Neumann KMS 105 Vs Shure SM7B

The ultra-famous Neumann KMS 105 Vs Shure SM7B are excellent options to upgrade your studio setup. These microphones sound fantastic and are ideal for various applications. The two offer pleasing and natural sounds for podcasting, singing, and instruments. However, they are not identical and before deciding on the option, let’s see below what to expect.

In this comparison, we are going to talk about:

  • What to Look for in a Microphone
  • What are Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B
  • How are the Build Qualities of Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B
  • How are the Specs of Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B
  • How is the Setup  for Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B
  • How are the Sound Characters of Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B
  • How is the Performance of Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B
  • What else Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B can offer
  • Neumann KMS 105 Vs Shure SM7B

Selecting a Microphone

Selecting the microphone is probably the most challenging part when building a setup. The microphone is a crucial point that will decide how your sound is captured. While every microphone can do the same job, they will do it differently. It is convenient to go with the trend because chances are they will become a great product, but it is best to put some time and consider what you need. The microphone will last for a long time, so we should go for the best model for our budget and application.

For those who recently started building the setup, we can consider the type of microphone to use. Condenser and dynamic microphones are equally suitable for studio applications. But, the dynamic type is often more rugged and able to withstand very loud sounds that will benefit live applications. The condenser one usually has a better frequency response and can capture the voice’s nuance, which is excellent for vocals and in a treated room. The polar pattern affects the mic’s directionality and how it captures your sound.

Microphones with the narrowest polar pattern will reduce the chance of picking up more noise from the off-axis. The hyper or ultra-cardioid options are best when you want to focus on a single sound source. Modern microphones come with plenty of features, and you can benefit from them. One of the most convenient technologies is USB microphones, such as Elgato Wave 3 Vs Blue Yeti, which are famous for broadcasting purposes. This type of microphone is excellent if you need the most straightforward setup possible.

 Neumann KMS 105Shure SM7B
Product Dimensions8.1 x 3.5 x 3.3 inches
13.3 x 7.2 x 4.8 inches
Shipping Weight1 pounds 2.03 pounds
Shop now at Amazonclick hereclick here

About Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B

There are many good microphones, and it is possible to like different models for different applications if you often work with audio. For example, we can use a warm and full-sounding microphone for broadcasting and a brighter condenser for singing. You can find instrument microphones to mic the kick drums or guitar and bass amps. Good microphones don’t have to be expensive, but they have to sound good and reliable while relatively easy to use.

Additionally, what’s good for others is not always performing the same because we have different applications and setups, such as between Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B. Both microphones are undeniably famous for their respective purpose, and almost everyone knows these models that give your voice a lovely character. They are high-end and mid-range microphones that will be great for different purposes and users. One is a handheld condenser microphone, and the latter is a dynamic broadcasting model.

You can mount Neumann KMS 105 on a mic stand and have it in a broadcasting setup. But, it is challenging to use SM7B on live performance because the shape of the mic is not ideal for the application. The KMS 105 also costs almost twice the SM7B, so the type of user who buys this microphone is usually professional. Another difference between Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B is their sound character because one is best for singing, and the latter is best for spoken words.

Of course, you can use both for different recording applications, too, but the sound character matches well with the respective purposes. We think the natural, bright, and smooth top quality of KMS 105 will help vocalists deliver their best performance. On the other hand, SM7B is one of the safest choices for broadcasters and most people who record their speaking voice as it has warm, full, and smooth character without being overly boomy or thick on the low end.

Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B Build Quality

One of the main differences between Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B is their styling. The KMS 105 is a handheld model, and it is for live application. The unit is small and great on the hand, even if you have small hands. The construction is all metal, and there is no feature on the unit to minimize distraction and chances of accidentally activating something. The grille cap is removable, and it seems there is a filter inside that will help with the plosives rejection.

The package comes with a Velcro pouch with smaller pockets inside to store the microphone and mount. The SM7B is bigger than KMS 105, and Shure attaches the mic to its mount so you can directly install it on a stand. The build quality is also impressive with all-metal construction. The grille of SM7B is like a perforated dome with a foam cover. The mount is adjustable for better positioning, and the mic includes another thicker foam filter to improve plosives rejection.

Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B Specs

Next, let’s see what the Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B can offer, starting with general specs. The main difference between both microphones is construction, as one is a condenser and the latter is a dynamic microphone. The polar pattern of KMS 105 is super-cardioid, which is awesome to avoid picking up unwanted sounds from the surroundings. The frequency response is standard 20Hz to 20kHz, the sensitivity of -47dB, maximum SPL of 150dB, self-noise of 66dBA, and impedance of 50 Ohms.

The Shure SM7B is also not far different, but this microphone has a cardioid polar pattern, which naturally has a wider capturing area. The frequency response is 50Hz to 20kHz, sensitivity or approximately -59dB, impedance of 150 Ohms or 300 Ohms, self-noise around 22dB, and maximum SPL of 180dB.

Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B Setup

Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B setups are similar because you need to hook them into something. Supposed you will use these mics in a studio or recording setup, we will need an audio interface or a recorder. The KMS 105 requires phantom power and the SM7B requires a clean gain of around 60dB to drive the mic properly. The most audio interface will do a great job at powering and converting the signal, or you can also add a cloud lifter for SM7B if the interface has a lower gain range.

Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B Sound Characters

Now is for the vital part of the sound character of these microphones. In general, both Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B have a relatively flat frequency response. They can maintain a natural effect that will please most ears. But, they don’t sound identical, and the first thing we noticed is the KMS 105 is brighter and livelier than SM7B. You can hear more of your voice, the enthusiast, from the speakers, but it surprisingly maintains a very smooth top that doesn’t sound harsh.

The KMS 105 is a beautiful-sounding microphone for spoken words and singing. Speaking closely to the mic is fantastic, but you may notice that its low end starts to get much thinner when you bring it further from the mouth. On the other hand, SM7B is a full-sounding microphone, and this model has a more noticeable low end than KMS 105, which is not strange as it is a broadcasting model. The upper frequency is still smooth, but it lacks sparkles for singing.

However, we love the comfortable low-end, and flat mid-range because this type of character suits broadcasting or spoken words the most. The SM7B is also versatile if you need it to record a demo, and while it doesn’t sound impressive for instruments like guitar, we think it is still very usable.

Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B Performance 

Both Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B are easy to use in the performance. The best thing is their plosives rejection, which is excellent, especially for KMS 105, as the design looks like a typical handheld mic. The SM7B also works impressively for rejecting plosives, and we can change the foam filter to help eliminate some of the high ends. But, the KMS 105 is not the best in handling noise, so it is probably best to put the mic on a mount rather than holding it while singing.

Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B Features

Lastly, we want to mention the features in these microphones or SM7B because there is no switch on the KMS 105. The capsule of SM7B is clean of any buttons or switches, but you can find some at the bottom. Shure also provides a base cover to close this part and prevent accidental activation. The switch is deep, so it can be difficult to access unless you use something like nails. One control is for a low cut to eliminate the low frequency, and the other is a mid boost.

Neumann KMS 105 Vs Shure SM7B

Both Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM7B are good microphones and ideal for many types of users. The main difference is that KMS 105 is a handheld model while the SM7B is a studio microphone, making KMS 105 more versatile. The sound character is also different with KMS 105 has a flatter low end and brighter high frequency to give sparks and liveliness to your voice. The SM7B is warm and has plenty of low-end, yet it is not boomy and still useful for singing.

- Neumann sound on stage
- Highly detailed condenser mic for demanding on stage applications
- Robust metal housing reduces handling noise
- Includes stand mount and padded nylon bag
- ONE MICROPHONE FOR EVERYTHING - Studio Recording, Home Recording, Podcasting and Streaming. The SM7B Is Trusted By The Worlds Leading Vocalists, Podcasters and Streamers.
- STUDIO VOCAL RECORDING - The SM7B’s Dynamic Cartridge With Smooth, Flat, Wide-range Frequency Response Produces Exceptionally Clean and Natural Reproduction Of Both Music and Speech.
- PODCAST and BROADCAST - Found In The Top Podcasting Studios Around The World, The SM7B Air Suspension Shock Isolation and Pop Filter Eliminate Both Mechanical Noise And Breathiness. So Words Get Through And The Rest Stays Out Of The Mix.
- STREAMING CONTENT - Professional Live Streaming Starts With A Microphone Capable Of Capturing Exceptionally Clean And Natural Reproduction Of Both Music And Speech. The SM7B Has Been A Pioneer In Such Abilities For Decades.

Conclusion 

The decision is yours and which seems to fit in your application or preference the most. We recommend KMS 105 if you will be singing a lot with the mic because it is fantastic for vocals. But, if you only need a broadcasting mic, we can save a lot with SM7B because it is also an excellent sounding microphone, especially for spoken words.