Razer Seiren Vs Blue Yeti Comparison

Are you in a disquiet because you are unable to choose between Razer Seiren and Blue Yeti? Both products are heavily popular USB microphones available on the market. In general, the two are considered to be from the same price range, as you can get either of them with a budget under two hundred bucks, but you may want to know that Razer Serien is usually a little bit pricier than Blue Yeti. Both Razer Seiren and Blue Yeti are considered high-quality, suitable for a variety of purposes, from mobile recording to game streaming. So, how do they actually compare to each other? Which is the one that you should choose? Let’s see the comparisons!

razer-seiren-vs-blue-yeti

Design and Feature
Quite interestingly, both models come with some similar design and features. Both mics, of course, connect to a computer device via USB. Both are plug-and-play devices, which means that the two can work with your computer right away without needing you to configure any confusing driver software. Each also has a zero-latency headphone output jack for direct monitoring, which is important if you want to have the utmost control and precision over the recording. (See also: Razer Seiren Vs Razer Seiren Pro)

Technical Specs

Razer SeirenBlue Yeti
- Power required / consumption: 5V 500mA (USB) - Power Required/Consumption: 5V 150mA
- Sample rate: 192kHz- Sample Rate: 48 kHz
- Bit rate: 24bit - Bit Rate: 16-bit
- Capsules: Three 14mm condenser capsules - Capsules: 3 Blue-proprietary 14mm condenser capsules
- Polar patterns: Cardioid, stereo, omnidirectional, bidirectional - Polar Patterns: Cardioid, Bidirectional, Omnidirectional, Stereo
- Frequency response: 20Hz – 20kHz - Frequency Response: 20Hz - 20kHz

Both Razer Seiren and Blue Yeti feature multiple polar patterns. They both can be configured to be cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, or stereo, making these mics very flexible and versatile for various purposes and conditions. The internal components are also similar, as they each is powered by three 14 mm condenser capsules to do the job.

Razer Seiren comes with dedicated headphone volume control and mic gain control, allowing you to adjust the volume level of your monitoring without altering the actual input level. In addition, there is the Razer Synapse app, through which you can furtherly adjust and customize the mic. On the other hand, Blue Yeti also features a gain control, but has no dedicated headphone volume control. Instead, it features a mute button, which can be very handy for starting and stopping your recording.

Performance and Output Quality
Even though there are quite some similarities between the two products, they are quite different in terms of performance and output quality. Multiple tests have shown that Razer Seiren has better sensitivity and tonal accuracy than Blue Yeti. They both have a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, also a maximum SPL handling of 120 dB with 0.5% THD at 1 kHz. However, compared to Blue Yeti, Razer Seiren captures fuller, more accurate, and more detailed sounds. Lows are defined more properly, while the mids and highs are crisp and clear.

In addition, Razer Seiren also records in a better quality than Blue Yeti. Whereas Blue Yeti records in the standard 16-bit/48kHz, Razer Seiren offers an improved recording quality with the 24-bit/192kHz maximum resolution. With the better bit rate and higher sample rate, of course, Razer Seiren produces more superior digital audio files, with more accuracy and subtle details.

Razer Seiren Vs Blue Yeti

- HD recording with outstanding clarity
- 4 adjustable recording patterns (Cardioid, Stereo, Omni, Bi-directional)
- Quick controls for pattern switching, headphone volume and mic gain
- Built-in headphone amplifier with zero latency output
- Plug and play recording via single USB connection
- Tri-capsule array - 3 condenser capsules can record almost any situation
- Multiple pattern selection - cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional & stereo
- Gain control, mute button, zero-latency headphone output
- Perfect for vocals, musical instruments, podcasting, voiceovers, interviews, field recordings, conference calls
- Plug 'n play - Mac OS X (10.4.11 or higher) and PC (Windows 8.1, 8, 7, Vista, XP)

Conclusion
All in all, Razer Seiren makes the best way to go. The primary reason, of course, the better audio quality. The controllability it offers is also excellent, while the Razer Synapse app becomes a nice plus point.

Rode NTK Vs Neumann TLM 102 Comparison

If you are looking for a truly top-notch condenser microphone that you can rely on for crystal-clear quality vocal recording, you make no mistake by considering to get either Rode NTK or Neumann TLM 102. Both of them are available in a similar price range, though Neumann TLM 102 is usually a little bit pricier than Rode NTK. Each of the two products has received quite a lot of positive reviews from the users, praised for the superior performance and output quality. So, now, between Rode NTK and Neumann TLM 102, which is the one that you should choose?

rode-ntk-vs-neumann-tlm-102

Design
Both Rode NTK and Neumann TLM 102 have a cardioid polar pattern. They pick up sounds the best from the front and slightly from the sides due to the rather wide pick-up angle, while attenuating the rear. One thing that can be worth a note, even though Rode NTK and Neumann TLM 102 are both condenser microphones, the two feature slightly different internal designs. Whereas Neumann TLM 102 is a condenser microphone with a pressure gradient transducer, Rode NTK is a tube condenser microphone. Having an internal tube impedance converter system, Rode NTK becomes quite bulkier and heavier than Neumann TLM 102. Rode NTK, measuring 55 mm x 55 mm x 208 mm, is rather long. With a mass of 760 grams, the mic is also quite heavy. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 102 is relatively more compact and lightweight, with a diameter of 52 mm and length of 116 mm. The mass is barely 210 grams. When it comes to handling and ease of placement, Neumann TLM 102 has the better edge here than Rode NTK.

