Sennheiser E945 Vs Shure Beta 58A Comparison

If you are confused in choosing between Sennheiser E945 vs Shure Beta 58A, you have come to the right place. Below, we will see the comparisons between these two supercardioid vocal mics based on several factors. While they are both quite popular, one of them offers noticeably better clarity and overall sound quality.

By reading this article, you will understand better about:
– The similarities between Sennheiser E945 vs Shure Beta 58A,
– Their differences and performance comparison, and
– Which one is the best mic for the money.

Sennheiser E945 is a little heavier than Shure Beta 58A. It weighs about 12.875 oz. One reason behind the weight is the rugged metal construction. It is very tough and durable, and it can withstand usage abuse. In addition, it also has a shock-mounted capsule which reduces handling and mechanical noise. The grille is very durable, too.

Compared to the other mic here, Sennheiser E945 indeed looks more elegant and classy. The grille is not overly bulky, and the color has been toned down to suit the black body.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58A looks just like your typical microphone. It has a round, fat spherical grille. Nevertheless, this model is slightly lighter at just 9.9 oz, so it may be a little more convenient to handle. The mesh grille is made of hardened steel which is very durable. It also has a pneumatic shock mount system to minimize vibrations and mechanical noise. See also: Sennheiser E935 vs Beta 58.

Technical Specs

Sennheiser E945Shure Beta 58A
- Frequency response : 40 - 18000 Hz- Frequency Response : 50 to 16,000 Hz
- Nominal impedance : 350 Ω- Rated impedance : 150 ohms
- Sensitivity in free field, no load (1kHz) 2,0mV/Pa = -54dB (0 dB = 1V/Pa) = -74 dB (0 dB = 1V/ubar)- Polar Pattern : Supercardioid, rotationally symmetrical about microphone axis, uniform with frequency

Polar Pattern
Both Sennheiser E945 and Shure Beta 58A are supercardioid dynamic microphones. As dynamic microphones, they offer excellent performance on live stages. They also have excellent reliability and durability, as they are less affected by impacts compared to their condenser counterparts.

Being supercardioidmics, Sennheiser E945 and Shure Beta 58A offers great resistance against feedback and environment noise. According to StackExchange, supercardioid has more side rejection than cardioid polar patterns.These micshave very narrow pick-up angles, so they can focus only on the singer’s voice while rejecting other sounds from other directions. These are great mics for live situations.

Sound Quality
As mentioned above, Sennheiser E945 and Shure Beta 58A have noticeably different sound qualities. In general, Sennheiser E945 is better. It has a wider frequency response range of 40 Hz – 18 kHz. As the effect, it can capture sounds from lower and higher frequencies, hence delivering more accurate overall sound.

Sennheiser E945 has excellent clarity. It can capture the singer’s voice very clearly. It already sounds great without needing much tweaking.

On the other hand, Shure Beta 58A actually has good overall sound quality, but the clarity and accuracy just can’t match Sennheiser E945. Shure Beta 58A has a frequency response range of 50 Hz – 16 kHz. It usually requires the user to tweak the EQ in order to get the most accurate sound.

Sennheiser E945 Vs Shure Beta 58A

- Shock-mounted capsule: Low sensitivity to impact and handling noise
- Supercardioid pickup pattern: Insulation from other on-stage signals
- Neodymium ferrous magnet with boron: Keeps microphone stable regardless of climate
- Frequency response tailored for vocals, with brightened midrange and bass roll off to control proximity effect
- Uniform super cardioid pattern for high gain before feedback and superior rejection off axis sound
- Neodymium magnet for high signal to noise output

Between Sennheiser E945 vs Shure Beta 58A, we highly recommend you to choose Sennheiser E945. This mic has a better, more elegant design and better sound quality. The output has higher clarity and accuracy, and it does not need much tweaking to sound great.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *