Neumann U67 Vs U87 Comparison

Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 come from the same family of condenser microphones. They may look quite similar, and they indeed share a number of similar features such as the switchable polar pattern, pre-attenuation pad, and high-pass filter. So, which one is better? Despite the similarities, there are a few distinctive features between Neumann U67 vs U87 that may make one of them more suitable for you than the other.

Neumann U67 Vs U87

The Similar Features
First of all, let’s see how these two condenser microphones are similar to each other. They each have three switchable polar patterns, which are cardioid, omnidirectional, and figure-eight. The cardioid polar pattern captures sound signals from the front while rejecting other signals from the sides and rear, so it is suitable for vocals. The omnidirectional polar pattern captures sound signals from all directions equally, and is great for some instruments and recording ambience.

Finally, the figure-eight polar pattern captures from the front and rear, and is handy for recording two voices at the same time, recording a singing instrumentalist, and recording in stereo. With these polar patterns, both Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 can be very versatile and useful in various recording situations. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs U87!

They each also have a 10dB pre-attenuation pad, which is handy for handling a loud singer or instrument, and a high-pass filter which can attenuate LF noise such as handling noise and wind. Again, these switchable features make these mics very versatile and handy for different recording needs and conditions.

Technical Specs

Neumann U67Neumann U87
- Microphone Type : Condenser- Microphone Type : Condenser
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8
- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHzResponse : 30Hz-18kHz
- Max SPL : 105dB (Cardioid), 110dB (Omni), 111dB (Figure-8)- Max SPL : 117dB (Cardioid) (127dB w/10dB Pre-attenuation)
- Output Impedance : 50 ohms- Output Impedance : 200 ohms
- Signal to Noise Ratio : 83dB (Cardioid), 78dB (Omni), 77dB (Figure-8)- Signal to Noise Ratio : 82dB (Cardioid); 79dB (Omni), 80dB (Figure-8)
- Self Noise : 11dB (Cardioid), 16dB (Omni), 17dB (Figure-8)- Self Noise : 12dB (Cardioid), 15dB (Omni), 14dB (Figure-8)

Frequency Response Range
The first difference between Neumann U67 vs U87 is the frequency response range. Neumann U67 has a shorter frequency response range of 40 Hz – 16 kHz. As the effect, it does not have much headroom, and it does not reach deep down for the bass. However, the sound quality is exceptional. It has a very natural sound. It works extremely well as a drum overhead, and is great for a simple drum set-up in a good room.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 comes with a longer frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. It can capture higher and lower notes. However, the sound tends to be bright. It is great for vocals, as it can help to boost the presence of the voice. It is suitable for singers with deep voices and rappers.

Maximum SPL Handling
The next difference between Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 is the maximum SPL handling. Neumann U67 has a lower maximum SPL handling, which is 116 dB. On the other hand, Neumann U87 has a slightly higher maximum SPL handling, which is 117 dB. With the pre-attenuation pad turned on, it increases to 127 dB. So, Neumann U87 is slightly better in handling loud voices.

Neumann U67 Vs U87

- The Neumann TLM 67 is a large-diaphragm condenser microphone in the classic Neumann style
- 3 selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-810dB attenuation switch127dB SPL handling 20Hz to 20kHz response Impedance rated at 200 ohms.

Conclusion
In the end, choosing between these two mics depends on your need. If you prefer a natural-sounding mic that is suitable for both vocals and instruments, Neumann U67 is the way to go. It is relatively more versatile. On the other hand, Neumann U87 is great if you need a bright mic for singers with deep voices or rappers.

Leave a Reply