In the following article, we have the comparisons between two popular broadcast microphones, which are Rode Procaster and Electro-Voice RE320. These two models are both glowing with positive reviews from their respective users. Both mics offer very good broadcast-quality sound suitable for podcasts, interviews, talk shows, and the likes. So, between Rode Procaster vs RE320, which one is the better mic? There are several differences that you can consider to choose the right mic.
Design and Dimensions
Rode Procaster is slightly bigger and quite heavier than RE320. It has a diameter of 53 mm and a length of 214 mm. The weight is about 745 grams. It comes in a rugged, durable metal housing with an XLR output connector. This mic is designed with broadcasting and podcasting purposes in mind, so it comes with an internal pop filter and shock mounting for the capsule to reduce plosives and low-frequency handling noise.
RE320 is slimmer and lighter. The diameter is about 49.2 mm, while the length is 216.7 mm. The weight is approximately 681 grams. Of course, it also comes in a durable metal housing with the three-pin XLR connector. This mic features an integrated humbucking coil and internal pop filters to deliver a virtually noiseless performance in any condition.
Technical Specs
| Rode Procaster | RE320 |
|---|---|
| - Acoustic Principle : Dynamic | - Microphone Type : Dynamic |
| - Polar Pattern : Cardioid | - Polar Pattern : Cardioid |
| - Frequency Range : 75Hz - 18kHz | - Frequency Response : 30Hz-18kHz |
| - Output Impedance : 320Ω | - Output Impedance : 150 ohms |
Polar Pattern
The next difference of Rode Procaster vs RE320 is the polar pattern. Rode Procaster comes with a standard cardioid polar pattern, which is great for capturing sound signals from a single direction. The cardioid polar pattern focuses on capturing signals from the front while rejecting the ones from the sides and rear. In general, Rode Procaster does a good job in attenuating environmental noise.
RE320 is actually also a cardioid mic, which means that it also captures sound signals from the front while rejecting the ones coming from the sides and rear. However, RE320 comes with the Variable-D pattern control technology, which minimizes tonal shifts caused by positional factors. As a result, the sound can be more consistent as you address the mic from slightly different angles. This is great for users who often move when talking or singing.
Performance
Rode Procaster is pretty great for broadcasting and podcasting, but it is not really versatile for other purposes. The frequency response range only goes from 75 Hz to 18 kHz. It does not capture enough bass for vocals and musical instruments. The sound will be flat without much of a depth.
On the other hand, RE320 can be versatile when needed. It has a selection switch to choose from the two response curves. The generic curve goes from 45 Hz – 18 kHz, which is great for human voices. However, if you need more bass, you can activate the kickcurve mode which goes from 30 Hz – 18 kHz. The extended reach in the lower frequency area allows for better bass and depth.
Rode Procaster Vs RE320
Conclusion
All in all, between these two models, we recommend you to choose RE320. This is a more versatile mic with better sound quality. It has the Variable-D pattern control to reduce tonal shifts, and the wider frequency response range allows for deeper, better bass.