Neumann U67 Vs U87 Comparison

Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 come from the same family of condenser microphones. They may look quite similar, and they indeed share a number of similar features such as the switchable polar pattern, pre-attenuation pad, and high-pass filter. So, which one is better? Despite the similarities, there are a few distinctive features between Neumann U67 vs U87 that may make one of them more suitable for you than the other.

Neumann U67 Vs U87

The Similar Features
First of all, let’s see how these two condenser microphones are similar to each other. They each have three switchable polar patterns, which are cardioid, omnidirectional, and figure-eight. The cardioid polar pattern captures sound signals from the front while rejecting other signals from the sides and rear, so it is suitable for vocals. The omnidirectional polar pattern captures sound signals from all directions equally, and is great for some instruments and recording ambience.

Finally, the figure-eight polar pattern captures from the front and rear, and is handy for recording two voices at the same time, recording a singing instrumentalist, and recording in stereo. With these polar patterns, both Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 can be very versatile and useful in various recording situations. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs U87!

They each also have a 10dB pre-attenuation pad, which is handy for handling a loud singer or instrument, and a high-pass filter which can attenuate LF noise such as handling noise and wind. Again, these switchable features make these mics very versatile and handy for different recording needs and conditions.

Technical Specs

Neumann U67Neumann U87
- Microphone Type : Condenser- Microphone Type : Condenser
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8
- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHzResponse : 30Hz-18kHz
- Max SPL : 105dB (Cardioid), 110dB (Omni), 111dB (Figure-8)- Max SPL : 117dB (Cardioid) (127dB w/10dB Pre-attenuation)
- Output Impedance : 50 ohms- Output Impedance : 200 ohms
- Signal to Noise Ratio : 83dB (Cardioid), 78dB (Omni), 77dB (Figure-8)- Signal to Noise Ratio : 82dB (Cardioid); 79dB (Omni), 80dB (Figure-8)
- Self Noise : 11dB (Cardioid), 16dB (Omni), 17dB (Figure-8)- Self Noise : 12dB (Cardioid), 15dB (Omni), 14dB (Figure-8)

Frequency Response Range
The first difference between Neumann U67 vs U87 is the frequency response range. Neumann U67 has a shorter frequency response range of 40 Hz – 16 kHz. As the effect, it does not have much headroom, and it does not reach deep down for the bass. However, the sound quality is exceptional. It has a very natural sound. It works extremely well as a drum overhead, and is great for a simple drum set-up in a good room.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 comes with a longer frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz. It can capture higher and lower notes. However, the sound tends to be bright. It is great for vocals, as it can help to boost the presence of the voice. It is suitable for singers with deep voices and rappers.

Maximum SPL Handling
The next difference between Neumann U67 and Neumann U87 is the maximum SPL handling. Neumann U67 has a lower maximum SPL handling, which is 116 dB. On the other hand, Neumann U87 has a slightly higher maximum SPL handling, which is 117 dB. With the pre-attenuation pad turned on, it increases to 127 dB. So, Neumann U87 is slightly better in handling loud voices.

Neumann U67 Vs U87

- The Neumann TLM 67 is a large-diaphragm condenser microphone in the classic Neumann style
- 3 selectable directional patterns: omnidirectional, cardioid, and figure-810dB attenuation switch127dB SPL handling 20Hz to 20kHz response Impedance rated at 200 ohms.

Conclusion
In the end, choosing between these two mics depends on your need. If you prefer a natural-sounding mic that is suitable for both vocals and instruments, Neumann U67 is the way to go. It is relatively more versatile. On the other hand, Neumann U87 is great if you need a bright mic for singers with deep voices or rappers.

Rode Procaster Vs RE320 Comparison

In the following article, we have the comparisons between two popular broadcast microphones, which are Rode Procaster and Electro-Voice RE320. These two models are both glowing with positive reviews from their respective users. Both mics offer very good broadcast-quality sound suitable for podcasts, interviews, talk shows, and the likes. So, between Rode Procaster vs RE320, which one is the better mic? There are several differences that you can consider to choose the right mic.

Rode Procaster Vs RE320

Design and Dimensions
Rode Procaster is slightly bigger and quite heavier than RE320. It has a diameter of 53 mm and a length of 214 mm. The weight is about 745 grams. It comes in a rugged, durable metal housing with an XLR output connector. This mic is designed with broadcasting and podcasting purposes in mind, so it comes with an internal pop filter and shock mounting for the capsule to reduce plosives and low-frequency handling noise.

