultra-thin externally biased, gold-layered low-mass diaphragms for ear-catching realism and authentic sound
- 5 directional characteristics for maximum flexibility in a wide variety of recording applications
- 10 dB self-noise and max SPL of 145 dB for a total dynamic range of 135 dB, providing maximum acoustic presence and clarity
- 4-position switchable pre-attenuation pad (0 dB, 6 dB, 12 dB and 18 dB) for handling extremely high sound pressure levels and 4-position high-pass filter
- Flat frequency response for natural, authentic sound
- Engineered for highest linearity and neutral sound for beautifully detailed recording of vocals and any acoustic instrument
- Nine selectable polar patterns for the perfect setting for every application
- Three attenuation levels (-6/-12/-18dB) for close-up recording or high-output sources of up to 158dB SPL
- Three different switchable bass-cut filters to reduce wind noise, subsonic noise or proximity effect
- Overload warning with audio peak hold LED to detect shortest audio peaks

Conclusion
Finally we arrive at the conclusion of Lewitt LCT 640 vs AKG C414 XLS comparison and battle review. We think that you will love AKG C414 XLS better thatn Lewitt LCT 640 to death but, in case if you want to stretch your budget as far as it can go and especially for a Chinese made microphone, You should pick a Lewitt LCT 640 blows anything else out of the water for quality as your choice. Enjoy your Microphone!

Leave a Reply