Technical Specs

Rode NTKNeumann TLM 102
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency range: 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Sensitivity: -38.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kΩ 11 mV/Pa
- Output Impedance 200Ω- Rated impedance 50 Ω - Rated load impedance 1 kΩ
- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) 12dB-A- Equivalent noise level, A-weighted 12 dB-A
- Maximum SPL 158dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)- Maximum SPL for THD 0.5% 144 dB
- Maximum Output Level 29.0mV- Maximum output voltage 13 dBu
- Weight 760.00gm- Weight Approx. 210 g
- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient- Acoustical operating principle Pressure gradient transducer

Output Quality
As we have mentioned before, Rode NTK is a tube condenser mic, while Neumann TLM 102 is a condenser mic with a pressure gradient transducer. For sure, they deliver different output characteristics.

Rode NTK, like most other tube condenser mics, breathes some warmth into the audio reproduction. This is great if you want to somewhat smoothen the vocal. The mic has a very low noise level and a wide dynamic range. It can capture lows, mids, and highs very well, with satisfying accuracy and cleanliness.

On the other hand, Neumann TLM 102 sounds more natural. It reproduces the original tones more accurately. The audio reproduction is bright, crisp, and clear. When you want to have the utmost sonic accuracy and retain the original color of the vocal, Neumann TLM 102 is the weapon to choose. Neumann TLM 102 also has a similarly very low noise level, only the maximum SPL that is slightly lower than Rode NTK’s.

Rode NTK Vs Neumann TLM 102

- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Class A valve circuitry
- Wide dynamic range
- Hand-selected and graded 6922 twin-triode valve
- Large-diaphragm microphone with cardioid directional characteristic (pressure gradient transducer)
- Compact Neumann design
- Very high maximum sound pressure level (144 dB)
- Slight presence boost above 6 kHz helps vocals to shine in the mix

Conclusion
In general, Neumann TLM 102 makes the best way to go. The natural output quality makes it flexible and versatile for different vocal types. If you want to have warmer sounds, you can simply pair it with a tube preamp. On the other hand, Rode NTK is also great, and is a viable choice if you want to have a tube condenser mic instead.

Shure MV88 Vs Rode iXY Comparison

If you are looking for a decent and reliable stereo condenser microphone to work with your iOS device, look no more! Shure MV88 and Rode iXY are among the best choices available on the market! Both are heavily popular products on the market. People love Shure MV88’s simple and straightforward design, also superbly rugged and durable construction. On the other hand, Rode iXY is small, compact, and portable. Available at a very affordable and budget-friendly price point, it is considered as a huge value for the money. Which is the one that you should get?

Shure MV88 Vs Rode iXY

Design
In terms of design, Shure MV88 and Rode iXY are certainly very different from each other. From the looks alone, Shure MV88 looks like a single-piece hardware so that you may mistake Shure MV88 as a regular mono mic. But, in fact, Shure MV88 is a stereo mic. It utilizes paired built-in cardioid and bidirectional 1cm cartridges, configured in a mid-side architecture to capture the best-in-class audio in a clear and phase-perfect stereo image. Shure MV88 features an all-metal construction for the best durability, ready for all kinds of heavy-duty usage. The mic is attached to a unique 90-degree rotatable hinge that allows you to record in various positions.

Technical Specs

Shure MV88Rode iXY
- Cardioid (1 cm) / Bidirectional Condenser Cartridge (1 cm)- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient
- Recording Quality : Up to 24bit / 48 kHz- Record stereo audio at 24-bit, 96kHz*
- Frequency Response: 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Adjustable Gain Range : 0 to +36 dB- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted): 18dB-A
- Sensitivity: -37 dBFS / Pa at 1 kHz- Sensitivity: -42.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (8.52mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz
- Maximum SPL: 120 dB SPL- Maximum SPL: 120dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)
- Power Requirements: Powered Through Lightning Connector- Connector: 30-Pin
- Polar Pattern: Adjustable Width Stereo / Mono Bidirectional / Mono Cardioid / Mid-Side- Polar Pattern: Paired cardioid capsules in X-Y stereo pattern

On the other hand, Rode iXY, as the name suggests, features an X/Y configuration, utilizing a pair of condenser microphones aligned in such a way to capture the desired stereo image. Rode iXY also comes with a metal casing for maximum protection.

Mid-side and X/Y have each own distinctions. Mid-side breathes a significant clarity to the center of a stereo recording, emphasizing the center more. Mid-side is great for speaks and dialogues, also for capturing a wider spread of instruments. Mid-side also actually records sounds in different signals, mid and side, allowing you to adjust and customize each signal separately, as well as to create a mono track if you only use the mid signal. On the other hand, X/Y is useful when you want to de-emphasize the center of the stereo field. X/Y record into a single stereo recording that can be manipulated in many ways, but not to the precision level that mid-side has.