RE320 is slimmer and lighter. The diameter is about 49.2 mm, while the length is 216.7 mm. The weight is approximately 681 grams. Of course, it also comes in a durable metal housing with the three-pin XLR connector. This mic features an integrated humbucking coil and internal pop filters to deliver a virtually noiseless performance in any condition.

Technical Specs

Rode ProcasterRE320
- Acoustic Principle : Dynamic- Microphone Type : Dynamic
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency Range : 75Hz - 18kHz- Frequency Response : 30Hz-18kHz
- Output Impedance : 320Ω- Output Impedance : 150 ohms

Polar Pattern
The next difference of Rode Procaster vs RE320 is the polar pattern. Rode Procaster comes with a standard cardioid polar pattern, which is great for capturing sound signals from a single direction. The cardioid polar pattern focuses on capturing signals from the front while rejecting the ones from the sides and rear. In general, Rode Procaster does a good job in attenuating environmental noise.

RE320 is actually also a cardioid mic, which means that it also captures sound signals from the front while rejecting the ones coming from the sides and rear. However, RE320 comes with the Variable-D pattern control technology, which minimizes tonal shifts caused by positional factors. As a result, the sound can be more consistent as you address the mic from slightly different angles. This is great for users who often move when talking or singing.

Performance
Rode Procaster is pretty great for broadcasting and podcasting, but it is not really versatile for other purposes. The frequency response range only goes from 75 Hz to 18 kHz. It does not capture enough bass for vocals and musical instruments. The sound will be flat without much of a depth.

On the other hand, RE320 can be versatile when needed. It has a selection switch to choose from the two response curves. The generic curve goes from 45 Hz – 18 kHz, which is great for human voices. However, if you need more bass, you can activate the kickcurve mode which goes from 30 Hz – 18 kHz. The extended reach in the lower frequency area allows for better bass and depth.

Rode Procaster Vs RE320

- Broadcast quality sound, high output dynamic capsule
- Balanced, low impedance output, internal shock mounting of capsule for low handling noise
- Internal pop-filter to reduce plosives
- Variable-D pattern control minimizes positional and off-axis tonal shifts
- Integrated humbucking coil and integral pop filters provide virtually noiseless performance
- Unique dual-voicing switch selects from two response curves

Conclusion
All in all, between these two models, we recommend you to choose RE320. This is a more versatile mic with better sound quality. It has the Variable-D pattern control to reduce tonal shifts, and the wider frequency response range allows for deeper, better bass.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs U87 Comparison

Are you confused in choosing between Neumann TLM 102 vs U87? In the article below, we will discuss the comparisons between these great mics. Neumann TLM 102 serves as an entry-level model for people who want to have a look at Neumann’s range of high-quality mics. It is much more affordable, yet the sound quality is great. On the other hand, Neumann U87 is much more expensive and is equipped with more features. Continue reading below to determine the best model for you!

Neumann TLM 102 Vs U87

Dimensions
Neumann TLM 102 is quite significantly lighter at 210 grams. It is also more compact, with a diameter of 52 mm and a length of 116 mm. Hence, Neumann TLM 102 can be a more portable mic that is easy to handle. It is available in two finishes, matte black and nickel. The bundle includes a stand mount which is quite useful and effective for eliminating mechanical noise. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs 103.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 is quite bigger and heavier. It measures 56 mm wide, 200 mm long. The weight is approximately 500 grams. The finish is nickel. Depending on the set that you purchase, it may come with a wooden, cardboard, or aluminum box, along with optional suspensions.

Techincal Specs

Neumann TLM 102Neumann U87
- Directional pattern : Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid, Omni, Figure-8
- Frequency range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz- Frequency Response : 20Hz-20kHz
- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kΩ : 11 mV/Pa- Max SPL : 117dB (Cardioid) (127dB w/10dB Preattenuation)
- Rated impedance : 50 Ω- Output Impedance : 200 ohms

Features
Neumann TLM 102 is a decent cardioid microphone. The polar pattern is cardioid, which means that it focuses on the sound from the front while rejecting the signals from the sides and rear. Neumann TLM 102 also boasts a very high maximum SPL, 144 dB, which enables the mic to handle very loud voices. It has a slight presence boost above 6 kHz.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 comes with more advanced features. It has a switchable polar pattern with three characteristics: cardioid, omni-directional, and figure-8. Hence, Neumann U87 is a more versatile mic that can adapt to different needs and conditions. In addition, it has a switchable 10 dB pre-attenuation pad which can increase the maximum SPL from 117 dB to 127 dB. It also has a switchable low-frequency roll-off which you can use to attenuate LF noise.

Performance
Neumann TLM 102 vs U87 have some different characteristics. In general, the sound of Neumann TLM 102 is more neutral despite the slight presence boost above 6 kHz. It makes the sound slightly brighter without a significant change to the overall color. It can help vocals to cut through the mix. Compared to Neumann U87, the sensitivity is lower. It is not very good in capturing fine audio details. Nevertheless, the self-noise level is low at 12 dB-A, which means that this mic has decent clarity.

On the other hand, Neumann U87 is much more sensitive. It can capture fine audio details very well, but it is also more prone to noise. It also tends to be brighter. The self-noise level is similar to Neumann TLM 102 when in the cardioid mode, and it is generally a quiet mic with good clarity as well.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs U87

- Large-diaphragm microphone with cardioid directional characteristic (pressure gradient transducer)
- Very high maximum sound pressure level (144 dB)
- Slight presence boost above 6 kHz helps vocals to shine in the mix
- Arguably the best known and most widely used studio microphone in the world (for good reason), the easy-to-recognize U 87 is a classic!
- A distinctive design and mythical Neumann sound make this microphone a must-have for pro studios
- The U 87 is known for its one-of-a-kind frequency and transient response characteristics which deliver a smooth natural sound with a bunch of source material

Conclusion
If you don’t need multiple polar patterns and bass roll-off, Neumann TLM 102 is more recommended. It makes a good value, as it is much more affordable. The sound is more neutral, but the sensitivity is lower. In addition, the maximum SPL is higher. But if you need a versatile mic with multiple polar patterns, bass roll-off, and high sensitivity, Neumann U87 can be your choice.

Rode M5 Vs NT5 Comparison

Rode M5 and Rode NT5 are two pairs of condenser microphones often used for the stereo recording of live performances, choirs, as well as studio projects. Rode M5 is available at a significantly lower price point, and yet it is glowing with lots of positive reviews. It is praised for the excellent sound accuracy and detail. However, Rode NT5 does come with several advantages, such as the nickel-plated body, lower self-noise, lower impedance, and higher maximum SPL. Continue reading below for more details on Rode M5 vs NT5!

Rode M5 Vs NT5

Design
Rode M5 is a pair of stick condenser microphones designed for stereo recording. The mics are identical. Each has an all-metal housing with a ceramic matte-black coating. The housing is rugged and durable. Compared to the more expensive sibling, Rode M5 is shorter and lighter. Each mic measures 3.94 inches long and weighs approximately 3.00 oz.

Rode NT5 certainly looks more elegant and luxurious. This matched pair of condenser microphones features a satin-finish nickel-plates housing. The nickel plating enhances the durability. Nevertheless, the mics are longer and a little heavier. Each mic measures 4.65 inches long and weighs approximately 3.56 oz.

Technical Specs

Rode M5Rode NT5
- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient- Acoustic Principle : Pressure Gradient
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Output Impedance : 100Ω
- Power Options: +48V phantom power, +24V phantom power- Sensitivity : -38.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (12.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Features
Rode M5’s mics are cardioid. The heads are not replaceable, so you can only have the cardioid polar pattern. This is generally not a problem, but some projects may require omnidirectional heads for better results. For example, if you want to record the sound of a grand piano, cardioid heads may lose the bottom end, whereas omnidirectional heads can capture the sweet bass resonance.

Rode NT5’s mics also have cardioid heads. However, these heads are replaceable. You can purchase the omnidirectional heads for Rode NT55 and use them on Rode NT5. They work well. So, Rode NT5 can be more versatile, as you can use it with cardioid heads or omnidirectional heads for different projects and conditions.

Both Rode M5 and Rode NT5 come with their respective stand mounts and wind shields. Each product is protected by a 1-year warranty, but you can register your purchase to get a 10-year warranty.

Performance
So, how does the performance of Rode M5 vs Rode NT5 compare? Well, for the money, Rode M5 is already quite impressive. It is affordable, and yet it can deliver good sound quality. The sound is accurate and quite detailed. However, it is indeed on a lower level than Rode NT5. It has a higher self-noise level, and the noise may be annoying when you need to capture fine audio details.

Rode NT5 has noticeably better sound quality. It captures and reproduces fuller, more accurate bass. The mids and highs are more defined and detailed. Rode NT5 also has better clarity, thanks to the lower self-noise level. In addition, it has a higher maximum SPL, which means that it can reliably handle loud voices. Rode NT5 is great for recording soft ambient sounds as well as loud performances.

Rode M5 Vs NT5

- Acoustic Principle: Pressure Gradient
- Polar Pattern: Carded
- Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz
- Warranty: 1 year with free extension to 10 years following registration
- Externally biased condenser
- Gold sputtered 1/2 inch capsule
- Heavy duty satin nickel plated body
- Surface mount circuitry

Conclusion
If you are on a tight budget, Rode M5 makes a good solution. This model is more affordable, yet the performance is quite impressive. However, you should choose Rode NT5 if you can afford it. Rode NT5 has replaceable heads, and the sound quality is much better.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs 103 Comparison

Neumann’s models are generally accepted as high-quality microphones. In the following article, we will discuss the comparisons between Neumann TLM 102 vs 103, which are both among the more affordable models from the company. Neumann TLM 102 is available at a lower price point, and is praised for the natural audio character. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 is more expensive. It offers a lower self-noise level and top-end presence boost. See the details below to determine which mic is the best for you!

Neumann TLM 102 Vs 103

Design
Neumann TLM 102 is available in two finish options, which are matte black and nickel. It has the red Neumann logo embossed on the front side. It does look professional, and it feels rugged and durable. Compared to the sibling, Neumann TLM 102 is smaller and lighter. The diameter is 52 mm, and the weight is only 210 grams. (Read also : Rode NTK Vs Neumann TLM 102 Comparison)

On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 may look very similar at first – except for the size. This model is also available in two finish options, matte black and satin nickel, but it is bigger with a diameter of 60 mm. It is quite significantly heavier with a weight of 450 grams. The housing is also very rugged and durable.

Maximum SPL
When choosing between Neumann TLM 102 vs 103, note that they have different sound characteristics. Neumann TLM 102 has a more natural character which maintains the original qualities of the voice. In addition, it has a higher maximum sound pressure level (SPL) which is 144 dB. As the effect, this mic is great for loud and powerful singers. It is suitable for studio projects, broadcasters, and voiceover artists.

Neumann TLM 103 has a lower maximum SPL, which is 138 dB. So, it is not as good for taking care of loud, powerful singers.

Technical Specs

Rode VideoMic ProRode VideoMic Go
- Directional pattern : Cardioid- Directional pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz- Frequency range : 20 Hz - 20 kHz
- Sensitivity at 1 kHz into 1 kΩ : 11 mV/Pa- Sensitivity : 23 mV/Pa
- Rated impedance : 50 Ω- Rated impedance : 50 Ω

Sensitivity and Self-Noise
Neumann TLM 102 is a decent mic with good sensitivity and low self-noise. However, Neumann TLM 103 has even better sensitivity and lower self-noise. These qualities enable Neumann TLM 103 to capture more accurate audio details, and it can deliver better clarity.

Unlike Neumann TLM 102, Neumann TLM 103 has a presence boost on the top-end range between 6 – 15 kHz. As the effect, it tends to sound brighter. The presence boost can help the vocal to soar over the mix. It is especially very good for bass vocals and heavy male voices to increase the presence and audibility. It is also great for rap vocals.

However, Neumann TLM 103 is not recommended for bright voices, as the mic will make it sound too harsh. If you don’t want to get a bright-sounding mic, then this model is not for you.

Neumann TLM 102 Vs 103

- Compact Neumann design
- Very high maximum sound pressure level (144 dB)
- Slight presence boost above 6 kHz helps vocals to shine in the mix
- Large-diaphragm microphone with cardioid directional characteristic (pressure gradient transducer)
- Large diaphragm cardioid microphone
- Extremely low noise: 7 dB-A
- Straightforward handling for homerecording and professional studios
- Set includes microphone, shockmount and briefcase

Conclusion
Neumann TLM 102 and Neumann TLM 103 have different features and characters, and they are more suitable for different purposes. Neumann TLM 102 should be your choice if you prefer a more natural sound or if you need to avoid a bright-sounding mic. This model is great for loud, powerful singers due to the very high maximum SPL. On the other hand, Neumann TLM 103 is great for bass vocals, heavy male voices, and raps due to the presence boost. It has higher sensitivity and lower self-noise.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Go Comparison

So, you want to buy a shotgun mic in order to record videos with better audio quality. There are many people who would recommend Rode VideoMic models. After all, these are indeed very good entry-level shotgun mics suitable for DSLR cameras. However, there are several different models in the product line, designed for different needs and purposes. Two of the most popular options are Rode VideoMic Pro and Rode VideoMic Go. Yet, there is a considerable price gap between Rode VideoMic Pro vs Go. So, what is the difference between these shotgun mics of the same line?

