Rode NT1A Vs Shure SM7B Comparison

Microphone is indeed one of the tools is very important to be able to support your performance or time recording music. As the number type and also the brand of mic that is circulating in the market will certainly make you confused must choose which. Mic quality can indeed affect the quality of the sound produced. But not necessarily expensive priced at mic could produce a good sound. Therefore, choosing the right mic and with a sufficient budget. Could it be among the Rode NT1A vs Shure SM7B exists between list you guys? If there is, check out my review properly then disconnect your options soon.

Rode NT1A vs Shure SM7B

Rode NT1A
Rode NT1A vs Blue Bluebird is recommended by us to be read before you are following up this one. The Rode NT1-A Complete Vocal Recording Solution is such a large-diaphragm side-address condenser microphone intended for general instrument and vocal recording. The features are including 1″ diaphragm with a gold-plated membrane to provide a wide frequency response and exceptional signal-to-noise ratio. The cardioid polar pattern provides excellent off-axis rejection for minimizing noise caused by room ambiance, instruments, monitors, headphones, so on. The balanced, transformer-less output circuitry results in quiet, and also low-noise signal reproduction at high output levels. The NT1-A is powered via 48V phantom power and has a standard XLR connector too. The bundled accessory package includes a studio-grade shock mount comes with an integrated pop filter, a 20″ premium cable, and a dust cover. You will get a bonus DVD presented by Rode founder and president, Peter Freedman by purchasing this. The DVD covers a variety of tips and techniques to help you get the most out of your NT1-A.

Technical Specs

Rode NT1AShure SM7B
- Polar Pattern : Cardioid- Polar Pattern : Cardioid (unidirectional)
- Frequency Range : 20Hz - 20kHz- Frequency Response : 50 to 20,000 Hz
- Sensitivity : -31.9dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (25.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB - Type : Dynamic
- Output Impedance : 100Ω- Output Level : Open Circuit Voltage*: -59.0 dB (1.12 mV) *0 dB = 1 volt per Pascal

Shure SM7B
Shure SM7B dynamic cardioid microphone is known as the result of a warm sound and minimal proximity effects. The SM7B can ship with the original windscreen plus a larger version similar to the classic SM5B’s windscreen which also can add more dynamic range and +25db of clean gain by pairing your Shure SM7B with a Cloudlifter-1 Pre amp. The main features are classic cardioid polar pattern, uniform with frequency and symmetrical about axis. It provides maximum rejection and minimum coloration of off-axis sound, a wide-range frequency response for exceptionally clean and natural reproduction of both music and speech too. While the Bass roll off and mid-range emphasis controls come with graphic display of response setting. Improved rejection of electromagnetic hum, optimized for shielding against broadband interference emitted by computer monitors. Last but not least, Internal “air suspension” shock isolation virtually eliminates mechanical noise transmission.

Rode NT1A Vs Shure SM7B

- Large 1 inch capsule with gold plated diaphragm
- Cardioid polar pattern
- Self Noise of only 5 dB (A)
- Ultra low noise, transformerless surface mount circuitry
- Wide dynamic range
- Flat, wide-range frequency response
- Improved rejection of electromagnetic hum
- Now shipping with the A7WS detachable windscreen
- Classic cardioid polar pattern
- Includes foam winscreen, close-talk windscreen, and locking yoke mount

The reason why you should choose the SM7B, because of the poor quality of the NT1a, especially to the sound worth a crap for a singer with balls. The Rode gets harsh and grainy really quick with a singer that projects with their gut and not controlling their projection which is good. For example, in the style of Alice Cooper, the SM7 worked miracles comparatively. That being said, the SM7 needs a bunch of gain at the preamp, while an NT1a needs little gain, and seems to work best with more subtle sources.