Recording Quality
Both models record with satisfying quality. They both capture lows, mids, and highs very well. Each has a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. However, Rode iXY has a slightly higher sensitivity than Shure MV88, allowing you to capture subtle details more properly. Also, both record in 24-bit, but Shure MV88’s sample rate is 48kHz while Rode iXY’s sample rate is 96kHz.

Feature
Shure MV88 is Apple Mfi-certified, able to connect to any iOS device equipped with a Lightning connector. It comes with 5 DSP preset modes (instrument, acoustic, singing, speech, loud, and flat) that are handy when you don’t have enough time to do the settings manually. It can automatically adjust the EQ, compression, and limit for optimum results. It is compatible with the free Shure Plus MOTIV Recoding app.

On the other hand, Rode iXY connects to your iOS device using the 30-pin connector. Another variant, Rode iXY-L, comes with the Lightning connector instead. There is RODE Rec app that functions to help you control your recording, as well as to activate the software-switchable 72Hz high-pass filter.

Shure MV88 Vs Rode iXY

- Provides superior audio quality and clarity
- Apple MFi certified compatible with all iOS devices equipped with a Lightning connector
- Matched cardioid and bi-directional 1 cm cartridges for best-in-class audio
- Mid-side architecture for a phase-perfect, clear stereo image
- 5 DSP preset modes (Speech, Singing, Flat, Acoustic Instrument, Loud)
- Compatible with iPhone 4S, iPhone 4, iPad (3rd gen.), iPad 2 and iPad
- Built-in high pass filter to minimize handling noise (switchable within Rode Rec app)
- True XY stereo pattern mics for remarkable stereo recordings
- Comes with foam windshield for outdoor recording as well as a reinforced zip case
- Available Rode Rec app designed specifically to work with the iXY and give 24bit/96kHz recording

Conclusion
All in all, if you prefer mid-side, which has superior controllability, you should choose Shure MV88. If you prefer X/Y, you should choose Rode iXY. If you are fine with either, you may prefer Rode iXY due to the higher sample rate and high-pass filter.
Attachments area

Sennheiser e935 Vs e945 Comparison

If you need a mic that is very versatile and well-suited for any purpose, consider having a dynamic microphone. Dynamic microphones tend to have a simple design with only a few moving parts. Hence, they are better suited than other types of mics for handling high volume levels, like from some instruments and amplifiers. They are also generally sturdy and resilient to rough handling. Now, if you have made your mind about getting a dynamic microphone, you may come across Sennheiser e935 and Sennheiser e945. Manufactured by the same worldwide-known company, Sennheiser, both e935 and e945 are quite popular on the market. However, e945 is a little bit more expensive than e935. So, what are the differences between the two models? Which is the one best for you?

Sennheiser E935 Vs E945

Design
Putting the two models side by side, you can hardly tell any difference besides the written name on the body. Both Sennheiser e935 and Sennheiser e945 feature a metal construction for maximum ruggedness and reliability. They can certainly endure through heavy duties and the abuse of travel. Both are armed with a neodymium ferrous magnet with boron that keeps the power and performance of the mic stable despite extreme and unideal climate conditions. Each of them features a shock-mounted capsule with a humbucking coil that keeps the internal components healthy regardless of high and fluctuating input levels. (Let us also see: Sennheiser E835 Vs E935)

Technical Specs

Sennheiser e935Sennheiser e945
-Frequency response (microphone) 40 - 18000 Hz - Frequency response (microphone) 40 - 18000 Hz
-1 MZQ 800 microphone clip- 1 MZQ 800 microphone clip
- Sensitivity in free field, no load (1kHz) 2,8mV/Pa = -51dB (0 dB = 1V/Pa) = -71 dB (0 dB = 1V/ubar) - Sensitivity in free field, no load (1kHz) 2,0mV/Pa = -54dB (0 dB = 1V/Pa) = -74 dB (0 dB = 1V/ubar)
- Nominal impedance 350 Ω- Nominal impedance 350 Ω
- Min. terminating impedance 1000 Ω - Min. terminating impedance 1000 Ω

However, one crucial difference between Sennheiser e935 and Sennheiser e945 is the polar pattern. Sennheiser e935 is a cardioid mic, whereas Sennheiser e945 has a supercardioid polar pattern.

So, how do cardioid and supercardioid differ? A cardioid polar pattern picks up sounds from the front part of the mic. It captures sounds coming from the front and slightly the sides, while attenuating the rear. As the effect, it can tolerate the user going slightly off-axis, but is also more susceptible to feedbacks. On the other hand, a supercardioid polar pattern has a more restricted capturing angle. Supercardioid picks up sounds directly from the front and attenuates the sides more. Hence, supercardioid is less tolerant if the user goes off-axis. However, supercardioid captures sound with better accuracy and precision. The sounds are cleaner and more defined, as the mic doesn’t capture as much background noise. Supercardioid is also more resistant to feedback.

Performance and Sound Quality
Both Sennheiser e935 and Sennheiser e945 have the same frequency response range of 40 Hz – 18 kHz. In general, they capture lows, mids, and highs very well. However, comparing the two to each other, e945 has slightly lower sensitivity than e935. Sennheiser e945 breathes some warmth and lively fullness to the audio reproduction, whereas Sennheiser e935 is crisper and somewhat brighter.

Sennheiser e935 Vs e945

- Made for the working musician
- Shock mounted capsule with humbucking coil
- Metal construction
- Cardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- Made in Germany
- Metal construction: Rugged and reliable
- 10 Year warranty
- Supercardioid lead vocal mic
- Produces a naturally smoothresponse
- Includes protective pouch and mic clip
- Metal construction: Rugged and reliable
- Shock-mounted capsule: Low sensitivity to impact and handling noise
- Supercardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- 10 Year warranty

Conclusion
Sennheiser e945 can indeed deliver better audio quality for vocals, but only if the user has a decent technique in order to keep on-axis. In such case. Sennheiser e945 delivers fantastic results. However, for general purpose, Sennheiser e935 is more suitable. It is more tolerant to off-axis sounds. This is useful especially if the user actively moves, which is the case in live on-stage performances and for vocalists who play an instrument simultaneously.

Samson Go Mic Vs Blue Snowball Comparison

Are you looking for a truly decent and reliable USB condenser microphone? Such equipment is crucial if you are a very busy and mobile person, and your job requires a mic that can be brought along throughout the day. For such case, Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball are two feasible choices. Both products are heavily popular on the market, each boasting lots of positive reviews from the users. In a prior article, we have ever compared Samson Go Mic to the sibling of Blue Snowball, Blue Yeti, as well. Since Blue Yeti is also a USB condenser mic, don’t forget to take a look at the article as well!

Samson Go Mic Vs Blue Snowball

Design
For sure, both Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball are very compact, lightweight, and portable. Even so, of course, they are designed quite differently and distinctively. Samson Go Mic is rectangular-shaped and is slim enough to allow you to easily slip it into your pocket or any spare space available in your pocket. It comes with a clip stand that allows you to clip it to a laptop or stand comfortably on a desk.

On the other hand, Blue Snowball, as the name suggests, is shaped like a ball. Thus, it is perhaps quite bulky and not convenient to be put in your pocket. It comes with a detachable foot stand. The foot stand is also foldable for easy and convenient storage and travel.

Technical Specs

Samson Go MicBlue Snowball
-Type: Condenser Microphone- Transducer Type: Condenser, Pressure Gradient With USB digital output
-Frequency Response 20 - 18000 Hz- Frequency Response: 40 –18 kHz
- 16-bit, 44.1kHz resolution- Sample/word Rate: 44.1 kHz/16 bit
- Item Weight: 8 ounces- Item Weight: 1.8 pounds
- Product Dimensions 6 x 1 x 5 inches- Product Dimensions 10.6 x 9.1 x 5.5 inches

Feature
Both models offer multiple polar patterns. Samson Go Mic can be set cardioid or omnidirectional, depending on the task at hand. A cardioid polar pattern will focus capturing sounds coming from the front, while slightly attenuating the sides and significantly attenuating the rear. An omnidirectional polar pattern picks up sounds from all angles. On the other hand, Blue Snowball also has both cardioid mode and omnidirectional mode, but there is a switchable -10dB pre-attenuation pad in the cardioid mode, allowing you to capture loud sounds with more fidelity. Both Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball are USB-powered. They consume power directly via the USB connection, so they have no battery to recharge.

Sound Quality
Both Samson Go Mic and Blue Snowball both record in 16-bit/44.1-kHz resolution. Even though a lot of people initially thought that Blue Snowball has better audio quality due to the slightly higher price, this is not always the case. Putting the two models to real tests, Samson Go Mic has proven to deliver better sounds than Blue Snowball. The sounds are clearer, more accurate, more articulate. Apparently, the issue with Blue Snowball is due to the shorter frequency response range. Blue Snowball only has a frequency response range of 40 Hz – 18 kHz. The bass seems to slightly muddle the mids and highs. On the other hand, Samson Go Mic has a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 18 kHz. The bass is more solid and does not get muddled with mids and highs as much.

Samson Go Mic vs Blue Snowball

- Portable USB condenser microphone
- Plug and Play Mac and PC compatible, no drivers required
- Custom compact design that clips to a laptop or sits on a desk
- Perfect for recording music, podcasting and field recording
- Ideal for voice recognition software, iChat, VoIP and web casting
- Custom condenser capsule offers crystal clear audio for Skype, Messages and FaceTime
- Record vocals, create podcasts, and add narration to your home movies
- Add crystal clear audio to recordings for YouTube
- Easy plug and play directly to your Mac or PC-no drivers to install
- Ships with desktop stand and USB cable

Conclusion
Even though Blue Snowball has a -10dB pre-attenuation pad, the other aspects are not as good as Samson Go Mic. For the most convenient design and the best recording quality, Samson Go Mic is the way to go.

AKG C214 Vs Rode NT1A Comparison

If you are looking for a decent and reliable condenser microphone that does not break the bank, both AKG and Rode would like to offer you their popular condenser models, AKG C214 and Rode NT1A. These are affordable condenser mic models that are very famous on the market, loved by many because of their superior performance. While AKG C214 is modeled after the top-class AKG C414 XLII, Rode NT1A is a special release that marks the anniversary of the company. How do the two compare to each other? Which one should you get?

AKG C214 Vs Rode NT1A

Design
Rode NT1A is cylindrical in shape. Compared to AKG C214, it is certainly slimmer, but also taller and slightly heavier. Nevertheless, it can be held comfortably in one hand, or mounted properly on a stand. It is off-white and silverish in color. On the other hand, AKG C214 is quite identical to AKG C414 in appearance. The frame is black while the grille is light brown, almost golden. AKG C214 is rather bulky to the sides, but also slightly lighter than Rode NT1A.

Both models are condenser microphones. Rode NT1A is a true condenser mic, externally biased, featuring a large 1” capsule with a gold-plated diaphragm. It has a cardioid polar pattern, which means that it captures sounds the best from the front while attenuating sounds coming from the rear. Meanwhile, AKG C214 features an extremely rugged and durable construction of all-metal die-cast with shock and scratch-resistant finish. AKG C214 features an integrated suspension that reduces mechanical noise and vibration. AKG C214 is also cardioid.

Technical Specs

AKG C214Rode NT1A
- Audio Frequency bandwidth 20 to 20000 Hz- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz
-Sensitivity 20 mV/Pa- Sensitivity: -31.9dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB
- Signal to Noise 81 dB-A- Self noise of only 5dB (A)
- Polar Pattern cardioid- Cardioid polar pattern
- Electrical Impedance 200 Ohms- Output Impedance: 100Ω
- Voltage 9 to 52 V- Maximum SPL: 137dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)
- Current 2 mA- Maximum Output Level: 13.7mV
- Preattunation Pad -20 dB- Capsule: 1.00"

Feature
One cool thing about Rode NT1A is that it boasts an extremely ultra-low self-noise level, which is barely 5 dB (A). As the effect, it is an extremely quiet mic. It can capture any vocal with superb cleanliness. AKG C214’s equivalent self-noise is actually quite low, only 13 dB-A, which is also certainly sufficient to deliver such a clear high-quality recording, but Rode NT1A is better in this aspect.

As a special product, there is no surprise that the company has decided to include Rode NT1A along with a list of accessories. The bundle includes the Rode SM6 shock mount, a pop filter, and a dust cover.

On the other hand, AKG C214 offers a flexible and versatile usage by featuring a switchable attenuator and bass-cut filter. The attenuator is able to lower the incoming signal levels by 20dB, effectively increasing the maximum input level tolerance of the mic. Meanwhile, the bass-cut filter can attenuate sounds lower than 160 Hz, reducing low-frequency noise such as breath and wind sounds and mechanical vibrations.

Both models have a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, which means that they can basically capture similar frequencies. Both are praised for the excellent audio reproduction quality, providing a degree of warmth and brightness, as well as delivering very good clarity. However, Rode NT1A comes with a lower impedance and higher sensitivity, making it able to capture subtle details somewhat more easily. Anyway, would prefer between Rode NT1A Vs NT2A?

AKG C214 Vs Rode NT1A

- Switchable 20dB attenuator and bass-cut filter for close-up recording and reduction of proximity effect
- Integrated suspension to reduce mechanical noise and vibration from stage
- Roadworthy design all-metal die-cast body with shock- and scratch-resistant finish
- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry
- Wide dynamic range

Conclusion
All in all, AKG C214 makes a great way to go, especially if you can benefit from the pre-attenuation pad and bass-cut filter. It is also very rugged and durable. However, if you think you don’t need the two special features, you can pick Rode NT1A instead.

MXL 770 Vs AT2020 Comparison

The prices of MXL 770 and Audio-Technica AT2020 on the market are quite similar to each other. As the two products are both condenser microphones, a lot of potential buyers often get confused in choosing between them. Neither MXL nor Audio-Technica should be underestimated, as these companies have manufactured various high-quality products that have received a lot of positive responses from the users. So, what are the differences between MXL 770 and Audio-Technica AT2020? Which is the mic that you should get?

MXL 770 Vs AT2020

Tonal Characteristics
As both MXL 770 and Audio-Technica AT2020 are condenser microphones, they share some similar characteristics. As you may have expected from condenser mics, they are both typically quite bright in audio reproduction. They can capture excellent details and accurate tones, with decent clarity and pleasant crispiness. Also, they both require the 48V phantom power in order to operate. They both are cardioid, which means that they pick up sounds the best from the front, while attenuating the sides and especially the rear. (See also: MXL V67G Vs MXL 770)

Technical Specs

MXL 770AT2020
- Frequency Range: 30Hz-20kHz- Frequency Range: 20-20,000 Hz
-Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Cardioid
- Sensitivity: 15mV/Pa- –37 dB (14.1 mV) re 1V at 1 Pa
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms- Output Impedance: 100 ohms
- Equivalent Noise: 20dB (A weighted IEC 268-4)- NOISE: 20 dB SPL
- S/N Ratio: 74dB (Ref. 1Pa A-weighted)- SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO 74 dB, 1 kHz at 1 Pa
- Power Requirements: 48V phantom power (+/- 4V)- PHANTOM POWER REQUIREMENTS 48V DC, 2 mA typical
- Size: 59mm x 158mm/2.32 in. x 6.22 in. - Weight: 1 lb/453.59g- DIMENSIONS: 6.38" (162.0 mm) long, - 2.05" (52.0 mm) maximum body diameter

However, like many other MXL mics, MXL 770 can be very bright. It is certainly brighter than Audio-Technica AT2020, to the point where it may sound a little bit too raw at times. This is good for weak vocals and instruments that struggle to keep their presence in the music. However, for louder sounds and more powerful voices, it may sound too harsh. Though, MXL 770 can indeed handle louder voices than Audio-Technica AT2020, as MXL 770 has a slightly higher maximum SPL handling of 144 dB, compared to Audio-Technica AT2020’s 137 dB max SPL handling.

On the other hand, Audio-Technica AT2020 can be quite more versatile than MXL 770. Audio-Technica AT2020 comes with a wider frequency response range than MXL 770. Audio-Technica AT2020 has a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, while MXL 770 comes with a frequency response range of 30 Hz – 20 kHz. As you can see, Audio-Technica AT2020 is especially able to reach lower frequencies. As the effect, it can deliver better bass performance, with fuller and more solid lows. The slightly smoother audio reproduction is suitable for a variety of vocal types.

Additional Features
Perhaps you would like to know that MXL 770 is a little bit heavier than Audio-Technica AT2020. MXL 770 is also slightly bulkier to the sides, though Audio-Technica AT2020 is the taller one.

Coincidentally, both mics have similar self-noise levels. They each has an equivalent noise level of 20dB-A, which is not too noisy and acceptable for professional purposes.

MXL 770 is also equipped with some additional features: a pre-attenuation pad and a high-pass filter. The pre-attenuation pad can be switched on to -10 dB to tame down excessively loud voices. Meanwhile, the high-pass filter is switchable to attenuate sounds under 150 Hz with an attenuation of 6dB/octave.

MXL 770 Vs AT2020

- Gold-sputtered, 6-micron, low distortion diaphragm
- FET preamp with balanced output
- Switchable bass cut and -10dB pad
- Legendary MXL sonic characteristics
- Comes with shock mount and rugged carrying case
- The price/performance standard in side-address studio condenser microphone technology
- Ideal for project/home-studio applications
- High SPL handling and wide dynamic range provide unmatched versatility
- Custom-engineered low-mass diaphragm provides extended frequency response and superior transient response
- Cardioid polar pattern reduces pickup of sounds from the sides and rear, improving isolation of desired sound source

Conclusion
While the two are very similar to each other and perhaps are both quite versatile, MXL 770 is more suitable for rap and female vocals, in which the brightness can create a good audio effect. On the other hand, Audio-Technica AT2020 is more suitable for different vocal types and instruments. For naturally lower voices, Audio-Technica AT2020 is the better choice here due to the lower edge of its frequency response range.

Rode NT1A Vs NT2A Comparison

Rode NT1A and Rode NT2A are both ‘Anniversary’ microphones released by Rode, some sort of special edition mics that are launched by the company to mark their anniversary. Both mics are quite popular on the market. The two boast each own’s high-class specifications and features. Both are ultra-quiet mics with very low self-noise levels. However, Rode NT2A is quite more expensive than Rode NT1A. Are you interested in investing in one of these mics, yet unable to choose which mic to invest on? Let’s compare these mics!

Rode NT1A Vs NT2A

Similar in Many Ways
Rode NT1A and Rode NT2A are indeed similar in many ways. They do share some resemblances in the designs. They both are silver in color, with a tiny tint of creamish light brown. They have identical shapes, except that Rode NT2A being slightly bulkier than Rode NT1A. Both mics are pressure-gradient condenser microphones with JFET impedance converters and bipolar output buffer. Each of them features a one-inch gold-plated diaphragm. They can work with both 24V and 48V phantom power, and have XLR output. Each includes the Rode SM6 shock mount, a pop filter, and a dust cover. (Please read also: Rode NTK Vs NT1A Comparison)

Needless to say, the similarities end there. Rode NT2A is more feature-packed than Rode NT1A. As the effect, though, Rode NT2A is also considerably heavier than Rode NT1A. Rode NT2A weighs 860 grams, whereas Rode NT1A only weighs 326 grams.