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Go

Design
If you put the two mics side by side, you can see that Rode VideoMic Pro is indeed bigger. It actually measures 100 mm tall, 170 mm deep, and 75 mm wide. The weight is approximately 85 grams. Although it is bigger than the Go model, it is still considered compact, very lightweight, and portable. It is equipped with the Rycote Lyre shock mount, which is very effective for reducing handling noise. The cable is straight.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Go is the lightest mic in the line at just 73 grams. It is highly portable, as it measures barely 79 mm tall, 167 mm deep, and 73 wide. It is equipped with a somewhat similar shock mount which is quite effective for reducing handling noise. The audio cable is coiled. Don’t forget to check our previous post about Rode VideoMic Pro vs Takstar SGC 598 if you are looking for a budget-friendly mic.

Technical Specs

Rode VideoMic ProRode VideoMic Go
- Frequency Range : 40Hz - 20kHz (selected HPF @80)- Frequency Range : 100Hz - 16kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Maximum SPL : 120dBSPL
- Sensitivity : -32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- Sensitivity : -35.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (17.80mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Features
Rode VideoMic Pro comes with more additional features than the Go model. This mic is quite versatile and adjustable. It has a selectable high pass filter at 80 Hz which you can activate to reduce low-frequency noise. There is also a three-position level control which is adjustable to -10dB, 0, and +20dB. So, you can reduce or increase the sensitivity as needed. However, note that this mic requires a 9V battery to operate.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Go has neither the high pass filter nor the level control. The special feature is that it does not need any battery to operate. The power is supplied by the camera. It is convenient in a sense that you don’t need to worry about battery replacement.

Performance
In terms of performance, Rode VideoMic Pro is much better. It has a wider frequency response range of 40 Hz – 20 kHz, and the maximum SPL handling is also higher. Its self-noise level is very low at 14 dBA. This mic is able to capture sound with excellent accuracy and clarity. It is suitable for interviews, music, and film projects.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Go has a much narrower frequency response range of 100 Hz – 16 kHz. The self-noise level is considerably higher at 34 dBA. This model may have some noise issue, so it is only suitable for purposes like interviews and documentary reports.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Go

- Broadcast recording quality condenser microphone
- Compact design (only 150mm/6" length)
- Ultra lightweight (only 85g/3oz)
- 9V battery powered, with up to 70 hours battery life (alkaline)
- Rode USA Warranty - Rycote Mini Windjammer for Rode Videomic Go Microphone
- Adorama Valuable Bundle. Kit Includes
- Rode VideoMic GO Lightweight On-Camera Microphone
- Rycote Mini Windjammer for Rode Videomic Go Microphone, Rycote 1 Year Limited USA Warranty

Conclusion
Between these two models, Rode VideoMic Pro is indeed more recommended. It is more versatile, thanks to the selectable high pass filter and level control, and the sound quality is much better. But, if you really want to save some bucks, Rode VideoMic Go makes a viable alternative for interviews and documentary reports.

MXL 770 Vs Rode NT1A Comparison

Confused in choosing between MXL 770 vs Rode NT1A? Both of these two options are condenser mics that are quite popular on the market. These condenser mics are loved because of their natural sound and nice presence boost, both of which help to allow vocals to cut through the mix. So, which is the best condenser model that you better choose? Make sure that you read the comparisons below to make the right choice.

MXL 770 Vs Rode NT1A

Design
MXL 770 may have a better edge in terms of design due to the classy, professional look. The black metal grille pairs nicely with the black housing, and the golden font and golden line that circle the housing add a nice elegant touch. This model is slightly shorter and thicker. It is also a little bit heavier. The bundle includes a shock mount which is quite useful for reducing mechanical vibrations.

On the other hand, Rode NT1A has this long, slender shape that is colored in a silver hue with a slight creamish tint – see our previous post about Audio Technica AT2035 vs Rode NT1A. Well, the metallic construction looks professional, but it doesn’t look as classy as MXL 770. Nevertheless, the bundle includes more accessories, such as the shock mount and the wind filter. These accessories are very usable.

Technical Specs

MXL 770Rode NT1A
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid
- Frequency Range: 30Hz-20kHz- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz
- Sensitivity: 15mV/Pa- Sensitivity : -31.9dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms- Output Impedance : 100Ω

Features
MXL 770 is equipped with a selectable -10dB pre-attenuation pad and an optional high pass filter at 150 Hz. The pre-attenuation pad is very handy. You can use this feature when recording a particularly loud singer. On the other hand, the high pass filter won’t be used as frequently because it tends to eliminate the natural low-end sound of the mic. This mic requires +48V phantom power.

Rode NT1A does not have any pre-attenuation pad or high pass filter, but the included shock mount and wind filter are good enough for reducing mechanical vibrations and low-frequency wind/breath noise. This mic is compatible with both +24V and +48V phantom power.

Performance
So, how do the performance qualities of MXL 770 vs Rode NT1A mics compare? In general, Rode NT1A is indeed better, even though MXL 770 is not bad either.

MXL 770 tends to be very raw-sounding. It captures the vocal nicely. It has good accuracy and natural low-end, so it is especially great for raps. However, it cannot be equalized very much.

On the other hand, Rode NT1A boasts an ultra-low noise level of only 5dBA. It also has a wider frequency response range, and the neutral response means that it doesn’t add much color to the recording. As a result, it can deliver more accurate sounds with impressive cleanliness and clarity. The output can be equalized more extensively. Although it may be too bright for extremely high-pitched and bassy singers, you can adjust the EQ to make it sound better.

MXL 770 Vs Rode NT1A

- Multipurpose small-diaphragm microphone
- Warm sound with extra clarity at the top end
- FET preamp with balanced, transformerless output
- Excellent for vocals, acoustic guitars, pianos, strings and voice-work
- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Cardioid polar pattern
- Self Noise of only 5 dB (A)
- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry

Conclusion
Between these two models, Rode NT1A is the winner. It has better sound quality and versatility. It is more accurate and balanced. The ultra-low noise level is impressive. The neutral response allows you to adjust the EQ more freely.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Takstar SGC 598 Comparison

Rode VideoMic Pro vs Takstar SGC 598 are indeed very interesting options for a low-cost external mic that can help you record videos with better audio quality. Rode VideoMic Pro has been widely considered as the best entry-level shotgun mic for video projects. However, some people are still looking for a cheaper option, and Takstar SGC 598 seems to make a viable alternative. It has similar features, yet is priced at a much lower price point. See the comparisons between Rode VideoMic Pro and Takstar SGC 598 below to determine the best model for you!

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Takstar SGC 598

Design
Both models here are shotgun mics, so each of them has that typical long tubular shape. However, Rode VideoMic Pro is actually more compact – we recently discussed about Nikon ME 1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro, so don’t forget to take a look. The shock mount does not eat up so much space on the camera, yet is effective for reducing handling noise. The switches for adjusting the high pass filter and pre-attenuation pad are placed on the rear. So, you can see the settings without having to turn the camera around.

On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 is quite larger and heavier. The bulky shape may make it trickier to handle. The shock mount does reduce handling noise to a degree. The switches for the high pass filter and sensitivity enhancement are on the left side of the body. So, you will need to peek or turn the camera around to see the current settings. One nice thing is that the audio cable is coiled, which means that the cable won’t get into contact with the mic accidentally.

Technical Specs

Rode VideoMic ProTakstar SGC 598
- Frequency Range : 40Hz - 20kHz (selected HPF @80)- Frequency response : 50Hz-16kHz
- Output Impedance : 200Ω- Output impedance: 2000 À 30%
- Sensitivity : -32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz- Sensitivity : -32dB À 3dB (0dB = 1V/Pa at 1kHz)

Features
Both Rode VideoMic Pro vs Takstar SGC 598 mics have a cardioid polar pattern. They focus capturing the sounds from the direction they are being pointed to while rejecting other sounds from other directions. These mics are great if you want to isolate environmental noise.

Rode VideoMic Pro can be more flexible and versatile due to its features. It comes with a selectable pre-attenuation pad which has three settings: -10dB, 0, and +20dB. So, you can increase or decrease the sensitivity as needed. There is also an optional high pass filter which attenuates LF noise at 80 Hz and lower.

On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 has a switchable +10dB sensitivity enhancement and a low cut filter at 200 Hz. Unfortunately, the low cut filter is set way too high, and this may actually ruin the recording. Avoid using the low cut filter.

Sound Quality
In terms of sound quality, Rode VideoMic Pro is definitely much better. You should choose this model if sound accuracy, definition, and clarity are very important, for example when recording a musical performance. It has a wider frequency response range and better sensitivity, so the output quality is better. On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 is indeed only suitable for purposes that don’t need superior sound accuracy, for example when interviewing.

Rode VideoMic Pro Vs Takstar SGC 598

- Except for Iphone 7;Level Control: Three-position (-10 dB, 0, +20 dB);Output Impedance 200 ohms
- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) - 20dB-A.Ultra lightweight (85g/3oz). Please refer the Quick Start Guide before use
- 9 V battery operation.Sensitivity:-32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz
- 10dB sensitivity enhancement and 200Hz low-frequency attenuation; to meet the different field Co-use. Use standard universal connector specifications, can be simply fixed the camera
- Product Features: Specially designed for the camera and high-sensitivity condenser microphone to enhance the quality of the recording
- Set tone governing the selection of alloy materials design, sturdy solid, and can effectively shield electromagnetic interference

Conclusion
In the end, Rode VideoMic Pro is the best way to go. This mic is more versatile, and the output quality is much better. This mic is suitable for recording music as well as interviews. On the other hand, Takstar SGC 598 is only good for interviews, as it lacks sound accuracy.

Nikon ME 1 Vs Rode VideoMic Pro Comparison

If you want to get the best audio quality in your video projects, you need to equip your DSLR camera with a decent external mic. You can’t rely on the built-in mic in the camera because internal mics can’t really capture the sound from the source with good definition and clarity. Even an entry-level external mic can increase the audio quality significantly. Now, we will discuss about the comparisons between two entry-level external mics that are quite popular on the market, which are Nikon ME 1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro. Which one is better for you?

Nikon ME 1 Vs Rode VideoMic Pro

Dimensions
If you are looking for an external mic that you can easily bring along to places, compactness and portability are probably some of your top priorities. Between these two models, Nikon ME 1 is the one that is more compact and lightweight. It comes with an integrated shock mount and camera mount so that it can be mounted on the top of your camera right away. The audio cable ends in a 3.5 mm jack, and there is a cable stop that helps to keep the cable in place in order to prevent the cable from contacting the mic accidentally.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Pro is relatively bigger and heavier. It extends farther to the front. It also has an integrated camera mount, and the shock mount system is very effective for dampening handling noise. Of course, it is also equipped with a 3.5 mm audio cable. On the rear, you can find the switches for adjusting the pre-attenuation pad and high pass filter. See our previous post about Zoom H1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro, too!

Technical Specs

Nikon ME 1Rode VideoMic Pro
- Frequency response : 70 to 16,000 Hz- Frequency Range : 40Hz - 20kHz (selected HPF @80)
- Type : Back-electret condenser microphone- Output Impedance : 200Ω
- Sensitivity : -42 dB (0dB=1V/Pa, 1kHz)- Sensitivity : -32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Features
The next thing that you need to consider when choosing between Nikon ME 1 vs Rode VideoMic Pro is whether you will benefit more from a stereo mic or a shotgun mic. Nikon ME 1 is actually a stereo mic that is shaped like a shotgun mic. On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Pro is a true shotgun mic.

As a stereo mic, Nikon ME 1 records the sounds into two audio channels. This mic is more suitable if you want to capture the ambiance and three-dimensional effect. Meanwhile, Rode VideoMic Pro is a true shotgun mic that is very effective for capturing the sounds from a single direction and rejecting other sounds from other directions. It is great if you want to focus on a single source and to isolate the source from environmental noise, for example when recording speech.

Performance
In terms of performance, Nikon ME 1 is pretty good. It is a nice choice for beginners, as it is inexpensive. But the frequency response range only goes from 70 Hz – 16 kHz.

On the other hand, Rode VideoMic Pro offers better performance and output quality, as the frequency response range goes from 40 Hz – 20 kHz and the sensitivity is also better. The maximum SPL handling is also higher. It can capture clearer and more accurate details.

Nikon ME 1 Vs Rode VideoMic Pro

- The ME-1 Stereo Microphone connects to compatible DSLR cameras that have a 3.5mm Mic jack and features new innovation that significantly reduces autofocus noise from being recorded
- Designed for use with a digital SLR camera featuring a 3.5 mm (diameter) stereo mini-pin jack
- Equipped with a cable stop which holds the cable in place to prevent noise from being recorded with accidental contact with the cable
- Except for Iphone 7;Level Control: Three-position (-10 dB, 0, +20 dB);Output Impedance 200 ohms
- Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) - 20dB-A.Ultra lightweight (85g/3oz). Please refer the Quick Start Guide before use
- 9 V battery operation.Sensitivity:-32.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (20.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz

Conclusion
Unless you really, really prefer to use a stereo mic, Rode VideoMic Pro is more recommended. It has better overall output quality. The output is more accurate and detailed. It is very good for capturing sounds from one direction and rejecting environmental noise.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Beta 58 Comparison

Sennheiser and Shure continue their competition, this time with their dynamic handheld mics Sennheiser E935 and Shure Beta 58. Both are said to be suitable for live performances as well as studio uses. So, which one of them is actually better? Below, we will try to clear the confusion and see the actual differences between Sennheiser E935 vs Beta 58 to help you choose the best mic for the money. So, continue reading!

Sennheiser E935 Vs Beta 58

Design
Of the two, Sennheiser E935 looks better. It comes with an all-black color scheme, whereas the name of the product is written in white. It has a metal construction that is highly rugged and durable, and it is certainly ready to face travel and usage abuse. The metal grille is also black, and is rather compact. As a result, this mic looks elegant and professional. It happens to be a little bit heavier at 12.5 oz.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 comes with a more traditional look. The black housing is also rugged and durable. But it comes with a silver metal spherical grille. It looks plain and conventional. Nevertheless, the design works effectively. Don’t forget to check our previous post about the sibling, Sennheiser E935 vs Shure SM58.

Polar Pattern and Reception
Note that Sennheiser E935 vs Shure Beta 58 have different polar patterns. Sennheiser E935 is a cardioid mic, which means that it captures sounds only from the front while rejecting other sounds from other directions. It rejects environmental noise very well. On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 is a supercardioid mic. This mic also focuses on capturing sounds from the front. However, the rear rejection is not as strong. As the effect, this mic tends to be more susceptible to noise and feedback from the rear. But, to be fair, this mic still resists noise and feedback pretty well.

Technical Specs

Sennheiser E935Beta 58
- Pick-up pattern : Cardioid- Pick-up pattern : Supercardioid
- Frequency Response : 40 - 18000 Hz- Frequency Response : 50 to 16,000 Hz
- Sensitivity : 2,8mV/Pa = -51dB- Open Circuit Voltage: -51.5 dBV/Pa* (2.6 mV) *1 Pa = 94 dB SPL

Performance
Both Sennheiser E935 and Shure Beta 58 are generally great. They have very good sound quality. They are quite versatile for various applications and purposes. They both are also somewhat sensitive to plosives, so you may need a pop filter to reduce the plosives.

Many people prefer Sennheiser E935 because it gives more presence to the vocal. It produces very good midrange and treble. In general, it also sounds rounder and fuller. The output is smooth and warm, and the output is also crisp with good clarity. One more nice thing about Sennheiser E935 is that it doesn’t have too much low-end so that it won’t produce too much boom. Sennheiser E935 is suitable for both male and female vocals and various genres.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 has more low-end presence. The vocal presence is good, but not as great as Sennheiser E935. But you can choose this mic if you need to bump up the low-end presence. Shure Beta 58 is good for rock vocals.

Sennheiser E935 Vs Beta 58

- Made for the working musician
- Shock mounted capsule with humbucking coil
- Metal construction
- Cardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- Frequency response tailored for vocals, with brightened midrange and bass rolloff to control proximity effect
- Uniform supercardioid pattern for high gain before feedback and superior rejection of off-axis sound
- Neodymium magnet for high signal-to-noise output
- Hardened steel mesh grille that resists wear and abuse
- Bundle includes Shure Beta 58A Supercardioid Microphone, Boom Stand, 25-Foot XLR Cable, Windscreen, and Polishing Cloth

Conclusion
In general, Sennheiser E935 is the better choice. It has a more elegant design, and the performance is great and versatile. It produces better vocal presence that is crisp and clear. On the other hand, Shure Beta 58 tends to produce more low-end.