Technical Specs

Rode NT1ARode NT2A
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Range: 20 Hz ~ 20 kHz
- Output Impedance: 100Ω- Output Impedance: 200 ohms
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Directional Pattern: Three position variable – omnidirectional, cardioid or figure 8
- Maximum SPL: 137dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1KΩ load)- Maximum SPL: 147 dB (@ 1 kHz, 1% THD into 1k ohm load)(157 dB with pad at maximum)
- Maximum Output Level: 13.7mV- Maximum Output Voltage: > + 16 dBu (@ 1 kHz, 1% THD into 1k ohm load)
- Self noise of only 5dB (A)- Signal to Noise Ratio: > 87 dB SPL(A-weighted per IEC651)
- 11.5 ounces- Weight: 860 grams
- 15.2 x 4.5 x 11 inches- Dimensions (HxWxD): 209 x 55 x 55mm

Multiple Polar Pattern
Rode NT1A only has a single polar pattern, which is cardioid. It picks up sounds primarily from the front and sides, while attenuating the rear. On the contrary, Rode NT2A features multiple polar patterns. The model comes with a three-position variable polar pattern: cardioid, omnidirectional (picks up equally from all angles), and figure-eight (picks up from the front and the rear while attenuating the sides). The feature indeed provides a lot more versatility, allowing you to adjust the polar pattern according to the condition on the field.

High-Pass Filter and Pre-Attenuation Pad
Furthermore. Rode NT2A features an adjustable high-pass filter and pre-attenuation pad. The high-pass filter can be set to be flat, 40 Hz, or 80 Hz. The feature will attenuate the low frequencies that has been set, effectively boosting the presence of midrange and treble while reducing LF noises such as wind sounds, breath sounds, and mechanical vibrations. Meanwhile, the pre-attenuation pad can be set to be 0dB, -5dB, or -10dB.

Higher Maximum SPL Handling and Output Level
Last but not least, you may want to know that Rode NT2A has higher maximum SPL handling and output level than Rode NT1A. The NT1A has a maximum SPL handling of 137dB SPL at 1kHz with 1% THD into 1 kilo-ohms load, and a maximum output level of 13.7mV. On the other hand, the NT2A can handle up to 147dB and produce up to 16mV. Using Rode NT2A, you will be able to capture louder voices in good quality and produce louder output sounds.

Rode NT1A Vs NT2A

- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry
- Wide dynamic range
- Three position variable polar pattern: Omni, Cardioid & Figure 8; all controlled on the mic.
- Three position variable high-pass filter: Flat, 40 Hz or 80 Hz
- Three position variable pad: 0dB, -5dB or -10dB

Conclusion
All in all, Rode NT2A indeed makes a better choice, as the extra features allow more versatility to face different circumstances. The high-pass filter and pre-attenuation pad are especially very handy for recordings.

Shure Beta 58A Vs 87A Comparison

Finding difficulties in choosing between Shure Beta 58A and Shure Beta 87A? Both are super-cardioid microphones, and each one is loved by many people for the excellence of performance and output quality. However, they are being priced quite differently from each other. More often than not, you can find Shure Beta 87A to be quite more expensive than Shure Beta 58A. Yet, before you make a hasty decision, you should be aware that these mics are actually very different from each other, and that each of them can be the best choice under different circumstances.

Shure Beta 58A Vs 87A

Dynamic Mic versus Condenser Mic
Shure Beta 58A and Shure Beta 87A sound very differently from each other. This is because they indeed use different mechanisms and technologies. Shure Beta 58A is a dynamic microphone, while Shure Beta 87A is a condenser mic. The difference causes a lot of effects, but let us just get straight to the point here. Shure Beta 58A has a shorter frequency response range, 50 Hz – 16 kHz, while Shure Beta 87A’s frequency response range is 50 Hz – 20 kHz. As you can see, the 87A is able to reach higher frequencies, so it has better treble performance and more airiness in the audio reproduction. Also, much like other condenser microphones, the 87A sounds bright and crisp. The 58A is not as bright, and is kind of warmer instead.

Technical Specs

Shure Beta 58AShure Beta 87A
- Type Dynamic (moving coil)- Condenser (electret bias)
- 50 to 16,000 Hz- 50 to 20,000 Hz
- Supercardioid, rotationally symmetrical about microphone axis, uniform with frequency- Cardioid
- Open Circuit Voltage: -51.5 dBV/Pa* (2.6 mV) *1 Pa = 94 dB SPL- Phantom Supply Requirement: 11 to 52 Vdc, positive at both pins 2 and 3, Current Drain: 1.0 to 1.2 mA

Sensitivity
However, you need to be careful with the 87A because it is a very sensitive mic. It is extremely sensitive to sounds, and may be more prone to feedback. So, it is not very good for live performances unless you have a professional always ready to handle the board. On the other hand, the 58A is a lot more stable and resistant to noise and feedback, yet is not as sensitive. Hence, it is a convenience for live performances, but may not be as good as the 87A for capturing the sound details in a controlled recording session.

Phantom Power
Another thing to keep in mind is that Shure Beta 58A, as a dynamic mic, doesn’t require phantom power. Meanwhile, Shure Beta 87A, as a condenser mic, requires a phantom power between 11 to 52 V DC. Here, your other equipment plays some role in your consideration. Getting the 87A without being able to power it up is a plain mistake. Do you have what it takes to power the 87A? If you don’t, will you buy additional equipment to be able to provide the phantom power?

Additional Features
Each of them features a Neodymium magnet to provide a high signal-to-noise output level. Each also comes with a hardened steel mesh grille for maximum durability against wear and abuse, and an advanced pneumatic shock mount for reducing mechanical noise and vibration. Shure Beta 87A features a built-in pop filter for attenuating unwanted wind and breath sounds.

Shure Beta 58A Vs 87A

- Bundle with Gearlux Boom Stand, XLR Cable, and Austin Bazaar Polishing Cloth
- Handheld microphone for professional live vocals and project studio recording
- Shaped frequency response ideal for close-up vocals
- Dynamic cartridge with supercardioid polar pattern
- Advanced pneumatic shock mount system that minimizes transmission of mechanical noise and vibration
- Bundle with Gearlux Boom Stand, XLR Cable, and Austin Bazaar Polishing Cloth
- Premium quality supercardioid hand-held electret condenser vocal microphone
- Exceptionally smooth frequency response and high sound pressure level capability
- Used for professional sound reinforcement, broadcasting, and studio recording applications
- Controlled low-frequency roll-off that compensates for proximity effect and prevents the "boomy" sound often associated with close pick-up

Conclusion
One good advice from many users is that it is best if you get both Shure Beta 58A and 87A, because they do excel for different purposes and under different conditions. However, if you can only get one of them, Shure Beta 58A is perhaps more versatile, as the mic can be used reliably for recordings as well as live performances. On the other hand, Shure Beta 87A is the way if you only use the mic for recordings.

Razer Seiren Vs Razer Seiren Pro Comparison

Either you are a game-streamer or a professional Youtuber, you certainly have heard quite some about Razer if you are considering to get either Razer Seiren or Razer Seiren Pro. Known as a titan in the gaming peripherals industry, there was no surprise when Razer finally decided to make their own professional-grade studio microphones. However, as you may have guessed, Razer Seiren Pro is quite more expensive than the regular Razer Seiren. The two seem to be quite identical to each other – what are the differences between Razer Seiren and Razer Seiren Pro?

Razer Seiren Vs Razer Seiren Pro

The Similarities
To give you a good idea about these mics, let us see first the similar features of the two products. Both microphones are designed to serve HD recordings with outstanding clarity. Quite interestingly, the company doesn’t compromise too much on the cheaper model, as the two share quite a lot of similarly outstanding specs. They both record audio in a very good resolution of 24-bit/192kHz, which is more than sufficient to deliver clean and accurate recordings. They each is armed with three 14mm condenser capsules, and features a decent frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. As the effect, the two can capture the same lows, mids, and highs. They are reliable for handling reasonably loud voices with a maximum SPL handling of 120dB at THD 0.5%, 1kHz.

Technical Specs

Razer SeirenRazer Seiren Pro
- Connector USB- Connector USB
- Microphone Sensitivity 4.5mV/Pa (1kHz)- Sensitivity: 12.5 mV/Pa (1 kHz)
- Microphone Frequency Response 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency response: 20 Hz – 20 kHz
- 4 adjustable recording patterns (Cardioid, stereo, omnidirectional, bidirectional)- Polar patterns: Stereo, cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional.
- HD recording with outstanding clarity- HD recording with outstanding clarity

They both also feature on-board quick controls for polar pattern switching and controlling the mic gain level and headphone volume. Each of them is already armed with four adjustable recording patterns, consisting of cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo, for maximum versatility and performance under different circumstances. There is a built-in headphone amplifier with zero-latency output on each mic, which is very handy for direct monitoring. Both are Razer Synapse-enabled.

Better Sensitivity
However, some people may find Razer Seiren to be a little bit annoying at times for not picking some subtle details. This is due to the low sensitivity. With a sensitivity of 4.5mV/Pa, Razer Seiren may not pick ambient noise from the environment, yet may not be able to capture some slight details, especially from weak vocals and some instruments that aren’t quite loud. On the other hand, Razer Seiren Pro comes with a sensitivity of 12.5mV/Pa, which is certainly better.

High-Pass Filter
In addition, Razer Seiren Pro comes with a high-pass filter that can attenuate the frequencies below 100 Hz. This is a useful feature for reducing low-frequency noise such as wind and breath sounds. Razer Seiren lacks this feature.

XLR Recording
Last but not least, Razer Seiren Pro is a microphone that can be used with both USB and XLR. The bundle even includes a 5-pin XLR cable and a 3.5mm audio extension cable, in addition to the Mini USB-to-USB cable that is also available in the regular Razer Seiren’s bundle. Meanwhile, Razer Seiren only supports usage using USB.

Razer Seiren Vs Razer Seiren Pro

- Quick controls for pattern switching, headphone volume and mic gain
- Built-in headphone amplifier with zero latency output
- Plug and play recording via single USB connection
- Built-in headphone amplifier with zero latency output
- Play and play recording via single USB or XLR connection
- High-pass filter-filters frequencies below 100Hz

Conclusion
The extra features that Razer Seiren Pro offers are more valuable and will serve to the fullest value for music and demanding voice recordings, in which the XLR connection and high-pass filter are indeed very handy. On the other hand, if you use your mic only for streaming, Razer Seiren should be sufficient.